[Freesurfer] mri_vol2surf wrong hemisphere

2017-12-01 Thread Defenderfer, Matthew K
Hi,

I have a strange issue I can't figure out. I am currently trying to use the 
parcellation from Gordon et al. 2014 (download link 
here<http://www.nil.wustl.edu/labs/petersen/Resources.html>) to create ROIs for 
the frontoparietal network. They provided a volume of the parcellation in 
MNI152 space for public use. I took this volume and applied the mri_vol2surf 
command to it to create 2 overlays of the parcels, 1 for each hemisphere. The 
code was:

mri_vol2surf --mov Parcels_MNI_111.nii --trgsubject fsaverage --mni152reg --o 
lh.Parcels_fsaverage_111.mgh --hemi lh

mri_vol2surf --mov Parcels_MNI_111.nii --trgsubject fsaverage --mni152reg --o 
rh.Parcels_fsaverage_111.mgh --hemi rh

The code ran, but the LH parcels in the volume were transferred to the RH on 
the surface and vice versa. This is a problem since the parcellation is not 
symmetric across hemispheres.This is not a problem with the volume either as I 
looked at it overlayed with the MNI152 brain in fslview and saw that the 
parcels were on the correct hemisphere. Another problem is that 1 of the 
frontoparietal parcels, number 24, was not found on the surface of either 
hemisphere after turning it to a surface. I don't know why this would be the 
case since there are all cortical parcels.

I have also tried this with a volume ROI that is only located on the left 
hemisphere. After running essentially the same vol2surf command as above, the 
ROI only appeared on the RH surface. I am using mri_vol2surf from Freesurfer 
v6.0.0


Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!

Best,
Matthew Defenderfer



Matthew K. Defenderfer B.S. | Graduate Research Assistant

Graduate Biomedical Sciences | Neuroscience

UAB | The University of Alabama at Birmingham

Laboratory of Kristina Visscher, PhD

Department of Neurobiology

CIRC 111 | C: (865) 805-6389

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


[Freesurfer] mri_vol2surf wrong hemisphere

2017-12-01 Thread Defenderfer, Matthew K
Hi,

I have a strange issue I can't figure out. I am currently trying to use the 
parcellation from Gordon et al. 2014 
(http://www.nil.wustl.edu/labs/petersen/Resources.html) to create ROIs for the 
frontoparietal network. They provided a volume of the parcellation in MNI152 
space for public use. I took this volume and applied the mri_vol2surf command 
to it to create 2 overlays of the parcels, 1 for each hemisphere. The code was:

mri_vol2surf --mov Parcels_MNI_111.nii --trgsubject fsaverage --mni152reg --o 
lh.Parcels_fsaverage_111.mgh --hemi lh

mri_vol2surf --mov Parcels_MNI_111.nii --trgsubject fsaverage --mni152reg --o 
rh.Parcels_fsaverage_111.mgh --hemi rh

The code ran, but the LH parcels in the volume were transferred to the RH on 
the surface and vice versa. This is a problem since the parcellation is not 
symmetric across hemispheres.This is not a problem with the volume either as I 
looked at it overlayed with the MNI152 brain in fslview and saw that the 
parcels were on the correct hemisphere. Another problem is that 1 of the 
frontoparietal parcels, number 24, was not found on the surface of either 
hemisphere after turning it to a surface. I don't know why this would be the 
case since there are all cortical parcels.

I have also tried this with a volume ROI that is only located on the left 
hemisphere. After running essentially the same vol2surf command as above, the 
ROI only appeared on the RH surface. I am using mri_vol2surf from Freesurfer 
v6.0.0


Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!

Best,
Matthew Defenderfer


Matthew K. Defenderfer B.S. | Graduate Research Assistant

Graduate Biomedical Sciences | Neuroscience

UAB | The University of Alabama at Birmingham

Laboratory of Kristina Visscher, PhD

Department of Neurobiology

CIRC 111 | C: (865) 805-6389

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


[Freesurfer] mri_surf2surf on edited subjects

2017-12-13 Thread Defenderfer, Matthew K
Hi all,


I am trying to transfer a surface file from fsaverage_sym space to a recently 
edited individual subject's hemisphere. I previously ran recon-all on the 
subject and then edited the wm, brainmask, etc. to fix some defects I had 
found. Before the edits, I could transfer the surface and load it on the 
subject's hemisphere as an overlay perfectly fine. After editing and rerunning 
the subject through recon-all and the xhemi pipeline, I tried to transfer and 
load the overlay again using the following command, same as originally:


mri_surf2surf --srcsubject fsaverage_sym --srcsurfreg sphere.reg --trgsubject 
subj001 --trgsurfreg fsaverage_sym.sphere.reg --hemi lh --sval template.sym.mgh 
--tval subj001/surf/template.sym.mgh


The command completes, but the resulting overlay does not have the same number 
of vertices as the surface. It does however, have the same number of vertices 
as the original surface from before rerunning the recon-all command. So it 
seems like it's still transferring the overlay to original surface. My 
SUBJECTS_DIR does not have the subjects' original recon-all data in it either, 
just the data from the edited recon-all. Any help on this would be appreciated. 
Thank you!


-Matt Defenderfer


Matthew K. Defenderfer B.S. | Graduate Research Assistant

Graduate Biomedical Sciences | Neuroscience

UAB | The University of Alabama at Birmingham

Laboratory of Kristina Visscher, PhD

Department of Neurobiology

CIRC 111 | C: (865) 805-6389

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] mri_surf2surf on edited subjects

2017-12-13 Thread Defenderfer, Matthew K
The number of vertices match between the lh.sphere.reg and lh.pial. All of the 
timestamps are the same as well. I just tried this with v5.3 as well and the 
problem is the same. Thank you for helping with this!


-Matt Defenderfer


Matthew K. Defenderfer B.S. | Graduate Research Assistant

Graduate Biomedical Sciences | Neuroscience

UAB | The University of Alabama at Birmingham

Laboratory of Kristina Visscher, PhD

Department of Neurobiology

CIRC 111 | C: (865) 805-6389



From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
<freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> on behalf of Bruce Fischl 
<fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2017 4:16:03 PM
To: Freesurfer support list
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] mri_surf2surf on edited subjects

Hi Matt

can you run mris_euler_number on that subject's lh.sphere.reg and see if it
has the same number of vertices as the lh.pial for example? Or check
timestamps. If it was not recreated after your editing you will need to
rerun part of recon-all

cheers
Bruce


On
Wed, 13 Dec 2017, Defenderfer, Matthew K wrote:

>
> Hi all,
>
>
> I am trying to transfer a surface file from fsaverage_sym space to a recently 
> edited individual
> subject's hemisphere. I previously ran recon-all on the subject and then 
> edited the wm, brainmask, etc.
> to fix some defects I had found. Before the edits, I could transfer the 
> surface and load it on the
> subject's hemisphere as an overlay perfectly fine. After editing and 
> rerunning the subject through
> recon-all and the xhemi pipeline, I tried to transfer and load the overlay 
> again using the following
> command, same as originally:
>
>
> mri_surf2surf --srcsubject fsaverage_sym --srcsurfreg sphere.reg --trgsubject 
> subj001 --trgsurfreg
> fsaverage_sym.sphere.reg --hemi lh --sval template.sym.mgh --tval 
> subj001/surf/template.sym.mgh
>
>
> The command completes, but the resulting overlay does not have the same 
> number of vertices as the
> surface. It does however, have the same number of vertices as the original 
> surface from before
> rerunning the recon-all command. So it seems like it's still transferring the 
> overlay to original
> surface. My SUBJECTS_DIR does not have the subjects' original recon-all data 
> in it either, just the
> data from the edited recon-all. Any help on this would be appreciated. Thank 
> you!
>
>
> -Matt Defenderfer
>
>
> Matthew K. Defenderfer B.S. | Graduate Research Assistant
>
> Graduate Biomedical Sciences | Neuroscience
>
> UAB | The University of Alabama at Birmingham
>
> Laboratory of Kristina Visscher, PhD
>
> Department of Neurobiology
>
> CIRC 111 | C: (865) 805-6389
>
>
>
>
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] mri_vol2surf wrong hemisphere

2017-12-07 Thread Defenderfer, Matthew K
Hi Doug,


FSLView gives a label of L and R and the parcels on the LH in fslview match the 
LH parcels in their included Excel spreadsheet. That's really all the 
verification I have for it right now. It's possible they switched the 
hemispheres when they made the original parcellation volume before making the 
excel sheet, but I don't know how likely that is. Is there anything I can do to 
help out with this?


-Matt


Matthew K. Defenderfer B.S. | Graduate Research Assistant

Graduate Biomedical Sciences | Neuroscience

UAB | The University of Alabama at Birmingham

Laboratory of Kristina Visscher, PhD

Department of Neurobiology

CIRC 111 | C: (865) 805-6389



From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
<freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> on behalf of Douglas N Greve 
<gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Sent: Monday, December 4, 2017 11:46:27 AM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] mri_vol2surf wrong hemisphere

How do you know what is right and left in the volume?


On 12/01/2017 01:59 PM, Defenderfer, Matthew K wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a strange issue I can't figure out. I am currently trying to
> use the parcellation from Gordon et al. 2014
> (http://www.nil.wustl.edu/labs/petersen/Resources.html) to create ROIs
> for the frontoparietal network. They provided a volume of the
> parcellation in MNI152 space for public use. I took this volume and
> applied the mri_vol2surf command to it to create 2 overlays of the
> parcels, 1 for each hemisphere. The code was:
>
> mri_vol2surf --mov Parcels_MNI_111.nii --trgsubject fsaverage
> --mni152reg --o lh.Parcels_fsaverage_111.mgh --hemi lh
>
> mri_vol2surf --mov Parcels_MNI_111.nii --trgsubject fsaverage
> --mni152reg --o rh.Parcels_fsaverage_111.mgh --hemi rh
>
> The code ran, but the LH parcels in the volume were transferred to the
> RH on the surface and vice versa. This is a problem since the
> parcellation is not symmetric across hemispheres.This is not a problem
> with the volume either as I looked at it overlayed with the MNI152
> brain in fslview and saw that the parcels were on the correct
> hemisphere. Another problem is that 1 of the frontoparietal parcels,
> number 24, was not found on the surface of either hemisphere after
> turning it to a surface. I don't know why this would be the case since
> there are all cortical parcels.
>
> I have also tried this with a volume ROI that is only located on the
> left hemisphere. After running essentially the same vol2surf command
> as above, the ROI only appeared on the RH surface. I am using
> mri_vol2surf from Freesurfer v6.0.0
>
>
> Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!
>
> Best,
> Matthew Defenderfer
>
>
> *Matthew K. Defenderfer B.S. | Graduate Research Assistant*
>
> Graduate Biomedical Sciences|Neuroscience
>
> UAB | The University of Alabama at Birmingham
>
> Laboratory of Kristina Visscher, PhD
>
> Department of Neurobiology
>
> CIRC 111 | C: (865) 805-6389
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

--
Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
MGH-NMR Center
gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Phone Number: 617-724-2358
Fax: 617-726-7422

Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2
www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html<http://www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html>
Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


[Freesurfer] T2 white matter surface refinement

2019-11-07 Thread Defenderfer, Matthew K
External Email - Use Caution

Hi,

Looking through the documentation, there are extra options to include a T2 
image to refine the pial surface boundary, but I was wondering if FreeSurfer 
can use a T2 in conjunction with a T1 to help refine the white matter/gray 
matter boundary? As in, gray matter with higher myelin content than average 
could cause the white matter boundary to be placed further out than normal when 
just using a T1; can FreeSurfer currently use a T2 image to help prevent that 
at all? Thank you

-Matt


Matthew K. Defenderfer B.S. | Graduate Research Assistant

Graduate Biomedical Sciences | Neuroscience

UAB | The University of Alabama at Birmingham

Laboratory of Kristina Visscher, PhD

Department of Neurobiology

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer