Re: [Freerdp-devel] Memory consumption 0.8.2 vs. 1.0.1 (current version from git)

2012-08-28 Thread Gallauner Roman
2012 22:48 To: Jay Sorg; Gallauner Roman Cc: freerdp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: [Freerdp-devel] Memory consumption 0.8.2 vs. 1.0.1 (current version from git) It would not be so hard to add a couple of registry key settings to allow fine tuning of cache parameters in the current

Re: [Freerdp-devel] Memory consumption 0.8.2 vs. 1.0.1 (current version from git)

2012-08-28 Thread Marc-André Moreau
:* ‎August‎ ‎28‎, ‎2012 ‎4‎:‎45‎ ‎PM *To:* Jay Sorg *CC:* freerdp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net *Subject:* Re: [Freerdp-devel] Memory consumption 0.8.2 vs. 1.0.1 (current version from git) Saw that the virtual size of the process growed steadily when the screen content changes in the session - no growth

Re: [Freerdp-devel] Memory consumption 0.8.2 vs. 1.0.1 (current version from git)

2012-08-28 Thread Gallauner Roman
st 2012 19:29 To: Gallauner Roman Cc: freerdp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Freerdp-devel] Memory consumption 0.8.2 vs. 1.0.1 (current version from git) > We use some very memory constrained linux thin clients (down to 64 MB > RAM) and we noticed that 0.8.2 used about 14 MB (virt

Re: [Freerdp-devel] Memory consumption 0.8.2 vs. 1.0.1 (current version from git)

2012-08-28 Thread Gallauner Roman
@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Freerdp-devel] Memory consumption 0.8.2 vs. 1.0.1 (current version from git) > We use some very memory constrained linux thin clients (down to 64 MB > RAM) and we noticed that 0.8.2 used about 14 MB (virtual size) and > 1.0.1 (current version from git) goes up to

Re: [Freerdp-devel] Memory consumption 0.8.2 vs. 1.0.1 (current version from git)

2012-08-28 Thread Jay Sorg
> We use some very memory constrained linux thin clients (down to 64 MB > RAM) and we noticed that 0.8.2 used about 14 MB (virtual size) and 1.0.1 > (current version from git) goes up to about 76 MB - of course the poor > little boxes freeze or crash or show other strange behavior then :-D > Is thi