Re: [Freerdp-devel] FreeRDP 1.0 Final Sprint

On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 4:16 AM, Peter Volkov wrote: > Hi, I'm still trying to use latest git (rebuilt yesterday) and it still > fails to connect. Is it supposed to work at this point? > Yes it is supposed to work Please be as descriptive as possible, there's not much that can be done with the l

Re: [Freerdp-devel] FreeRDP 1.0 Final Sprint

Hi, I'm still trying to use latest git (rebuilt yesterday) and it still fails to connect. Is it supposed to work at this point? -- Peter. В Пнд, 19/09/2011 в 12:40 +0400, Peter Volkov пишет: > В Вск, 18/09/2011 в 14:31 -0400, Marc-André Moreau пишет: > > FreeRDP 1.0 is now getting increasingly cl

Re: [Freerdp-devel] FreeRDP 1.0 Final Sprint

On 25/09/11 18:53, Alexis Moinet wrote : > On 25/09/11 18:00, Marc-André Moreau wrote : >> >> >> On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Alexis Moinet > > wrote: >> >> Hello >> >> I'm not sure of what you mean, it seems to me that you already have such >> options

Re: [Freerdp-devel] FreeRDP 1.0 Final Sprint

On 25/09/11 18:00, Marc-André Moreau wrote : > > > On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Alexis Moinet > wrote: > > Hello > > I'm not sure of what you mean, it seems to me that you already have such > options > > for instance WITH_DEBUG_RAIL is already lis

Re: [Freerdp-devel] FreeRDP 1.0 Final Sprint

On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Alexis Moinet wrote: > Hello > > I'm not sure of what you mean, it seems to me that you already have such > options > > for instance WITH_DEBUG_RAIL is already listed in ccmake (and, I suppose, > also within the GUI ?) and can be set to ON/OFF (defined/not defined)

Re: [Freerdp-devel] FreeRDP 1.0 Final Sprint

Hello I'm not sure of what you mean, it seems to me that you already have such options for instance WITH_DEBUG_RAIL is already listed in ccmake (and, I suppose, also within the GUI ?) and can be set to ON/OFF (defined/not defined) (also running "cmake -DWITH_DEBUG_RAIL=ON" should work too) the

Re: [Freerdp-devel] FreeRDP 1.0 Final Sprint

quick question for cmake experts: how can we add those debug options such that they are listed in the cmake GUI and easily selectable without having to manually add those define statements? On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Marc-André Moreau < marcandre.mor...@gmail.com> wrote: > can you add: > >

Re: [Freerdp-devel] FreeRDP 1.0 Final Sprint

can you add: #define WITH_DEBUG_RAIL 1 in libfreerdp-rail/librail.h and try again? On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Michael Osborne wrote: > ** > On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 15:42 -0400, Marc-André Moreau wrote: > > > Can you uncomment the following line in orders.h: > > //#define WITH_DEBUG_ORDERS

Re: [Freerdp-devel] FreeRDP 1.0 Final Sprint

On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 15:42 -0400, Marc-André Moreau wrote: > > Can you uncomment the following line in orders.h: > //#define WITH_DEBUG_ORDERS 1 > > > Recompile, then run again and see what was the last graphical update > before the crash? That line isn't orders.h in current git, so I adde

Re: [Freerdp-devel] FreeRDP 1.0 Final Sprint

Il 19/09/2011 21:42, Marc-André Moreau wrote: > > There still seems to be a problem with current git. I can now start > a remoteapp program but as soon as I started to type, it segfaulted > with: > > xfreerdp[14387]: segfault at 4 ip 00adfd5a sp b752bdf0 error 4 in > libfreerdp-

Re: [Freerdp-devel] FreeRDP 1.0 Final Sprint

On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Michael Osborne wrote: > ** > On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 14:35 -0400, Marc-André Moreau wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 5:54 AM, Michele Petrazzo < > michele.petra...@unipex.it> wrote: > > I'm making some tries from two or three weeks ago for see if the > remote

Re: [Freerdp-devel] FreeRDP 1.0 Final Sprint

On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 14:35 -0400, Marc-André Moreau wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 5:54 AM, Michele Petrazzo > wrote: > > I'm making some tries from two or three weeks ago for see if > the > remoteapp function starts to work, but like now I have a > se

Re: [Freerdp-devel] FreeRDP 1.0 Final Sprint

Hi John, I just added the missing code for fast-path pointer PDUs. xfreerdp should now be able to receive pointer updates in both slow-path and fast-path mode. On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:58 PM, John Eke wrote: > Ill work on issues #90 and #91. Could someone please assign those to me > (johneke)?

Re: [Freerdp-devel] FreeRDP 1.0 Final Sprint

On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 5:54 AM, Michele Petrazzo < michele.petra...@unipex.it> wrote: > Il 18/09/2011 20:31, Marc-André Moreau ha scritto: > > Hello FreeRDP developers, > > > > Hello, > > > As for users, please keep reporting issues, it helps having a better > > idea of the current status of Free

Re: [Freerdp-devel] FreeRDP 1.0 Final Sprint

Ill work on issues #90 and #91. Could someone please assign those to me (johneke)? Couldn't do it myself - John E On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 09:59 -0400, Marc-André Moreau wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 8:55 AM, John Eke > wrote: > Good stuff Marc-André, I could work on the xfreerdp c

Re: [Freerdp-devel] FreeRDP 1.0 Final Sprint

On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 8:55 AM, John Eke wrote: > Good stuff Marc-André, I could work on the xfreerdp cursor support > issue. There could be another issue however which I eluded to before: > Right after connecting to an RDP server I noticed I never got initial > cursor create messages. Subsequen

Re: [Freerdp-devel] FreeRDP 1.0 Final Sprint

Good stuff Marc-André, I could work on the xfreerdp cursor support issue. There could be another issue however which I eluded to before: Right after connecting to an RDP server I noticed I never got initial cursor create messages. Subsequently however I would get messages to switch to cursors which

Re: [Freerdp-devel] FreeRDP 1.0 Final Sprint

Il 18/09/2011 20:31, Marc-André Moreau ha scritto: > Hello FreeRDP developers, > Hello, > As for users, please keep reporting issues, it helps having a better > idea of the current status of FreeRDP 1.0. > I'm making some tries from two or three weeks ago for see if the remoteapp function star

Re: [Freerdp-devel] FreeRDP 1.0 Final Sprint

Hello guys. В Вск, 18/09/2011 в 14:31 -0400, Marc-André Moreau пишет: > FreeRDP 1.0 is now getting increasingly closer to completeness for a > potential 1.0 release. The list of issues currently marked for 1.0 is > listed here: > https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/issues?milestone=1&state=open >