3, 2017 4:55 PM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] ROI labeling?
what do you mean by an average of the mask? Such an average would not be
binary.
On 08/03/2017 04:30 PM, Sadie Marvel wrote:
> And what if I wanted to compute just one ROI mask (for each region) that i
ch you could do with mri_surf2surf)
On 08/03/2017 04:08 PM, Sadie Marvel wrote:
> Hi again Freesurfers,
>
> I am doing a surface based ROI analysis where for each subject,
> isomorphic ROIs of 300 vertices (centered around peak functional
> activations) were found on the
Hi again Freesurfers,
I am doing a surface based ROI analysis where for each subject, isomorphic ROIs
of 300 vertices (centered around peak functional activations) were found on the
fsaverage surface space. I was wondering if I should register these masks that
I have created back to each
Hi Freesurfers,
I am doing a surfaced based ROI analysis on each of my subjects functional
data. Using information from other papers, the size of the ROI really matters
when doing the analysis, and I want to take this information from these papers
and apply them to my own data. However, these
letely
agree.
On 07/12/2017 01:54 PM, Sadie Marvel wrote:
> The command will run now without --wls, but I'm still not sure the output is
> correct.
> Here is my entire output:
> cwd /Freiwald/smarvel/cooked/mygroup4/a_FOB.sm05.lh
> cmdline mri_glmfit.bin --y c1_2/ces.nii --osgm --no-prun
nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 12:19 PM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Subject with missing fMRI data {Disarmed}
it might not be possible to use the frame mask with wls. Does it work
without it?
On 07/09/2017 04:46 PM, Sadie Marvel wro
?Hi list,
I am trying to run mri_glmfit on a group of subjects using the --frame-mask
flag because I want the design to be changed based on which subjects have a
value at a single voxel. This is because I have one subject in my group whose
signal was cut off through parts of their occipital
Greve
<gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Sent: Friday, July 7, 2017 11:57 AM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Subject with missing fMRI data {Disarmed}
Add --no-prune
On 7/7/17 11:38 AM, Sadie Marvel wrote:
?When I use a script like this,
mri_glmfit --y ces.nii --wl
e
<gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 12:58 PM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Subject with missing fMRI data {Disarmed}
yes
On 7/6/17 12:50 PM, Sadie Marvel wrote:
>From using isxconcat-sess to concatenate all of my subjects together, the
>command cr
del. I've not been happy
with this method as it can create some strange results as different voxels will
now have different DOFs.
On 6/29/17 8:49 AM, Sadie Marvel wrote:
Hi List,
I am currently doing a group analysis of 26 subjects, one of which has missing
fMRI data where the signal cuts off throug
Hi List,
I am currently doing a group analysis of 26 subjects, one of which has missing
fMRI data where the signal cuts off through parts of the occipital and temporal
lobes. I was wondering if freesurfer has any way of dealing with this, such as
multiple imputation, or other methods of
11 matches
Mail list logo
