Re: [Freesurfer] Faulty alignment to standard surface

2017-03-15 Thread Bruce Fischl
hemisphere. It seems to think the wrong fold is the central sulcus. > > Thanks, > > Daan? > >       Message: 7 >       Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 19:00:21 -0400 >       From: Douglas Greve <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> >       Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Faulty alignment to

Re: [Freesurfer] Faulty alignment to standard surface

2017-03-15 Thread Daan Wesselink
Dear Bruce, Thank you for your help! This did the trick. Kind regards, Daan - Message: 4 Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 10:58:13 -0400 (EDT) From: Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Faulty alignment to standard surface To: Freesurfer support list <f

Re: [Freesurfer] Faulty alignment to standard surface

2017-03-14 Thread Bruce Fischl
on outlines and BA3a in yellow on the left hemisphere. It seems to think the wrong fold is the central sulcus. Thanks, Daan  Message: 7 Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 19:00:21 -0400 From: Douglas Greve <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Faulty alignment to s

Re: [Freesurfer] Faulty alignment to standard surface

2017-03-14 Thread Daan Wesselink
on the left hemisphere. It seems to think the wrong fold is the central sulcus. Thanks, Daan Message: 7 > Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 19:00:21 -0400 > From: Douglas Greve <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> > Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Faulty alignment to standard surface > To: freesurfer@n

Re: [Freesurfer] Faulty alignment to standard surface

2017-03-12 Thread Douglas Greve
not sure what you mean. Can you send a pic? Is the surface placement on the individual correct (ie, are the white and pial surfaces properly placed on the T1)? On 3/10/17 11:19 AM, Daan Wesselink wrote: Dear experts, I've run the standard recon-all pipeline on a subject, for whom the log

[Freesurfer] Faulty alignment to standard surface

2017-03-10 Thread Daan Wesselink
Dear experts, I've run the standard recon-all pipeline on a subject, for whom the log does not report any errors and the white and pial surface follow the structural nicely. However, the coregistration to the standard surface has gone wrong: it seems like the central sulcus (e.g. labels BA1,