Re: Autotools related problems in freeradius 1.1.6

2007-04-24 Thread Kostas Zorbadelos
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 01:12:26PM +0200, Alan DeKok wrote: > Kostas Zorbadelos wrote: > > I disagree with you on this one Alan. I discovered all these issues I > > mention the hard way, after our radius server stopped running in > > random times (after a failure in rad_assert() in request_list.c a

Re: Autotools related problems in freeradius 1.1.6

2007-04-24 Thread Alan DeKok
Kostas Zorbadelos wrote: > This is exactly what I did. The reason I mention it is because I think > the default should be sane in future releases of freeradius (that is > developer options switched off by default). That's the intent, yes. > I disagree with you on this one Alan. I discovered all

Re: Autotools related problems in freeradius 1.1.6

2007-04-24 Thread Kostas Zorbadelos
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 04:39:22PM +0200, Alan DeKok wrote: > Kostas Zorbadelos wrote: > > If I do > > > > ./configure --prefix=/opt/freeradius > > > > the build scripts presume that --enable-developer is true. > > That may be an issue only in 1.1.6. You should be able to change it > by doin

Re: Autotools related problems in freeradius 1.1.6

2007-04-23 Thread Alan DeKok
Kostas Zorbadelos wrote: > If I do > > ./configure --prefix=/opt/freeradius > > the build scripts presume that --enable-developer is true. That may be an issue only in 1.1.6. You should be able to change it by doing --disable-developer. > This has > the effect that -DNDEBUG is not defined i