Hi All,
Is it standard practice to conduct test when corrections are made in
freesurfer for subcortical structure volumes?
Also, are you able to analyse data acquired (1.5T - time point one) with
time-point two (3T) in the longitudinal pipeline?
Thanks
Theo
Hi Bruce,
That's fine, thanks very much.
Bronwyn Overs
Research Assistant
Neuroscience Research Australia
Margarete Ainsworth Building
Barker Street Randwick Sydney NSW 2031 Australia
M 0411 308 769 T +61 2 9399 1883
[ http://neura.edu.au/ | neura.edu.au ]
[
Hi Freesurfer Team,
Is there a way to visualise the sampling edges across a range of projfrac
values (0.1 (closer to WM) - 0.5) and overlay them onto PET data?
Any suggestions are greatly appreciated. Thanks.
Best Wishes,
Elijah
___
Freesurfer
Dear Freesurfer's experts,
Given the well known size of a voxel I would like to know the equivalent
surface area once projected on the white fsaverage cortical surface.
Could anyone give me a proper way of computing this ?
Best regards,
Matthieu
___
Hello
In a very similar situation to a post I found in the Freesurfer archive, I have
low-resolution (3T) and high-resolution scans (7T) of the same subject - and
would like to put the surfaces from the low-resolution scan into the space of
the hi-res data. The instructions from the previous
Hello Lisa,
Can you provide me with the contents of your
FREESURFER_HOME/build-stamp.txt file
On 06/12/2017 05:44 PM, Lisa Kramarenko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am getting the following error when my HCP pipelines come to the
> mris_make surfaces step:
>
> mris_make_surfaces: error while loading
Hi Doug,
After resampling the aparc annotation into the functional native space, the LUT
values no longer correspond to the correct regions. A screenshot is attached
here: http://i.imgur.com/HNIgrKI.png
The values for the labels range from 1 - 35 only.
The command is mri_label2vol --annot
Hi All,
Is it standard practice to conduct reliability when corrections are made in
freesurfer for subcortical structure volumes?
Also, are you able to analyse data acquired (1.5T - time point one) with
time-point two (3T) in the longitudinal pipeline?
Thanks
Theo
thanks Bronwyn
I got them. It will take a bit for us to get to as this is in the long
stream and we have a new postdoc who will be taking it over.
cheers
Bruce
On Tue, 13 Jun
2017, Bronwyn Overs wrote:
Hi Bruce,
Sure, files have been dropped again.
Kind regards,
Bronwyn Overs
Research
Great! Many thanks, Doug.
Best Wishes,
Elijah
On 13 June 2017 at 07:05:13, Douglas Greve (gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu) wrote:
You can try mri_concat seg1.nii.gz seg2.nii.gz --sum --o seg.nii.gz
This will work if there are no overlapping voxels. If there are, you'll have to
do something like
You can try mri_concat seg1.nii.gz seg2.nii.gz --sum --o seg.nii.gz
This will work if there are no overlapping voxels. If there are, you'll
have to do something like
mri_mask seg1.nii.gz seg2.nii.gz seg1-masked.nii.gz
then use the masked in the mri_concat command
On 6/11/17 11:18 AM,
can you send the log file?
On 6/11/17 10:08 PM, John Anderson wrote:
In the log file the error was:
ERROR: MultiRegistration::loadMovables: images have different voxel sizes.
Currently not supported, maybe first make conform?
Debug info: size(1) = 1, 1, 1 size(0) = 0.7, 0.7, 0.8
12 matches
Mail list logo