Hi,
* FreeRADIUS has no notion of a stable release. Many projects maintain
'stable' or 'stale'
if you go for the 'stable' release of most daemons you will not
have the ability to do certain things, the latest version will have those
abilities.
in the FR case, the most 'tested' version is
Hi,
This is a production server,
What is the latest stable version to use?
'stable' is all in the mind ;-)
we run the latest 2.1.11 from GIT on our production servers (nee 2.1.12)
and a 3.x release on a couple of test servers to test/see the new functions.
alan
-
List
John Dennis jden...@redhat.com writes:
* FreeRADIUS has way too much churn for a critical system
service. Think about other system services, how often do you see
kerberos, bind, iptables, pam, MySQL, etc. going through significant
revisions? Are the administrators of those services constantly
fault freeradius 2.1.7 using rlm_sql
Amir Tal wrote:
For some unknown reason radiusd keeps getting segmentation faults, every few
days and even after several hours of work.
Upgrade.
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
-
List info
On 2 Aug 2011, at 09:27, Amir Tal wrote:
Upgraded freeradius to 2.1.11 (built from source)
Don't use 2.1.11 it segfaults, checkout the head of the 2.1.X branch in git
-Arran
Arran Cudbard-Bell
a.cudba...@freeradius.org
RADIUS - Half the complexity of Diameter
-
List
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Amir Tal a...@ccc.co.il wrote:
Upgraded freeradius to 2.1.11 (built from source)
This time it brought the whole machine down:
Notice how I DIDN'T suggest upgrading to 2.1.11, but to v2.1.x of git
branch? There's a reason for that, and you just found out the hard
02, 2011 11:02 AM
To: FreeRadius users mailing list
Subject: Re: segmentation fault freeradius 2.1.7 using rlm_sql
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Amir Tal a...@ccc.co.il wrote:
Upgraded freeradius to 2.1.11 (built from source)
This time it brought the whole machine down:
Notice how I DIDN'T
Message-
From: freeradius-users-bounces+amir=ccc.co...@lists.freeradius.org
[mailto:freeradius-users-bounces+amir=ccc.co...@lists.freeradius.org] On
Behalf Of Fajar A. Nugraha
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 11:02 AM
To: FreeRadius users mailing list
Subject: Re: segmentation fault freeradius
Upgraded freeradius to 2.1.11 (built from source)
Don't use 2.1.11 it segfaults, checkout the head of the 2.1.X branch in git
Notice how I DIDN'T suggest upgrading to 2.1.11, but to v2.1.x of git
branch? There's a reason for that, and you just found out the hard
way.
Houston, we have a
John Dennis wrote:
FreeRADIUS has some problems which other projects have avoided.
Sure. The reasons are pretty straightforward. The contribution from
the community is small. The people who contribute get few rewards, and
lots of arrows. The people who complain don't contribute.
It's
, 2011 4:33 PM
To: FreeRadius users mailing list
Subject: Re: segmentation fault freeradius 2.1.7 using rlm_sql
Amir Tal wrote:
For some unknown reason radiusd keeps getting segmentation faults, every few
days and even after several hours of work.
Upgrade.
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe
-
From: freeradius-users-bounces+amir=ccc.co...@lists.freeradius.org
[mailto:freeradius-users-bounces+amir=ccc.co...@lists.freeradius.org] On
Behalf Of Alan DeKok
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 4:33 PM
To: FreeRadius users mailing list
Subject: Re: segmentation fault freeradius 2.1.7 using
Hi all,
freeRADIUS version 2.1.7
(package freeradius2 on centos 5.6)
Radius is configured to store user info (auth) in ldap - running on same
machine as freeradius,
and use rlm_sql for accounting info (and simultaneous use checks) - running on
remote machine.
For some unknown reason radiusd
Amir Tal wrote:
For some unknown reason radiusd keeps getting segmentation faults, every few
days and even after several hours of work.
Upgrade.
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
14 matches
Mail list logo
