Hi Vasudev
no, there is no alternative. Computing resources are cheap these days.
Most cluster would let you run all your subjects in a single night.
cheers
Bruce
On Thu,
14 Jul 2016, Dev vasu wrote:
Dear Sir / madam,
I have 50 subjects (25 healthy controls and 25 patients with BLVP)
Dear Sir / madam,
I have 50 subjects (25 healthy controls and 25 patients with BLVP) , I
would like to know how could i generate cortical thickness maps for multi
subject group analysis.
The initial pre-processing with recon-all takes several hours for single
subject, is there any alternate way
Hi Bruce,
Thanks again for your help so far. I had a few follow up questions:
1) As far as mapping the average thickness to fsaverage coords, when I was
constructing the average thickness map I used mris_preproc with --target
fsaverage (and then mri_concat), so it's already in fsaverage
I see. Then measure the thickness normally, then see how it changes in
those directions. You could average the thickness along each A/P coordinate
- that wouldn't be a problem. You just don't want to measure it that way
cheers
Bruce
On Mon, 12 May 2014,
pfot...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
Hi Bruce,
Just to clarify, when you say average the thickness along each A/P
coordinate do you mean by looking up at the average cortical thickness of
each parcellation and then calculating their average from P-A, or is
there another way to find the average thickness of each slice and then see
Hi Panos
I would make an average thickness map in fsaverage space, then in matlab
divvy up the a-p direction into bins (say 100 of them) and compute the
average in each bin based on the a/p coordinate
cheers
Bruce
On Tue, 13 May 2014,
pfot...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
Hi Bruce,
Just to
Hi Bruce,
I see, that's really helpful, thank you!
Best,
Panos
Hi Panos
I would make an average thickness map in fsaverage space, then in matlab
divvy up the a-p direction into bins (say 100 of them) and compute the
average in each bin based on the a/p coordinate
cheers
Bruce
On Tue,
Hi Bruce,
Sorry, I had a last follow up question. I just realized that the resulting
bins will be in the fsaverage space, and hence I wouldn't be able to use
mris_anatomical_stats to calculate the average thickness of the bins,
since the fsaverage subject does not have a wm.mgz file. Did you have
Hi Panos
no, mris_anatomical_stats won't do it. I would map the average thickness
to fsaverage coords, then load that into matlab and go from there using
the [xyz] coords of fsaverage for the binning, which is pretty much
MNI305
cheers
Bruce
On Tue, 13 May 2014, pfot...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Hi Bruce,
I was having issues with the part after that, that is how to calculate the
average thickness of those bins, after I create them. Thanks again
Best,
Panos
Hi Panos
no, mris_anatomical_stats won't do it. I would map the average thickness
to fsaverage coords, then load that into
Hi FS experts,
I was wondering whether it would be possible to measure the average
cortical thickness at a specific slice (either axial, coronal, or
sagittal). I read in Bruce's paper: Measuring the thickness of the human
cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images that Measuring the
thickness
Hi Panos
it would certainly be possible to make that measurement, but it wouldn't
tell you anything biologically interesting. Why would you want to do such a
thing? It will reflect the (arbitrary) image slice orientation and not the
brain.
cheers
Bruce
On Mon, 12 May 2014,
Hi Bruce,
Thank you for your reply. I was interested in looking how the thickness
changes from the posterior to the anterior side of the brain and vice
versa (the thickness gradient).
Thank you again for your time!
Panos
Hi Panos
it would certainly be possible to make that measurement, but
I usually can run one instance of FreeSurfer with 1GB if I use the -no-gut
flag
I have a benchmark of 4 recon-all running in a 4 Core AMD with 4GB RAM that
took only 10% more time than one recon-all alone.
2011/7/6 John Jan Drozd john.dr...@gmail.com
Hi Bruce,
Thanks for pointing this out to
Hi,
I am running freesurfer on 64 bit Fedora 10 linux.
I am using version: freesurfer-Linux-centos4_x86_64-stable-pub-v4.3.0.
Can anyone point me to a reference web page listing what steps I need to
type to process
a series of MRI dicom slices and use FreeSurfer to measure cortical
thickness for
http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FreeSurferBeginnersGuide
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 13:14, John Drozd john.dr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am running freesurfer on 64 bit Fedora 10 linux.
I am using version: freesurfer-Linux-centos4_x86_64-stable-pub-v4.3.0.
Can anyone point me to a
recon-all \
-i one slice in the anatomical dicom series \
-s subject id that you make up \
-sd directory to put the subject folder in \
-all
cheers
Bruce
On Tue, 5 Jul 2011, John Drozd wrote:
Hi,
I am running freesurfer on 64 bit Fedora 10 linux.
I am using
Hi Bruce and Pedro,
Thank you both for sending me your suggestions.
Just to let you know, because my .dcm (dicom) files had a space and two dots
in the filenames:
(e.g. 2008_12_08.ek -0035-0001-1.dcm )
(and using quotes around the file name or \ within the filename without
the quotes did not
sorry, but the majority of the time is required. We're working to speed
things up, but it is complicated software with multiple nonlinear warps,
segmentation procedures, etc
Bruce
On Tue, 5 Jul 2011, John Drozd wrote:
Hi Bruce and Pedro,
Thank you both for sending me your
Hi Bruce,
Okay, thank you. I understand and can see that to do an accurate job, the
pipeline must be complicated.
I have eight processors on my linux desktop computer.
Maybe some parts of recon-all are multi-threaded which could speed things up
for me :-)
Thank you,
John
2011/7/5 Bruce Fischl
Sorry, that won't help a single subject much, although there are options to run
the hemis in parallel. You can run multiple subjects at the same time, which is
what we usually do. Or you can use cuss
On Jul 5, 2011, at 5:11 PM, John Drozd john.dr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Bruce,
Okay, thank
Hi Bruce,
Thanks for the suggestion, Bruce. I'll run 8 different subjects at once.
Take care,
John
2011/7/5 Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Sorry, that won't help a single subject much, although there are options to
run the hemis in parallel. You can run multiple subjects at the same
how much ram do you have? You'll need at least 2G/subject if not 3
On Tue, 5
Jul 2011, John Drozd wrote:
Hi Bruce,
Thanks for the suggestion, Bruce. I'll run 8 different subjects at once.
Take care,
John
2011/7/5 Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Sorry, that won't help a single
Hi Bruce,
Thanks for pointing this out to me about the RAM.
I have 8 Gb of RAM. So I guess I can safely run 3 or 4 subjects simultaneously
if each subject requires 2 to 3 Gb of RAM.
Thanks,
John
Sent from my iPhone
On 2011-07-05, at 6:08 PM, Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
PM
To: Falk Lüsebrink
Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu; 'Nick Schmansky'
Subject: RE: [Freesurfer] Measuring cortical thickness with high resolution
data
Falk, it looks like that file was somehow converted to DOS. try:
dos2unix recon-all
chmod a+x recon-all
then re-run
doug
-Original Message-
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
[mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Nick Schmansky
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 3:28 PM
To: Falk Lüsebrink
Cc: Freesurfer Mailing List
Subject: RE: [Freesurfer] Measuring cortical thickness with high
: Freesurfer Mailing List
Subject: RE: [Freesurfer] Measuring cortical thickness with high resolution data
Falk,
There are no plans in the near future, but in the long term we'd like to remove
the dependence on conforming the data.
It just occurred to me that you could have the best of both worlds:
first
-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
[mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Nick Schmansky
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 3:28 PM
To: Falk Lüsebrink
Cc: Freesurfer Mailing List
Subject: RE: [Freesurfer] Measuring cortical thickness with high resolution data
Falk,
There are no plans
?
Regards,
Falk
-Original Message-
From: Nick Schmansky [mailto:ni...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 7:53 PM
To: Falk Lüsebrink
Cc: Freesurfer Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Measuring cortical thickness with high resolution data
Falk,
Attached is a modified
Falk,
Is it possible to send me an example hires volume that you are working
with? I'd like to send it through the stream myself so that I can fix
the problems encountered (with using hires data) first-hand. You can
upload the dicom or the 001.mgz file to me here:
30 matches
Mail list logo