Hi Gabriel, I don't have experience with the MR-PET yet. Why do you
think there is a problem? Try running wm-anat-snr on this subject. In
general, you don't want to be smoothing/denoising the anatomical
doug
On 6/18/13 1:13 PM, obre...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
Hi,
I've started
Hi Maria, can you elaborate on exactly what you have done? Is the data
the same and you are only changing the version of QDEC? What is the
nature of the difference? Can you send pics or stats?
doug
On 6/18/13 6:06 AM, Maria Kharitonova wrote:
Hi,
I'm learning how to use QDEC and was
try now
On 6/18/13 9:37 PM, amirhossein manzouri wrote:
I have version 5.1 so please recreate the links!
BR
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Douglas Greve
gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
Hi Amir, if you are using 5.2 or 5.3, then you should already
Hi Marcos, it is weird that the posterior*.mgz does not have that info.
Maybe Koen or Eugenio know why. In the mean time, you can use
mri_convert to change/set the parameters, eg
mri_convert in.mgz out.mgz -tr 0 -ti 0 -te 0 -flip_angle 0
doug
On 6/18/13 2:50 PM, Marcos Martins da Silva
I use curl to download in MAC with the links you mentioned and it is not
there!
amir% curl -O
ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/surfreg
% Total% Received % Xferd Average Speed TimeTime Time
Current
Dload Upload Total
Dear DTI experts,
I am trying to understand how to interpret tract length volume
measurements that TRACULA provides. For example, let’s say a clinical
population differs from a control group in mean FA of a particular
tract, and tract length volume are comparable across the 2 groups.
I think
read_curv.m should do the trick
On Wed, 19 Jun 2013, Jürgen Hänggi wrote:
Dear Bruce
Yes, the .max and the .min files were produced, but how to access the values
in it. Is there a possibility to import these files into MATLAB?
Thanks in advance
Cheers
Jürgen
On [DATE], Bruce Fischl
I knew you would have a clean solution. :-)
Thank you, Doug.
Em Ter, 2013-06-18 às 23:45 -0700, Douglas Greve escreveu:
Hi Marcos, it is weird that the posterior*.mgz does not have that
info. Maybe Koen or Eugenio know why. In the mean time, you can use
mri_convert to change/set the
Dear Freesurfer experts,
I have a question about fitting linear mixed models to mass-univariate
data using the lme tools in matlab.
I am currently trying to compute the initial vertex-wise temporal
covariance estimates by [lhTh0lhRe] =
lme_mass_fit_EMinit(X,[2],ni,lhcortex,3]
However, I
Dear FS team,
I tried to run this command
asegstats2table --subjects bert ernie fred margaret --meas volume
--tablefile aseg_stats.txt
But got this error,permission denied,
SUBJECTS_DIR : /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects
Parsing the .stats files
Building the table..
Writing the table to
Dear FreeSurfer Experts,
I am attempting to construct surfaces that are 1, 2, 3, and 4 mm
interior from the GM/WM boundary (?h.white). So going gradually deeper
into white matter from the GM/WM boundary. I have successfully used
mris_fill to fill the ?h.white surface and mri_morphology to
Hi
ERROR: MRIthickenThinWMStrands: invalid x,y,z!
Numerical result out of range
Any tips?
S
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is
Hi Chikku,
I think this is a permissions issue. Check that you have write
permissions to where you are trying to write the stats table.
-Louis
On Wed, 19 Jun 2013, Varghese Chikku wrote:
Dear FS team,
I tried to run this command
asegstats2table --subjects bert ernie fred margaret --meas
Hi Jason
you could try using mris_expand with a negative # of millimeters. At 4mm
you will lose a lot of the gyri and the procedure will probably fail, but
for smaller amounts it should work (and is what we've done in the past).
You can also use mris_distance_transform to compute the distance
Hi Gabriel
can you give us details of your acquisition? Why is it so noisy?
Bruce
On Wed, 19 Jun 2013, Gabriel Obregon wrote:
Hi Douglas,
The brainmask volumes are extremely grainy (similar to the raw structurals),
i.e., dark voxels throughout the WM and high-intensity voxels across the
nope, never seen that error. Probably from mri_segment. If you send me the
input volume I'll take a look (check the recon-all.log and see what command
was running when that happened). Also, definitely check it before sending
to make sure it's reasonable
On Wed, 19 Jun 2013,
Sudhin A. Shah
Hi, Doug
Hi, all
This single BASH script line works like a charm for all posterior.mgz
files in a once and keeps the original names (must be in yoursubject/mri
folder).
for f in $(ls posterior*.mgz); do mri_convert -tr 0 -ti 0 -te 0
-flip_angle 0 -i $f -o $f; done
You can also use in a more
Dear Freesurfer experts,
is there a command in Freesurfer to check for correct orientation (LAS vs.
PSR) of T1 images (similar to fslhd in FSL)?
Thank you very much!
Brigitte
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Hi Brigette,
not sure how you could do this except visually. Bring the images up and
verify that the directions that we specify are correct (although of
course this isn't possible for L/R unless you have some type of external
fiducial marker like a vitamin E tablet)
cheers
Bruce
On Wed, 19
Hi FreeSurfer expert,
I am interested in a particular region of the Desikan-Killiany atlas and I'd
like to use it as an ROI image mask in my fMRI analysis.
Could you please suggest how I can do that?
From here (http://ftp.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/CorticalParcellation), I see
that the DK
Hi Daniel,
bbregister is completely independent of the longitudinal stream, so if it
fails, it has other reasons (e.g. bad initial alignment). You could try to
switch the initial alignment to some other methods.
Best, Martin
On Jun 14, 2013, at 3:25 AM, Daniel Garcia
Hi Catherine,
probably you are not using 5.3. otherwise it should recognize the --qdec-long
flag. You can open mris_preproc and take a look (it is a text file), there
should be a qdec-long if you search it.
Best, Martin
On Jun 17, 2013, at 12:04 PM, Catherine Bois c.b...@sms.ed.ac.uk wrote:
Hi Linn,
do you mean the brain mask in the cross sectional runs gets worse after you run
the longitudinal steps (base and long)? That is not really possible, as these
steps don't touch the cross data (only read from it).
If you mean that the brain mask in the long looks worse than in the cross
23 matches
Mail list logo