Re: [Freesurfer] Skull Strip

2019-07-03 Thread Bruce Fischl
you can apply the brainmask to any volume using mri_mask, including the orig if you want. The skull stripping shouldn't amplify noise though. What amplified noise regions do you mean? Maybe you can send a picture? cheers Bruce On Thu, 4 Jul 2019, Admin wrote: External Email -

[Freesurfer] Skull Strip

2019-07-03 Thread Admin
External Email - Use Caution Dear Freesurfer: I am a graduate student of Northeastern University in China, and I do brain image analysis . Now,I want generated a brain mask including the brain but excluding the amplified noise regions after skull strip, but I can't find the

Re: [Freesurfer] Doubts in hippocampal subfields labeling

2019-07-03 Thread Iglesias Gonzalez, Eugenio
External Email - Use Caution Dear Antonin, It is difficult to see what’s going on in the images you sent. Would you mind uploading the subject, or at least sending us the image without the segmentation overlaid (and ideally, a sagittal view as well)? Cheers, /Eugenio -- Juan

Re: [Freesurfer] Error in mris_convert thickness file from ascii format

2019-07-03 Thread Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.
Why do you want to convert it to ascii? We have tools that will smooth it. In any event, you need something like mris_convert -c lh.thickness lh.white lh.thickness.asc On 7/3/2019 6:47 PM, Jee Su Suh wrote: External Email - Use Caution Hello, I am trying to convert ascii files

Re: [Freesurfer] Error in mris_convert thickness file from ascii format

2019-07-03 Thread Bruce Fischl
Hi JeeSu if you look at the help for mris_convert, you'll see this example: Convert a scalar overlay file in "curv" format to ascii: mris_convert -c lh.thickness lh.white lh.thickness.asc which you should follow cheers Bruce On Wed, 3 Jul 2019, Jee Su Suh wrote: External Email

Re: [Freesurfer] Single SUVr for PETsurfer

2019-07-03 Thread miracle ozzoude
External Email - Use Caution thanks doug paul On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 4:10 PM Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. < dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu> wrote: > yes > > On 7/3/2019 4:03 PM, miracle ozzoude wrote: > > External Email - Use Caution > E.g. if there are 68 ROIs, single SUVr for each

Re: [Freesurfer] Single SUVr for PETsurfer

2019-07-03 Thread Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.
yes On 7/3/2019 4:03 PM, miracle ozzoude wrote: External Email - Use Caution E.g. if there are 68 ROIs, single SUVr for each subject will be: (# of voxels in ROI 1*(suvr of ROI1 ) + + # of voxels in ROI 68*(suvr of ROI 68)) _

Re: [Freesurfer] Single SUVr for PETsurfer

2019-07-03 Thread miracle ozzoude
External Email - Use Caution E.g. if there are 68 ROIs, single SUVr for each subject will be: (# of voxels in ROI 1*(suvr of ROI1 ) + + # of voxels in ROI 68*(suvr of ROI 68)) _ __ (# of voxels in ROI 1 +

Re: [Freesurfer] Single SUVr for PETsurfer

2019-07-03 Thread Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.
You can look in the gtm.stats file for all the cortical ROIs. Multiply the uptake value by the number of voxels in the ROI and then divide by the sum of the number of voxels across all ROIs. See https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/PetSurfer here for the identity of the columns in the

Re: [Freesurfer] Single SUVr for PETsurfer

2019-07-03 Thread miracle ozzoude
External Email - Use Caution Over the cortex. On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 2:59 PM Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. < dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu> wrote: > The mean over what area? Whole brain or just cortex? > > On 7/3/2019 2:15 PM, miracle ozzoude wrote: > > External Email - Use Caution

Re: [Freesurfer] Qdec Message to Mailing List

2019-07-03 Thread Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.
Actually, I was able to figure it out. Class h_r_m only has one subject, so you are asking it to compute the slope using a single data point. This is not possible. On 7/3/2019 2:44 PM, Marie Hill wrote: External Email - Use Caution Command line: mri_glmfit --y lh.g4v1.10.mgh --fsgd

Re: [Freesurfer] Single SUVr for PETsurfer

2019-07-03 Thread Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.
The mean over what area? Whole brain or just cortex? On 7/3/2019 2:15 PM, miracle ozzoude wrote: External Email - Use Caution Hello Expert, How do i get a single SUVr value for PETsurfer? Similar to Mean_Thickness from Freesurfer, I want to extract a global/Mean SUVr value for each of

Re: [Freesurfer] Qdec Message to Mailing List

2019-07-03 Thread Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.
Can you send the Xg.dat file? On 7/3/2019 2:44 PM, Marie Hill wrote: External Email - Use Caution Command line: mri_glmfit --y lh.g4v1.10.mgh --fsgd g4v1.fsgd dods --C healthy-vs-bipolar-and-schizophrenia.mtx --C healthy-vs-bipolar.mtx --C healthy-vs-schizophrenia.mtx --C

Re: [Freesurfer] Qdec Message to Mailing List

2019-07-03 Thread Marie Hill
External Email - Use Caution Command line: mri_glmfit --y lh.g4v1.10.mgh --fsgd g4v1.fsgd dods --C healthy-vs-bipolar-and-schizophrenia.mtx --C healthy-vs-bipolar.mtx --C healthy-vs-schizophrenia.mtx --C bipolar-vs-schizophrenia.mtx --C none-vs-risk-allele.mtx --surf fsaverage

[Freesurfer] Single SUVr for PETsurfer

2019-07-03 Thread miracle ozzoude
External Email - Use Caution Hello Expert, How do i get a single SUVr value for PETsurfer? Similar to Mean_Thickness from Freesurfer, I want to extract a global/Mean SUVr value for each of my subjects. Thank you. Paul ___ Freesurfer

[Freesurfer] Trac-all error

2019-07-03 Thread Daniel Callow
External Email - Use Caution Hello, I am running trac-all preproc with the following code setenv FREESURFER_HOME /Applications/freesurfer_dev source $FREESURFER_HOME/SetUpFreeSurfer.csh *#Must set SUBJECTS_DIR to where data is or else uses what was set up when installing

Re: [Freesurfer] Qdec Message to Mailing List

2019-07-03 Thread Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.
can you send the command line, full terminal output, your fsgd file, and the Xg.dat created in the output? On 7/3/2019 11:05 AM, Marie Hill wrote: External Email - Use Caution Thanks. When I run mri-glmfit I get Error: matrix is ill-conditioned or badly scaled. I have normalised

Re: [Freesurfer] Qdec Message to Mailing List

2019-07-03 Thread Marie Hill
External Email - Use Caution Thanks. When I run mri-glmfit I get Error: matrix is ill-conditioned or badly scaled. I have normalised the continuous variable Age. Kind regards, Marie From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu on behalf

Re: [Freesurfer] Qdec Message to Mailing List

2019-07-03 Thread Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.
yes, qdec can only have 2 factors with 2 levels. both qdec and mri_glmfit are linear methods (in fact, qdec just calls mri_glmfit). On 7/3/2019 9:39 AM, Marie Hill wrote: External Email - Use Caution Dear Sir/Madam, Could I post the following message to the mailing list: I am running

Re: [Freesurfer] Differing T1 Acquisition Comparison In Freesurfer

2019-07-03 Thread Bruce Fischl
Hi Kayti it's hard to say a priori. Run them all through and see how bad the scanner effect is. Depending on which scans have which parameters some of your differences may cancel or they may add. cheers Bruce On Wed, 3 Jul 2019, Keith, Kathryn wrote: External Email - Use Caution

Re: [Freesurfer] Differing T1 Acquisition Comparison In Freesurfer

2019-07-03 Thread Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.
You're probably ok if design is balanced across scanner. So if you had two groups that you want to compare, you should make sure that they are represented equally across scanner. On 7/3/2019 9:56 AM, Keith, Kathryn wrote: > External Email - Use Caution > > Hi Bruce, > > Thanks so much

Re: [Freesurfer] Differing T1 Acquisition Comparison In Freesurfer

2019-07-03 Thread Keith, Kathryn
External Email - Use Caution Hi Bruce, Thanks so much for the quick reply. We have images from two studies that have two different T1 acquisitions. Both have 1 mm3 voxels but have different TR's (2300 vs. 2500 ms), TE's (2.26 vs. 2.9 ms), TI's (900 vs 1070 ms), etc. They were

[Freesurfer] Qdec Message to Mailing List

2019-07-03 Thread Marie Hill
External Email - Use Caution Dear Sir/Madam, Could I post the following message to the mailing list: I am running a regression testing for significant difference in cortical volume, thickness etc with 3 factors: diagnosis, genotype and gender, with age as a nuisance factor. I