Hi,
> The patch did improve things, but is still isn't perfect. If I configure
> my VISTA client to prompt me for my credentials the authentication works
> and I get connected. If I configure my VISTA client to use my windows
> login credentials (This is the default behavior) the Auth fails. For
>
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rg] On Behalf Of Michael Griego
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 9:30 PM
To: FreeRadius users mailing list
Subject: Re: Windows Vista doing PEAP
Cool deal. I have also been able to confirm that adding the
SSL_OP_DONT_INSERT_EMPTY_FRAGMENTS option to
Cool deal. I have also been able to confirm that adding the
SSL_OP_DONT_INSERT_EMPTY_FRAGMENTS option to the CTX makes Vista
work. This is good news for us since we have a volume license deal
and now have release copies beginning to be installed. :)
--Mike
On Nov 29, 2006, at 5:00 PM,
Michael Messner wrote:
> I think you have not seen the mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> subject:
> Re[4]: Windows Vista doing PEAP - WORKING!!!
Hmm... I have noticed the occasional email show up in the list
archives, but not in my inbox. Oh well.
I've added the patch to 1.1.4 & CVS head.
Hi,
> so my question is when there will be the next freeRADIUS release with
> included vista support?
right now with CVS and the one-liner patch ;-)
alan
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Alan DeKok schrieb:
> Michael Messner wrote:
>> Vista now working with freeRADIUS?
>
> No idea.
>
>> any debugging information needed?
>
> Yes, someone to test it would be nice. I don't have Vista, so I can't
> test it.
>
I think you have not seen the mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
sub
Michael Messner wrote:
> Vista now working with freeRADIUS?
No idea.
> any debugging information needed?
Yes, someone to test it would be nice. I don't have Vista, so I can't
test it.
Alan DeKok.
--
http://deployingradius.com - The web site of the book
http://deployingradius.c
hey,
Vista now working with freeRADIUS?
any debugging information needed?
ca mIke
Alan DeKok schrieb:
> Pedro Ribeiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The "Radiator" people are talking about problems with SSL empty
>> fragments handing in Windows Vista ...
>> I've tried to compile FreeRADIUS with
@
break;
}
+ DEBUG2("VISTA[%s:%d]: rcode %d", __func__, __LINE__, rcode);
+
return rcode;
}
> -Original Message-----
> From: freeradius-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:freeradius-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Phil Mayers
&g
Josh Howlett wrote:
Again, I have no idea why it's core dumping. It shouldn't be. I
don't have Vista, and I can't debug this issue myself. It's up to you.
Sorry - I've come late to this thread. Do we have a general problem with
Vista failing to authenticate against FR, or is this just one
Use this one if the one on the website doesn't work for you
Index: src/modules/rlm_eap/rlm_eap.c
===
RCS file: /source/radiusd/src/modules/rlm_eap/rlm_eap.c,v
retrieving revision 1.26.2.1.2.1
diff -u -r1.26.2.1.2.1 rlm_eap.c
--- src/m
Yeah, I'll do it today.
Brian
> -Original Message-
> From: freeradius-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:freeradius-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> King, Michael
> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 4:24 PM
> To: FreeRadius users mailing list
> Subject:
__LINE__ is an unsigned int... its being referenced in the patch as a
string (%s as opposed to %u).
--Mike
On Oct 19, 2006, at 10:30 AM, King, Michael wrote:
It seg faults when I do -X (or -sxx. But not with -x)
Here is the gdb log
rad2:/home/mking/freeradius-1.1.3/doc# more gdb-radiusd.
"King, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I did some reading, and __LINE__ returns an integer (%d). Would that
> cause a segfault, I figured it would just cause a compile error.
>
> I changed __FUNCTION__ to __func__ and the second %s to %d, and the last
> line in the patch, I removed the two
-Original Message-
>>Again, I have no idea why it's core dumping. It shouldn't be.
>>I don't have Vista, and I can't debug this issue myself. It's up to
you.
Should this line be like this?
DEBUG2("VISTA[%s:%s]: here", __FUNCTION__, __LINE__);
I have not coded in C (or C++) for 5 y
G printing)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Dourty, Brian R. (IATS)
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 4:44 PM
To: FreeRadius users mailing list
Subject: RE: Windows Vista doing PEAP
We have also posted here about our difficulties with Win
rsday, October 19, 2006 2:52 PM
> To: FreeRadius users mailing list
> Subject: RE: Windows Vista doing PEAP
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> Sorry - I've come late to this thread. Do we have a general problem
> with
> Vista failing to authenticate against FR,
Josh Howlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry - I've come late to this thread. Do we have a general problem with
> Vista failing to authenticate against FR, or is this just one instance
> failing, and we know of other instances where it is working?
It's not working at all. The failure mode
-Original Message-
Sorry - I've come late to this thread. Do we have a general problem with
Vista failing to authenticate against FR, or is this just one instance
failing, and we know of other instances where it is working?
It's most likely I'm the first to try it, and I've had.
Alan DeKok wrote:
"King, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It seg faults when I do -X (or -sxx. But not with -x)
At this point, I have no clue why it's dying.
I suggest editing the code yourself. The issue is that a decision
is being made by the module to not continue processing the E
"King, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seg faults when I do -X (or -sxx. But not with -x)
At this point, I have no clue why it's dying.
I suggest editing the code yourself. The issue is that a decision
is being made by the module to not continue processing the EAP
session, but I do
It seg faults when I do -X (or -sxx. But not with -x)
Here is the gdb log
rad2:/home/mking/freeradius-1.1.3/doc# more gdb-radiusd.log
Starting program: /usr/sbin/freeradius -X
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 1077729984 (LWP 2603)]
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segm
I thought it looked a bit funny
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Alan DeKok
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 7:39 PM
To: FreeRadius users mailing list
Subject: Re: Windows Vista doing PEAP
"King, Michael" <[EMAIL PROT
"King, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> rad2:/home/mking# /usr/sbin/freeradius -x
Please -X, not -x.
The debug log you posted DOES NOT include the new messages, and
therefore is of no help in solving the problem.
Alan DeKok.
--
http://deployingradius.com - The web site
Here we are: I did it twice.
Funny it sent an access reject the second time.
rad2:/home/mking# /usr/sbin/freeradius -x
Starting - reading configuration files ...
Using deprecated naslist file. Support for this will go away soon.
Module: Loaded exec
rlm_exec: Wait=yes but no output defined. Did
"King, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I got the same results as below with RC2.
Arg. Dumb mistake. Try it now:
http://striker.ottawa.on.ca/~aland/vista.patch
Alan DeKok.
--
http://deployingradius.com - The web site of the book
http://deployingradius.com/blog/ - The blog
-
I got the same results as below with RC2.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of King, Michael
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 1:56 PM
To: FreeRadius users mailing list
Subject: RE: Windows Vista doing PEAP
Alan, here is your requested
-Original Message-
Are you sure you're using the new code? It looks to me like it's NOT
installing the server with symbols, and it's NOT printing the new
debugging messages.
I was, I just wasn't building the server right. I figured it out a few
hours later (See my later emails)
"King, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anways, here's what I got following those direcitons (Which is what
> leads me to think the symbols go stripped)
>
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
Are you sure you're using the new code? It looks to me like it's
NOT installin
Alan, here is your requested capture.
This was with RC1
I will be reattempting with RC2 in a little bit.
rad2:~# gdb /usr/sbin/freeradius
GNU gdb 6.4.90-debian
Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome
ailing list
Subject: Re: Windows Vista doing PEAP
Hi
On 10/10/06, King, Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm assuming it built it that way.
>
> Anways, here's what I got following those direcitons (Which is what
> leads me to think the symbols go stripped)
If you
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of K. Hoercher
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 2:06 AM
To: FreeRadius users mailing list
Subject: Re: Windows Vista doing PEAP
Hi
On 10/10/06, King, Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm assuming it built it that way.
>
> Anways, here'
Hi
On 10/10/06, King, Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm assuming it built it that way.
Anways, here's what I got following those direcitons (Which is what
leads me to think the symbols go stripped)
If you look at or around line 188, there should be dh_strip, which
normally does live up
adius/libradius-1.1.3.so
No symbol table info available.
#13 0x in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Alan DeKok
Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 4:37 PM
To: FreeRadius users mailing list
Subject: Re
"King, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not to rude, have you had a chance to poke that Patch again?
Reload it from the same URL as last time.
If it still crashes, see doc/bugs. I don't see how it can crash at
all, so the crash looks like a symptom of another issue.
Alan DeKok.
--
Not to rude, have you had a chance to poke that Patch again?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Alan DeKok
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 6:54 PM
To: FreeRadius users mailing list
Subject: Re: Windows Vista doing PEAP
"King, Mi
Hi,
> I created the vista.patch file by pasting the file you referenced into a
> vi session.
> I moved it into freeradius-1.1.3
> I used the command:
> patch -p0 Which gave me a success. (Well two of them for each file)
>
> I recreated my .deb file and installed it.
>
> Let me know if I did thi
"King, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Things didn't work so hot. :-( Seg Fault
Arg. I'll go back and poke the patch again.
Alan DeKok.
--
http://deployingradius.com - The web site of the book
http://deployingradius.com/blog/ - The blog
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? S
Just to double check that I didn't cut paste wrong,
I wget'd the file from your server, repatched, recompiled, and
reinstalled.
Same seg fault, at same place.
rlm_eap_tls: Start returned 1
VISTA[eap_compose:475]: reply->id 6
VISTA[eap_compose:476]: reply->code 1
VISTA[eap_compose:514]: eap->re
Things didn't work so hot. :-( Seg Fault
I created the vista.patch file by pasting the file you referenced into a
vi session.
I moved it into freeradius-1.1.3
I used the command:
patch -p0 id 6
VISTA[eap_compose:476]: reply->code 1
VISTA[eap_compose:514]: eap->request->code 1
VISTA[eap_compose:5
Hi,
>
> How do I "re-build & re-install the EAP module"? I originally installed
> from a self-made debian package.
apply the patch to the source code that you built your self-made debian
package from and then redo the package build. it'll build freeradius
with the new code in the EAP module.
-Original Message-
Try: http://www.striker.ottawa.on.ca/~aland/vista.patch
You'll have to re-build & re-install the EAP module (you don't need to
touch the rest of the server). It won't help, but it will print out a
little more information. We'll probably have to do a few cycles b
"King, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So we've been using FreeRADIUS talking to ActiveDirectory to
> authenticate our WinXP clients (Over 2000) for over a year now.
> Along comes Vista. Of COURSE it doesn't work. Microsoft changed
> something, and it broke a working config. Arrg.
Try:
43 matches
Mail list logo
