rerun "trac-all -path" only
> for the subjects that have 1 time point. Then rerun "trac-all -stat" with all
> subjects together. And then tell us what other problem you find :)
>
> Best,
> a.y
>
> On Thu, 20 Aug 2015, Janosch Linkersdörfer wrote:
>
>> Hey An
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: Janosch Linkersdörfer <linkersdoer...@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: visualizing paths stats by voxel
> Date: 3 Nov 2015 09:37:48 CET
> To: Anastasia Yendiki <ayend...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harva
to be the first, eh? :)
Thank you very much,
Janosch
More soon,
a.y
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015, Janosch Linkersdörfer wrote:
Hey Anastasia,
thanks for looking into this.
Am 17.08.2015 um 20:33 schrieb Anastasia Yendiki
ayend...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu:
Hi Janosch - Looking at the stats files
with a single time
point through the longitudinal stream as well?
Yes, I ran the longitudinal stream for all subjects, also for the ones with
only one time point.
Thanks,
Janosch
Best,
a.y
On Sun, 9 Aug 2015, Janosch Linkersdörfer wrote:
Hi Anastasia,
yes, I am. But it looks similar
Hi Anastasia,
yes, I am. But it looks similar in the distributed version :(
Thanks,
Janosch
Am 08.08.2015 um 00:48 schrieb Anastasia Yendiki
ayend...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu:
Hi Janosch - Are you by any chance using the dev version of freeview?
a.y
On Fri, 7 Aug 2015, Janosch
Hi all,
I have a question/problem related to restricting monte carlo cluster correction
to a reduced search space.
I have:
1) created a label including the labels of regions I am interested in
2) used mri_mcsim with the --label flag and the label created in 1) to create
cached monte carlo
Hi Anastasia and others,
I am sorry if I just did a bad job, but I could not find information on how
information from the cortical parcellation is used in the path tracking done by
TRACULA, especially, which cortical labels are used as determinants (seed,
waypoint) for which tracts.
It would
Am 03.03.2015 um 14:42 schrieb Douglas N Greve gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu:
Some of this Martin will have to comment on, but my comments below
On 03/03/2015 12:35 PM, Janosch Linkersdörfer wrote:
Hey Doug,
thanks again! That means, I would do something like:
1.) construct
of
the multi-time point subjects before the 1st stage of analysis.
doug
On 03/02/2015 07:25 PM, Janosch Linkersdörfer wrote:
Hi Doug,
thank you very much for your answer!
Am 02.03.2015 um 11:30 schrieb Douglas N Greve gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu:
You would do the long analysis using
. Can I still use
this method (which would only consider the 3/4 of the subjects) to correct
clusters found in the whole group? Or would it only be valid for correcting
clusters from an LME model for the reduced group?
Thanks,
Janosch
doug
On 02/24/2015 08:35 PM, Janosch Linkersdörfer wrote
Hi all,
I experimented with the different flags for mri_surfcluster and have 2 issues
that I don't understand, it would be great if somebody could enlighten me:
1) When I set --thmin (or --fdr) with --thsign abs, I get what I would expect,
i.e., only clusters with a minimum vertex-wise p-value
Hi Doug and others,
I would like apply (Monte Carlo simulation) cluster correction (as opposed to
the implemented vertex-wise FDR correction) on the results from a longitudinal
study I analyzed using the LME toolbox. The design is unbalanced (different
number of time points, from 1 to 4, per
Hi Don, Jorge, and list,
I would like to do cluster-size based family-wise error correction on the
results of a longitudinal analysis done with the lme toolbox.
As Jorge told me that if I don't use spatiotemporal models, the use of RFT
should be valid, I want to use the script posted on the
Hey Anastasia (and list),
I decided to go with affine registration to MNI when I processed my
longitudinal dataset with Tracula, because I didn't realize that one has the
option to do both MNI and CVS registration in parallel.
Is there a way to rerun Tracula with the CVS option without having
registration, so skip those when you run trac-all -prep to
save time.
Hope this helps,
a.y
On Mon, 9 Feb 2015, Janosch Linkersdörfer wrote:
Hey Anastasia (and list),
I decided to go with affine registration to MNI when I processed my
longitudinal dataset with Tracula, because I didn't
Hi,
I am trying to process diffusion data with the longitudinal TRACULA stream. I
want to specify different bvecs and bvals files per scan in the dmrirc file.
For bvecs this is possible using
bveclist = ...
I tried to use
bvallist = ...
but apparently this does not seem to work because
Hi Janosch - Yes, it assumes that all subjects in your study where scanned
with the same b-values. What is your situation?
a.y
On Thu, 15 Jan 2015, Janosch Linkersdörfer wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to process diffusion data with the longitudinal TRACULA stream. I
want to specify
for statistics along the trajectory of a tract?
Thanks a lot,
Janosch
On Thu, 15 Jan 2015, Janosch Linkersdörfer wrote:
Hi Anastasia,
I am already preparing separate dmrirc files for different subjects (but
including all time points for a specific subject) because that way I can run
them
Hi Freesurfers,
after running through the longitudinal stream and modeling with linear mixed
effect models, I would like to restrict the analysis to only specific ROIs and
run FDR correction for vertices included in them.
- I think I can do this with mri_surfclusters with the --mask option,
Hi list,
I recently switched to the digest mode for the mailing list. Since then, I
don't receive answers to my mails as mails anymore, making it harder to respond
to them (or any other mail on the list).
Does anybody experience the same issues? How did you solve them?
Thanks,
Janosch
Hi all,
I am trying to download the latest version of Tracula from this site
http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/Tracula.
This seems not to be possible at the moment. Are there server problems?
Thanks,
Janosch
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Hi experts,
I wanted to play with Tracula. Strangely, already the first preprocessing step,
i.e., conversion to .nii.gz, fails.
Apparently, mri_convert (falsely) recognizes my dicom files as MGH dicoms
(This looks like an MGH DTI volume). Could this be the reason why it fails?
Thanks,
Hi Martin and Doug,
thanks for your answers!
theoretically it would be sufficient
to rename the longitudinal directories accordingly as the base should
not change at all, only some of the filenames -- not tested!
Did I understand it correctly that if one has gone through the whole
and
in the long directory names and long/mri/transform files. I think these are
all the places where subject names are stored, but no guarantee.
Best Martin
Sent via my smartphone, please excuse brevity.
Original message
From: Janosch Linkersdörfer
Date:10/26/2014 6:05
Hi all,
I wonder whether I can rename subjects after processing has been done and do
further processing or stats on them without running in any problems.
From reading
http://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer%40nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg26244.html, it
seems as if the name of the subject folder
Hi all,
I posted this problem earlier, but did not get an answer, so I am posting it
again, sorry!
---
recon-all runs smoothly for all my subjects but one. It throws the error
mri_watershed Error: indices out of bounds and finishes (see
Hi Martin and all,
I am about to process a large longitudinal dataset (normal development, no
patients) and wanted to ask about the best (i.e., time efficient) strategy for
troubleshooting.
If I understand correctly from
https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/LongitudinalEdits, it might be
Hi all,
recon-all runs smoothly for all my subjects but one. It throws the error
mri_watershed Error: indices out of bounds and finishes (see
https://www.dropbox.com/s/4del0uy8g1qw5az/recon-all.log). The image quality
does not seem to be different...
The error has been discussed on the list
Hi all,
is there a way, to install only freeview not the whole Freesurfer package (on
Mac OS X). Or, alternatively, can somebody please tell me what I can safely
remove after installing the whole package to be able to still run Freeview, but
save the maximum of hard disk space?
I do all
Hi all,
I am a little confused about what the latest Freesurfer version is.
I thought that v5.3.0 from May 15, 2013 would be the latest, but today I saw in
the Tracula update list that there is apparently a version from December 9,
2013.
Could you please clear that up for me?
Thanks,
Thanks, Anastasia!
Am 01.04.2014 um 17:36 schrieb Anastasia Yendiki ayend...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu:
Hi Janosch - The December 9th tracula update is just that, an update to the
tracula code without any changes to the rest of freesurfer.
a.y
On Tue, 1 Apr 2014, Janosch Linkersdörfer wrote
modifying the images is a crucial
point in the process that influences all further steps, and I just don't yet
have a feeling for it...
Thanks,
Janosch
cheers
Bruce
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Janosch Linkersdörfer wrote:
Dear Freesurfers,
I am just getting started using Freesurfer. I
Jan 2014, Janosch Linkersdörfer wrote:
Hi Bruce,
thank you very much for your answer!
Am 15.01.2014 um 14:33 schrieb Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu:
Hi Janosch
it will certainly make your life easier if you don't change the names.
So the subject names are saved
the names of the subject
folders and/or symlink them to another location (with another name) and
continue with further processing.
Thanks,
Janosch
Am 13.01.2014 um 13:34 schrieb Janosch Linkersdörfer
notes4ja...@googlemail.com:
Hi all,
I have 4 years of structural scans from children and 2 from
can, e.g., change the names of the
subject folders and/or symlink them to another location (with another name)
and continue with further processing.
Thanks,
Janosch
Am 13.01.2014 um 13:34 schrieb Janosch Linkersdörfer
notes4ja...@googlemail.com:
Hi all,
I have 4 years
Hi all,
I have 4 years of structural scans from children and 2 from adults. I would
like to analyze the data both cross-sectionally and longitudinally. In the
recommendations for the longitudinal analysis, it says one should process all
images in one folder with the time point in the
Hi experts,
I´m trying to convert original images in native space from the LPBA40-Atlas
(http://www.loni.ucla.edu/Atlases/LPBA40/) from img/hdr to nii/nii.gz.
Conversion always results in a left/right flip. Also, mri_convert complains
that no .mat file is available but there are no mat files
37 matches
Mail list logo