Re: [Freesurfer] mris_ca_label seed

2018-07-24 Thread Rosemary Nicholas
External Email - Use Caution Great, thank you! On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 12:28 PM, Bruce Fischl wrote: > no, they should be the same > > On Tue, 24 Jul 2018, Rosemary Nicholas wrote: > > >> External Email - Use Caution >> >> Hi Andrew, >> Thanks! >> >> So as long as we

Re: [Freesurfer] mris_ca_label seed

2018-07-24 Thread Bruce Fischl
no, they should be the same On Tue, 24 Jul 2018, Rosemary Nicholas wrote: External Email - Use Caution Hi Andrew,  Thanks!   So as long as we set the seed in mris_ca_label the results should be consistent, right?  Would there be any difference to running it this way

Re: [Freesurfer] mris_ca_label seed

2018-07-24 Thread Rosemary Nicholas
External Email - Use Caution Hi Andrew, Thanks! So as long as we set the seed in mris_ca_label the results should be consistent, right? Would there be any difference to running it this way (independently) and running it with recon-all? Thanks, Rosemary On Mon, Jul 23, 2018

Re: [Freesurfer] mris_ca_label seed

2018-07-23 Thread Hoopes, Andrew
Hi Rosemary, the seeds for those commands are set from recon-all. The individual binaries do not seed themselves with a default value, so it’s expected that mris_ca_label produces inconsistent results when run independently (and without the -seed flag). The algorithm processes the surface