Sure.
I think that I want a small change to the way master handles the rpath,
so I will work on that, and then we can move it to stable.
- Original Message -
From: "Bernhard Miklautz"
To: "Kevin Dalley"
Cc: "Freerdp-devel"
Sent: Thursday, December
I just realized that master handles rpath correctly. I had been on stable for
a while
and didn't notice that master was fixed.
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin Dalley"
To: bmikla...@thinstuff.at
Cc: "Freerdp-devel"
Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 4:31:16
d old CLI. I didn't have an option for changing CLI. Open source development
is sometimes a thankless job.
- Original Message -
From: "Marc-André Moreau"
To: "Kevin Dalley"
Cc: "Freerdp-devel" , "Christian Nilsson"
Sent: Tuesday,
--- Original Message -
From: "Bernhard Miklautz"
To: "Kevin Dalley"
Cc: "Freerdp-devel"
Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 4:06:06 PM
Subject: Re: [Freerdp-devel] CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX does not load correctly
library
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 03:25:05PM -08
I tried using CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX, but xfreerdp does not know about the
existence
of the installed shared libraries. I read the CMAKE documentation on RPATH
and CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX.
http://www.cmake.org/cmake/help/v2.8.8/cmake.html#variable:CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX
http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/CMak
Alex,
What do you think of compiling the code in 2 ways,
one for each CLI? Install the one you want.
The names could differ, I suppose, but copying
the executables would not change the behavior.
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Dalley
To: Alex Bligh
Cc: freerdp-devel
-
From: Alex Bligh
To: Kevin Dalley
Cc: Alex Bligh , Stephen Dowdy ,
freerdp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 11:46:34 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [Freerdp-devel] Why is there a change in the command line
interface?
On 4 Dec 2012, at 18:07, Kevin Dalley wrote:
> Please don&#x
for years, which probably means forever.
This isn't necessarily bad, if the new interface is an improvement. However, it
is a reality. That is a lot of developers.
- Original Message -
From: "Marc-André Moreau"
To: "Kevin Dalley"
Cc: "Freerdp-devel
Please don't use argv[0] to determine the behavior. This is confusing.
It should be possible to make a link to a program and have it behave in
the same way as the original program.
Also, it violates the GNU standards.
http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/User-Interfaces.html#User-Inter
lopt2 host1:3389
> -opt-for-host1 host2:3399 -opt-for-host2
>
> This -v option dosn't make sense to me.
>
> Regards
> Christian
>
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 8:19 AM, Kevin Dalley wrote:
>
>> OK. I understand it a little bit more. I hadn't realized that
ified with /v:[:port]
- Original Message -
From: Marc-André Moreau
To: Kevin Dalley
Cc: Alex Bligh , Freerdp-devel
, Alexis Moinet
Sent: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 20:15:41 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [Freerdp-devel] Why is there a change in the command line
interface?
Hey, I haven't magically brou
"/", then the
command line would be assumed to be
windows style.
- Original Message -
From: "Alex Bligh"
To: "Marc-André Moreau"
Cc: "Alex Bligh" , "Kevin Dalley" ,
"Freerdp-devel" , "Alexis Moinet"
Sent: Sunday, De
Alexis makes a good point in the ps.
If you are used to one type of syntax, it is difficult to follow a new syntax.
If every developer created a different type of syntax, it would be extremely
difficult to use Linux.
- Original Message -
From: Alexis Moinet
To: Freerdp-devel
Sent: Sun
Keeping backwards compatibility sounds like a wonderful idea.
If you are willing to do the work to support both, that sounds good. I suspect
that it will take some work to make sure that everything works well.
Part of my problem is that I will have to support old versions of xfreerdp,
as well as
I recently noticed that the master branch of FreeRDP has a change in the
command line interface.
The new command line options no longer follow the POSIX standard for command
line interface or the GNU standard for CLI.
Here are references for both standards:
POSIX:
http://pubs.opengroup.org/
What is the timeline on 1.0.2? I have at least one fix I want to get into it,
but I want to do additional testing, if there is time.
- Original Message -
From: "Bernhard Miklautz"
To: freerdp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2012 3:15:14 PM
Subject: [Freerdp-devel] v
I notice that unit tests fail in both the latest git master, and in stable.
Are unit run regularly? Should I try to create a fix for stable so that the
tests pass?
--
Don't let slow site performance ruin your business.
I'm particularly interested in the "--from-stdin" command line option and the
fixes to parenting a window in xfreerdp.
I created a patch to add these 2 features to freerdp-1.0.1, but it would be
nice to point people toward a stable release,
rather than a patched release.
Have you tried these options:
--no-nla --ignore-certificate
The --sec lets you choose the security protocol.
Hybrid is related to CredSSP
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc240806%28v=prot.10%29.aspx
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Cook"
To: "Vishal K. Gandhi" , freerdp-dev
19 matches
Mail list logo
