Re: [Freesurfer] effect of demeaning the age

2014-08-05 Thread amirhossein manzouri
] effect of demeaning the age check out this web page http://mumford.fmripower.org/mean_centering/ On 08/04/2014 12:01 PM, amirhossein manzouri wrote: Hi, I am looking at group differences between patients(20) and controls(n=20). I get significant results when I use Age, while I get

Re: [Freesurfer] effect of demeaning the age

2014-08-05 Thread Douglas N Greve
of Douglas N Greve [gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] Sent: Tuesday, 5 August 2014 2:09 AM To: amirhossein manzouri; free surfer Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] effect of demeaning the age check out this web page http://mumford.fmripower.org/mean_centering/ On 08/04/2014 12:01 PM, amirhossein manzouri

Re: [Freesurfer] effect of demeaning the age

2014-08-05 Thread Sarah Whittle
...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] on behalf of Douglas N Greve [gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] Sent: Tuesday, 5 August 2014 2:09 AM To: amirhossein manzouri; free surfer Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] effect of demeaning the age check out this web page http://mumford.fmripower.org/mean_centering/ On 08/04/2014 12:01

[Freesurfer] effect of demeaning the age

2014-08-04 Thread amirhossein manzouri
Hi, I am looking at group differences between patients(20) and controls(n=20). I get significant results when I use Age, while I get no significance using Demeaned age both with DODS, also the pattern of significance is different. Would you please explain why? Best regards, Amirhossein Manzouri

Re: [Freesurfer] effect of demeaning the age

2014-08-04 Thread Douglas N Greve
check out this web page http://mumford.fmripower.org/mean_centering/ On 08/04/2014 12:01 PM, amirhossein manzouri wrote: Hi, I am looking at group differences between patients(20) and controls(n=20). I get significant results when I use Age, while I get no significance using Demeaned age