?
Bests,
John
Sent: Saturday, January 30, 2016 at 5:51 AM
From: "Martin Reuter"
To: "Freesurfer support list"
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Longitudinal analysis--mass univariate {Disarmed}
Hi John,
What I mean is there could be a bias in your study design if 99% of group
es the rest at least two times.
>
> Is LME -- mas usnivariate still workable with out a bias ?
>
>
> Bests,
> John
>
> Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2016 at 6:51 AM
> From: "Martin Reuter"
> To: "Freesurfer support list"
> Subject: Re: [F
t"
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Longitudinal analysis--mass univariate
Hi John,
you should check if the number of time points per subject is relatively random across your two patient groups. You don’t want a bias, let’s say one patient group with 2 tp and the other with 3.
You can compare the
Hi John,
you should check if the number of time points per subject is relatively random
across your two patient groups. You don’t want a bias, let’s say one patient
group with 2 tp and the other with 3.
You can compare the atrophy across these two groups easily with LME. Or you can
also test i
Hi Dr Martin,
I have two groups of patients and one group of controls.
The patients scanned multiple times but the number of time points is different between the subjects.
The controls have only one time point.
I aim to :
1. I wanted to study the changes in cortical thickness over time in e
