Daniel Pocock wrote:
> The FTP masters just accepted the new freeradius-client package, it
> should be available to install now using "apt-get"
>
> I've opened a bug request for removal of the radiusclient-ng package
> from the Debian archive
Thanks.
Ala
The FTP masters just accepted the new freeradius-client package, it
should be available to install now using "apt-get"
I've opened a bug request for removal of the radiusclient-ng package
from the Debian archive
On 19/07/13 19:25, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
> On 15/07/13
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:30:54AM +0100, Phil Mayers wrote:
> Matthew Newton wrote:
> >On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 09:52:14PM +0200, Martin Kraus wrote:
> >> well looking at man wpa_supplicant I can see
> >>
> >> EAP-PEAP/TLS
> >
> >I think that should be PEAP/EAP-TLS. Otherwise I'm not sure what
>
Phil Mayers wrote:
> PEAP/MSCHAP is *always* PEAP/EAP-MSCHAPv2 IIRC. Unlike TTLS there's no
> "bare" MSCHAP variant, because there's no spec for how to derive the
> MSCHAP challenge from the TLS master secret.
FWIW: PEAP is TLS + inner EAP. That's why there's no PAP / CHAP /
MS-CHAP inside the
On 22/08/13 10:54, Alan Buxey wrote:
TLS in PEAP. Yes I've seen it. And EAP-MSCHAPV2 in PEAP
PEAP/MSCHAP is *always* PEAP/EAP-MSCHAPv2 IIRC. Unlike TTLS there's no
"bare" MSCHAP variant, because there's no spec for how to derive the
MSCHAP challenge from the TLS master secret.
The EAP meth
TLS in PEAP. Yes I've seen it. And EAP-MSCHAPV2 in PEAP
alan
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Matthew Newton wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 09:52:14PM +0200, Martin Kraus wrote:
>> well looking at man wpa_supplicant I can see
>>
>> EAP-PEAP/TLS
>
>I think that should be PEAP/EAP-TLS. Otherwise I'm not sure what
>it's talking about.
>
Huh, and I thought MS-PEAP specified only soh and msch
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 01:28:08PM +0100, Matthew Newton wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 01:17:02PM +0200, Martin Kraus wrote:
> > I managed to get EAP-TTLS/TLS working but EAP-PEAP/TLS fails after the outer
> > TLS tunnel is established:
>
> On the assumption that your certificates are OK...
>
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:45:11PM +0100, Matthew Newton wrote:
> If that's all you're doing, forget about PEAP and just go for
> straight EAP-TLS. All PEAP really gives you on top is the SoH
> support, and may cause problems with other non-Windows clients.
> EAP-TLS should work on more devices.
I
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 09:52:14PM +0200, Martin Kraus wrote:
> well looking at man wpa_supplicant I can see
>
> EAP-PEAP/TLS
I think that should be PEAP/EAP-TLS. Otherwise I'm not sure what
it's talking about.
> also from my google searches it might be possible that windows supports
> PEAP/TLS
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 01:13:57PM +0100, Phil Mayers wrote:
> On 21/08/2013 12:17, Martin Kraus wrote:
> >Hi.
> >I managed to get EAP-TTLS/TLS working but EAP-PEAP/TLS fails after the outer
>
> Is this really what you mean? TTLS outer and TLS inner, versus PEAP
> outer and TLS inner?
>
> Because
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 01:17:02PM +0200, Martin Kraus wrote:
> I managed to get EAP-TTLS/TLS working but EAP-PEAP/TLS fails after the outer
> TLS tunnel is established:
On the assumption that your certificates are OK...
Have you updated the fragment_size so that the outer is larger
than the inne
On 21/08/2013 12:17, Martin Kraus wrote:
Hi.
I managed to get EAP-TTLS/TLS working but EAP-PEAP/TLS fails after the outer
Is this really what you mean? TTLS outer and TLS inner, versus PEAP
outer and TLS inner?
Because the latter is unlikely to work; it's not a supported combo per
the PEAP
Hi.
I managed to get EAP-TTLS/TLS working but EAP-PEAP/TLS fails after the outer
TLS tunnel is established:
WARNING: !!
WARNING: !! EAP session for state 0x992158e5992955e0 did not finish!
WARNING: !! Please read http://wiki.freer
On 15/07/13 23:21, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>
> On 15/07/13 21:51, Alan DeKok wrote:
>> Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>> I just opened this report against radiusclient-ng in Debian (see below),
>>> can anybody else comment on the situation, in particular, for
>>>
On 15/07/13 21:51, Alan DeKok wrote:
> Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> I just opened this report against radiusclient-ng in Debian (see below),
>> can anybody else comment on the situation, in particular, for
>> compatibility? Is there any urgency for Debian to update to t
he thought i could do nothing with them.
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
> I just opened this report against radiusclient-ng in Debian (see below),
> can anybody else comment on the situation, in particular, for
> compatibility? Is there any urgency for Debian
Daniel Pocock wrote:
> I just opened this report against radiusclient-ng in Debian (see below),
> can anybody else comment on the situation, in particular, for
> compatibility? Is there any urgency for Debian to update to the new
> client code?
It has a number of bugs fix
I just opened this report against radiusclient-ng in Debian (see below),
can anybody else comment on the situation, in particular, for
compatibility? Is there any urgency for Debian to update to the new
client code?
I think the wiki page referenced below is not up to date, it refers to a
CVS
On 27.02.2013 02:59, Jennifer Mehl wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just updated to Debian wheezy 7.0, kernel 3.2.0-4-amd64, and the
> accompanying freeradius-2.1.12+dfsg-1.2. (Previously using Debian squeeze
> 6.0 and freeradius 2.1.10+dfsg-2+squeeze1.)
There's a know bug in 2.1.
On 05/12/2012 4:57 μ.μ., Zenon Mousmoulas wrote:
A fellow DD noted private libraries, as in /usr/lib/freeradius, are not
s/fellow DD/friend, who happens to be a DD/
Minor correction! I am not a Debian developer.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
me or slightly newer versions of the same tools (build-deps) are
used in Debian Wheezy.
(a) Boilermake is unusable on Debian, so once the old build system is
phased out, package builds will be impossible.
Or, you can help us fix the problem.
I certainly want to, but I need someone
Zenon Mousmoulas wrote:
> My understanding of the above is that
> (a) Boilermake seems to work on Ubuntu, no idea why.
Because it's working as designed.
> (a) Boilermake is unusable on Debian, so once the old build system is
> phased out, package builds will be impossible.
On 28/11/2012 5:36 μ.μ., Zenon Mousmoulas wrote:
[...]
I am trying to figure out what tool or build-dep may be causing this.
So after a lot of trial and error, this is the summary:
* Package gets built on Ubuntu 12.04, without touching debian/rules.
* Package gets built on Debian Squeeze
On 28/11/2012 1:07 π.μ., Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
>I just did build on fresh ubuntu 12.10 VM and it looks fine to me
>
>root@shinyhead-ldap:~/build/freeradius-server# ldd
debian/tmp/usr/sbin/freeradius
>linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x7fffae945000)
>libfreeradius-rad
r 996ac3c [origin/master] More dependencies
>>> remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/master
>>> remotes/origin/master 996ac3c More dependencies
>>
>> Well, that should be OK.
>>
>> Is this from a fresh checkout? I just don't see
-> origin/master
>> remotes/origin/master 996ac3c More dependencies
>
> Well, that should be OK.
>
> Is this from a fresh checkout? I just don't see that on my debian
> machine.
>
>> # ldd debian/tmp/usr/sbin/freeradius
>
> Please do
dependencies
Well, that should be OK.
Is this from a fresh checkout? I just don't see that on my debian
machine.
> # ldd debian/tmp/usr/sbin/freeradius
Please don't post dozens of lines of crap. It's good enough just to
post one or two lines, to get the idea.
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 11:30:26 -0500, Alan DeKok
wrote:
> Zenon Mousmoulas wrote:
>> I am also trying to build Debian packages from git master.
>
> Are you sure you're using the latest code from the "master" branch? I
> added fixes a few days ago which fixed
Zenon Mousmoulas wrote:
> I am also trying to build Debian packages from git master.
Are you sure you're using the latest code from the "master" branch? I
added fixes a few days ago which fixed those for me.
$ ldd debian/tmp/usr/sbin/radiusd
linux-vdso.so.1 =>
Hi,
I am also trying to build Debian packages from git master.
On Fri Nov 23 20:52:32 CET 2012, Olivier Beytrison wrote:
I also noticed the following messages during package creation :
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: couldn't find library libfreeradius-eap.so
needed by debian/freeradius/us
section.
/etc/freeradius/sites-enabled/default[263]: Errors parsing authenticate
section.
Ok. I think that's fixed, could you pull and test?
Yay Freeradius installs correctly and starts if you apply the following
patch:
diff --git a/debian/freeradius.install b/debian/freeradi
On 23 Nov 2012, at 15:53, Olivier Beytrison wrote:
> On 21.11.2012 14:52, Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
>>
>> On 21 Nov 2012, at 13:41, Olivier Beytrison wrote:
>>
Oh dear. That'd be why that's happening...
>>>
>>> I have the same output. But I can't see what you saw. Is there a
>>> "libfr
gt; Subject: Re: Debian build the freeradius package with unixodbc support
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 3:33 AM, Dominick Rivard
wrote:
> I also want to let you know that it has been replaced by
> libiodbc2-dev but
> No, it hasn't.
> http://packages.debian.org/wheezy/unixodbc-dev
>
On 21.11.2012 14:52, Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
>
> On 21 Nov 2012, at 13:41, Olivier Beytrison wrote:
>
>>> Oh dear. That'd be why that's happening...
>>
>> I have the same output. But I can't see what you saw. Is there a
>> "libfreeradius-eap.so" missing somewhere ?
>
> Yep. Can't resolve the
rking and being tested for a
> future production move.
I'm just wondering, why didn't you just use iodbc? That seems to be
the default in debian, and should work for mssql.
--
Fajar
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
From: freeradius-users-bounces+drivard=datavalet@lists.freeradius.org
[mailto:freeradius-users-bounces+drivard=datavalet@lists.freeradius.org]
On Behalf Of Fajar A. Nugraha
Sent: November-13-12 9:58 PM
To: FreeRadius users mailing list
Subject: Re: Debian build the freeradius package with uni
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 09:32:57AM +0100, Olivier Beytrison wrote:
> Same thing on a clean system, with debian package or normal compilation.
> Is there a way to actually see the commands used during the building
> process, as it is with "standard" building system ?
Edit scr
I've made a fresh clone right now from git. Tested again. Building is
> ok. Freeradius still complains about rlm_eap [1]. Just to be sure I'll
> try to install the deb package on a clean system. Will report later
> about it.
Same thing on a clean system, with debian package or
On 21.11.2012 17:13, Alan DeKok wrote:
> Olivier Beytrison wrote:
>> Aside this, I've been able to compile and make the packages, it
>> correctly loads the configuration, but I back at a previous problem :
>> /usr/local/freeradius/etc/raddb/mods-enabled/eap[17]: Failed to link to
>> module 'rlm_eap
Matthew Newton wrote:
> Build & install all now seems to work great.
> (As usual after a tedious configure) 5.4 second build here. I'm
> still amazed at that :)
Using modern build tools helps a lot.
> The debian package builds now builds, too (much slower, it'
s worth
> it. Faster, simpler to understand, incremental builds, full
> dependencies, etc.
(As usual after a tedious configure) 5.4 second build here. I'm
still amazed at that :)
The debian package builds now builds, too (much slower, it's
serial make), but it's getting a libr
Thanks Matt, Phil,
I'Ve been able to load the default config files. Now I just need to
configure the capabilities I need. :)
--
Cheers
Dg
On 21/11/2012 15:57, "Matt Zagrabelny" wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 9:18 AM, David Gethings
>wrote:
>> Hi All,
>&
Olivier Beytrison wrote:
> Aside this, I've been able to compile and make the packages, it
> correctly loads the configuration, but I back at a previous problem :
> /usr/local/freeradius/etc/raddb/mods-enabled/eap[17]: Failed to link to
> module 'rlm_eap': /usr/local/freeradius/lib/rlm_eap.so: unde
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 9:18 AM, David Gethings wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> It appears that the Debian package for freeradius 2.1.10 does not install
> the configuration files. At least that is what is happening on my system. As
> I try to resolve this is it possible to get a copy of t
he default config
files from some other location so I can get the radius server going again.
--
Cheers
Dg
On 21/11/2012 15:29, "Arran Cudbard-Bell"
wrote:
>
>On 21 Nov 2012, at 15:18, David Gethings wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> It appears that th
On 21/11/12 15:18, David Gethings wrote:
Hi All,
It appears that the Debian package for freeradius 2.1.10 does not
install the configuration files. At least that is what is happening on
my system. As I try to resolve this is it possible to get a copy of the
config files from some other location
On 21 Nov 2012, at 15:18, David Gethings wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> It appears that the Debian package for freeradius 2.1.10 does not install the
> configuration files. At least that is what is happening on my system. As I
> try to resolve this is it possible to get a copy of the co
Hi All,
It appears that the Debian package for freeradius 2.1.10 does not install the
configuration files. At least that is what is happening on my system. As I try
to resolve this is it possible to get a copy of the config files from some
other location?
--
Cheers
Dg
-
List info/subscribe
On 21 Nov 2012, at 13:41, Olivier Beytrison wrote:
> There's also some conflict because mods-available/sql* are both present
> in package freeradius and freeradius-mysql. Should we not rather select
> files independently in ${raddbdir}/mods-available/ in place of taking
> everyth
There's also some conflict because mods-available/sql* are both present
in package freeradius and freeradius-mysql. Should we not rather select
files independently in ${raddbdir}/mods-available/ in place of taking
everything (*) for the freeradius package ?
>>>
>>> I think there
e or
>>>>> directory
>>>>>
>>>>> Uh oh ? looking at /etc/freeradius, there's only the directories and
>>>>> the symlinks, but not a single file. Great.
>>>>>
>>>>> When looking in the build environnement,
/etc/freeradius, there's only the directories and
>>>> the symlinks, but not a single file. Great.
>>>>
>>>> When looking in the build environnement, in
>>>> debian/freeradius/etc/freeradius, all the files are present.
>>>>
>
, but not a single file. Great.
>>>
>>> When looking in the build environnement, in
>>> debian/freeradius/etc/freeradius, all the files are present.
>>>
>>> During package creation, the files are correctly grabbed as per
>>> debian/freeradius.i
>> Unable to open file "/etc/freeradius/radiusd.conf": No such file or
>> directory
>>
>> Uh oh ? looking at /etc/freeradius, there's only the directories and
>> the symlinks, but not a single file. Great.
>>
>> When looking in the build e
ce.
> Unable to open file "/etc/freeradius/radiusd.conf": No such file or
> directory
>
> Uh oh ? looking at /etc/freeradius, there's only the directories and
> the symlinks, but not a single file. Great.
>
> When looking in the build environnement, in
> d
tion, and package are successfully made. After
installing the package, freeradius doesn't start.
Unable to open file "/etc/freeradius/radiusd.conf": No such file or
directory
Uh oh ? looking at /etc/freeradius, there's only the directories and
the symlinks, but not a single f
Olivier Beytrison wrote:
> your change in checkrad.mk moved the binary from sbindir do bindir. Is
> this change wanted or not? If yes i'll update the
> debin/freeradius.install accordingly. if not we'll need a
> install.sbindir in Makefile
I'll go fix that.
Thanks for the patience. Switching
Olivier Beytrison wrote:
> Possible fix : move example.pl in ${docdir}/examples/example.pl
I've just fixed the old Makefile. The new one is fine.
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
On 20.11.2012 14:44, Alan DeKok wrote:
> Olivier Beytrison wrote:
>> Well even with the libfreeradius-eap.so packaged into libfreeradius3,
>> eap is not starting. I checked on my other systems running 2.2.10, but
>> built with libtool and libltdl, the rlm_eap.so is linked with
>> libfreeradius-ea
ient (last reference in src/all.mk)
INSTALL radwho
INSTALL radlast
INSTALL radtest
INSTALL radzap
INSTALL checkrad
INSTALL dhclient
mkdir: cannot create directory
`/opt/src/freeradius/FR3/freeradius-server/debian/tmp/etc/freeradius':
File exists
make[1]: *** [install.dirs] Error 1
make[1]: Le
Olivier Beytrison wrote:
> Other changes broke the make install process.
Whoops, typo. I've pushed another fix.
Alan Dekok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Olivier Beytrison wrote:
> Well even with the libfreeradius-eap.so packaged into libfreeradius3,
> eap is not starting. I checked on my other systems running 2.2.10, but
> built with libtool and libltdl, the rlm_eap.so is linked with
> libfreeradius-eap.
I've just pushed a fix. Please check it
efined and not found.
INSTALL radclient
INSTALL radiusd
INSTALL radsniff
INSTALL radmin
INSTALL radattr
INSTALL radconf2xml
INSTALL radwho
INSTALL install.bindir
install: install.bindir does not exist
make[1]: ***
[/opt/src/freeradius/FR3/freeradius-server/debian/tmp/usr/bin/radlast]
Error 1
mak
reeradius -X output below
>
> the debian package doesn't include the libfreeradius-eap.so. maybe add
> it to the libfreeradius package
It should be part of a rlm_eap package, if that exists.
> /etc/freeradius/mods-enabled/eap[17]: Failed to link to module
> 'rlm_eap':
> Now the service start and start loading the configuration, but fails at
> rlm_eap. freeradius -X output below
>
> the debian package doesn't include the libfreeradius-eap.so. maybe add
> it to the libfreeradius package
>
> diff --git a/debian/libfreeradius3.insta
that radmin
> wasn't found during the package creation. Had to add "radmin.mk" in
> src/main/all.mk SUBMAKEFILES in order to have it.
>
> Package are now created correctly. I'll try installing them now.
Installation failed the first time. still missing the mods-enabled.
co
>>
>> Yeah you have a typo, you have mods.enabled, it should be mods-enabled?
>>
>> I'm also working on this, there was a bug in the MySQL configure script that
>> may have been causing issues with the .so not being built correctly.
>> PostgreSQL and a few others were also missing boilermake fil
>>>
>>> I made a fresh clone this morning, and I've been able to make the
>>> packages after a few changes to the files in de debian directory. Those
>>> files refer to a lot of element which don't seems to exist any more in FR3
>>>
>
On 19 Nov 2012, at 10:47, Olivier Beytrison wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes i've been working on this too today as I need debian packages for a
>>> customer, and that's exactly the point where I got to.
>>>
>>> I'm going to continue with it on m
Olivier Beytrison wrote:
> BTW I'm far from being a debian package expert (in fact it's the first
> time I really dig into the package building process).
Welcome to the club. I do "configure" scripts, GNU Makefiles, shell
scripts, C, Perl, SQL, ...
> Here's
>>
>> Yes i've been working on this too today as I need debian packages for a
>> customer, and that's exactly the point where I got to.
>>
>> I'm going to continue with it on monday. Feel free to pull from master, it
>> contains a few more fix
>
> Yes i've been working on this too today as I need debian packages for a
> customer, and that's exactly the point where I got to.
>
> I'm going to continue with it on monday. Feel free to pull from master, it
> contains a few more fixes.
Hi,
I made a f
>
> Tried with my git clone from yesterday but still got a weird error at
> the begining of the package creation. cloned a fresh copy, added a few
> arguments to debian/rules. Compilation is ok, weird error persist.
>
> see http://pastebin.com/JDHm5dWq
Yes i've been worki
it fails further
>> down.
>
> I have no idea why the extra .libs is there. Where is RLM_LIBS adding
> the .libs? It shouldn't be doing that.
>
>> --sourcedir=/opt/src/freeradius/FR3/freeradius-server/debian/tmp/ -p
>> libfreeradius3
>> dh_install: libfreer
BS adding
the .libs? It shouldn't be doing that.
> --sourcedir=/opt/src/freeradius/FR3/freeradius-server/debian/tmp/ -p
> libfreeradius3
> dh_install: libfreeradius3 missing files
> (usr/lib/freeradius/libfreeradius*-3.*.so), aborting
Hmm... that should be there.
> usr/lib/
On 16.11.2012 14:21, Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
>
> On 16 Nov 2012, at 12:58, Olivier Beytrison wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Just a quick question, before I loose too much time on this. Is the
>> debian build system on the master repository working ?
>
> I
On 16 Nov 2012, at 12:58, Olivier Beytrison wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Just a quick question, before I loose too much time on this. Is the
> debian build system on the master repository working ?
I've had issues with it, but haven't had time to track down the cause,
Hello,
Just a quick question, before I loose too much time on this. Is the
debian build system on the master repository working ? I'm getting hard
time to build the deb packages.
git clone from yesterday, ubuntu 12.04 LTS
Olivier
--
Olivier Beytrison
Network & Security Enginee
and iodbc are (mostly) driver-compatible.
> This is actually working. But I found out downloading the freeradius tarbal
> that it can't use the rlm_sql_unixodbc driver, because in the debian/rules
> file they compile it using the flag:
>
> --without-rlm_sql_unixodbc
&
]
| quit
|
+---+
This is actually working. But I found out downloading the freeradius tarbal
that it can't use the rlm_sql_unixodbc driver, because in the debian/
Dmitry Korzhevin wrote:
> Can you please advice good howto/guide to configure l2tp with radius
> server?
Read the documentation for the l2tp server to see which attributes it
needs. Then, configure that.
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.
Hello guys,
Can you please advice good howto/guide to configure l2tp with radius
server? I am already have configured pptp (poptop) and ipsec
(strongSwan) on server, getting user logins and passwords from file. Now
planning to use freeradius for auth.
Best Regards,
Dmitry
---
Dmitry KORZ
did the trick, thanks :D (had been making a silly mistake with one of the
cert files)
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 3:05 AM, Alan DeKok wrote:
> austin wonderly wrote:
> > hello, thanks for the tip, although unfortunately im am still getting
> > problems
>
> Google "EAP-TLS freeradius" gets you this
austin wonderly wrote:
> hello, thanks for the tip, although unfortunately im am still getting
> problems
Google "EAP-TLS freeradius" gets you this link:
http://freeradius.org/doc/EAPTLS.pdf
Follow it, and it WILL WORK.
The Wiki also contains documentation, and points to my web si
Hi...
as i see log says , "Error: TLS Alert read:fatal:unknown CA" . and you
need to specify the certificate Authority in your client when testing.
Certifcate authority is a File called "CA.pem" once you added to the
client error should go away. And make sure debian seve
at 9:17 PM, val john wrote:
> Download the tar.gz file form freeradius , in that file , in folder
> "freeradius-server-xxx/raddb/certs" provide very easy way generate certs
> (./bootstrap) , just copy its its content to the freeradius in debian
> "/etc/
Download the tar.gz file form freeradius , in that file , in folder
"freeradius-server-xxx/raddb/certs" provide very easy way generate certs
(./bootstrap) , just copy its its content to the freeradius in debian
"/etc/freeradius/certs/"
Thank you
-- Forwarded mes
Matthew Newton wrote:
> The fix is in 282c2dfb3d64, or just use v2.1.x. Unfortunately that does
> introduce another bug - you need to install the freeradius-mysql package or
> pull dhcp_sqlippool out of the config, due to it pulling in a mysql file at
> line 18, added in aeee8bb6b840f12c.
I'll
l package or
pull dhcp_sqlippool out of the config, due to it pulling in a mysql file at
line 18, added in aeee8bb6b840f12c. I haven't worked out a clean solution for
that one - I guess dhcp_sqlippool should be in the freeradius-mysql package
instead, as it currently depends on mysql, but t
Eric Geier wrote:
> Trying to build FR 2.1.12 on Debian Squeeze 64-bit. I'm building instead of
> using Debian FR packages as I want to include the rlm_raw module (which I
> slightly modified and is supposed to work in FR 2.x...got from another post
> here).
>
> I enter &quo
Trying to build FR 2.1.12 on Debian Squeeze 64-bit. I'm building instead of
using Debian FR packages as I want to include the rlm_raw module (which I
slightly modified and is supposed to work in FR 2.x...got from another post
here).
I enter "fakeroot dpkg-buildpackage -b -uc&qu
Ribeiro wrote:
> > Indeed just found configure make works fine; been the whole time
> > trying to build a deb package.
> > fakeroot dpkg-buildpackage -b -uc doesn't work.
>
> I usually just use dpkg-buildpackage -b. Mostly with Ubuntu's debian
> directory, bu
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Rui Ribeiro wrote:
> Indeed just found configure make works fine; been the whole time
> trying to build a deb package.
> fakeroot dpkg-buildpackage -b -uc doesn't work.
I usually just use dpkg-buildpackage -b. Mostly with Ubuntu's debian
direct
Indeed just found configure make works fine; been the whole time
trying to build a deb package.
fakeroot dpkg-buildpackage -b -uc doesn't work.
Compiling them would be enough for you. I doubt a ubuntu deb package
will satisfy debian dependencies.
Best regards,
Rui
--
Fajar
On Sun, Jan 15,
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Rui Ribeiro wrote:
>
> Hi list,
>
> Been trying to compile freeradius 2.1.12 in Debian Squeeze following the
> directions of http://wiki.freeradius.org/Build to no avail. Also tried the
> suggestion in previous posts of cutting out --enable
Hi list,
Been trying to compile freeradius 2.1.12 in Debian Squeeze following the
directions of http://wiki.freeradius.org/Build to no avail. Also tried the
suggestion in previous posts of cutting out --enable-developer, and of
compiling libtool myself.
One of the problems is freeradius is
Removing
--enable-developer \
in debian/rules solved that problem.
With best regards,
Norbert Wegener
Atos IT Solutions and Services
AIS MS NC PSU SDC
Bruchstraße 5
45883 Gelsenkirchen, Germany
Tel.: +49 (209) 94565716
Fax: +49 (201) 8165581284
rver/src'
make[3]: *** [all] Error 2
make[3]: Leaving directory `/root/git/freeradius-server/src'
make[2]: *** [src] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/git/freeradius-server'
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/git/freeradius-server'
make: ***
Wegener, Norbert wrote:
> According to
> http://wiki.freeradius.org/Build#Building+Debian+packages
> a debian package can be compiled from freeradius sources.
> On squeeze it fails. Mabe it has to do with libtool?
> Is there a known workaround?
Arg... the system has lt_dladvise_
1 - 100 of 436 matches
Mail list logo
