Hi everyone,
I am pretty new with Freesurfer and I'd be very grateful if some of you could
help me out with the following issue.
I have a subject which has been processed both with Freesurfer and Civet-CLASP,
and I would love to compare the two output cortical thickness maps. I have
resampled
I have subject proceed with Freesurfer 4.30 and Freesurfer 5.1. The subjects
proceed with Freesurfer 5.1 appears to have thicker cortex than in Freesurfer
4.30. When I correlate the cortical thickness against continuous variables like
IQ, I get a difference. Is this expected since I get a
Hi Gabriele
unfortunately I suspect what you say is true - it's not that easy unless
their vertices happen to be spatially aligned with our vertex locations,
which is unlikely. You are better off computing the coordinates of each
vertex then finding the nearest vertex on the other surface, or
Hi Knut
have you visually inspected the surfaces? Certainly you will get
differences, and our hope would be that 5.1 is more accurate.
cheers
Bruce
On Mon, 5 Dec
2011, Knut J Bjuland wrote:
I have subject proceed with Freesurfer 4.30 and Freesurfer 5.1. The subjects
proceed with Freesurfer
*Hi everyone *
*I got this error while running one of my subjects*
*
*
mri_ca_register: GCAMwrite(transforms/talairach.m3z) failed
ERROR: mri_ca_register with non-zero status 252
but continuing despite the error
#--
#@# CA Reg Inv Thu Nov 24 05:15:42 EST
Dear Allison,
Thank you very much for your email.
1). I wonder if the GLM group analysis that is described on the webpage you
sent me (as instructed by Doug and Bruce, I was aware of this webpage and I
used it for my
QDEC studies but I am not sure if can be used for DTI data analysis) can
Hi Antonella,
1). I wonder if the GLM group analysis that is described on the webpage you
sent me (as instructed by Doug and Bruce, I was aware of this webpage and I
used it for my
QDEC studies but I am not sure if can be used for DTI data analysis) can be
used for a DTI group analysis.
Linda Zhang wrote:
Hi Doug,
Thanks for the clarification. If I were to add another two class
variables (patient and subject, for example) and I wanted to see if
they affected thickness, assuming they come after gender in the fsgd
file, would the contrasts then be [0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dear all:
I am doing an FA group study (controls vs. patients without any
covariant so my C = +1.0 -1.0) and I want to see if there are
any clusters that survives by multiple comparison so I ran:
mri_glmfit --y group-fa-tal.nii --mask group-mask-tal.nii\
--fsgd
Hi Antonella, are there any clusters listed in the summary file? It
might be that you just don't have any clusters that survive.
doug
Antonella Kis wrote:
Dear all:
I am doing an FA group study (controls vs. patients without any
covariant so my C = +1.0 -1.0) and I want to see if
You can try it with tkmedit
tkmedit fsaverage orig.mgz -overlay
/media/1Tra/Antonella_2011/DTI_FS/dtrecon/group_analysis.glmdir/contrast/sig.mgh
Also, in freeview try reducing the threshold to see if something pops up.
doug
Antonella Kis wrote:
Hi Doug,
Many thanks for your answer. Yes,
All,
I've been trying to use mri_cvs_register on a 64-bit mac and received the
following error (below). Google found a couple of hits that others are having
this problem but no solution. I'm running the most recent version from version
5.1 with the patch on the release notes page ($Id:
Hi Peter,
Could you attach the log files from your process?
Lilla
On Mon, 5 Dec 2011, Peter J. Molfese wrote:
All,
I've been trying to use mri_cvs_register on a 64-bit mac and received the
following error (below). Google found a couple of hits that others are
having this problem but
1.5GB is probably not enough. typically we recommend that recon-all
have at least 3GB available to it, which can be very hard to do on a
virtual machine (since windows takes 1GB, the vm linux takes another
1GB, which leaves 2GB for processes). i would setup your vm to use the
maximum memory
Hi Doug,
Many thanks for your answer. Yes, there are four clusters as you can see below:
# Reporting Coordinates in MNI305 Space
# Cluster Size(n) Size(mm^3) MNIX MNIY MNIZ Max#
GRFCWP
1 200 1600.0 8.00 5.00 -17.00 -5.47411
0.0
Dear All,
I was trying to find an explanation of the color map: min, Mid, MAx and Offset
values in Freeview. Can someone please explain me if I have the color map set
it up as HEAT what is the meaning of this values if for example I am viewing
the existing clusters after multiple comparison
They are standard parameters to linearly map a voxel value (val) into
heat-scale color (c), something like this:
first apply offset:
val = val + offset
then:
if val = min, c = black
if min val mid, c = between black and red
if val = mid, c = red
if mid val max, c = between red and
Dear Freesurfers,
I'm looking for a suitable solution for Volumetry of the auditory Cortex.
As a proxy for Heschl Gyrus I tried the Gyrus temporalis transversus label
- as it is posted in the Color LUT. After typing:
asegstats2table --subjects WD \
--segno 1034 \
--tablefile aseg.vol.table
I
Hi Eunjin
what version are you using?
Bruce
On Tue, 6 Dec 2011, Eunjin Yoon wrote:
Dear, Freesurfer users
I am processing 1.5T MR images, and found some overlapping of the
surfaces from one hemisphere to another.
I attached captured images of that subject. you can find the error
center of
Hi Doug,
Sure, my fsgd file contained two groups originally, M and F. I had three
continuous variables, which were Age, MMSE, Education. I wanted to test
whether thickness is correlated with MMSE scores after controlling for
gender, age and education. I now want to add two more class variables
Hi Bruce,
I'm using Freesurfer version 5.1.0.
On Dec 6, 2011, at 10:56 AM, Bruce Fischl wrote:
Hi Eunjin
what version are you using?
Bruce
On Tue, 6 Dec 2011, Eunjin Yoon wrote:
Dear, Freesurfer users
I am processing 1.5T MR images, and found some overlapping of the
surfaces from
21 matches
Mail list logo