Re: [Freesurfer] Orthographic camera in FreeView

2022-04-25 Thread Anderson M. Winkler
agLwMtb3A/https%3A%2F%2Fsurfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu%2Ffswiki%2FUpdateFreeview > > Best, > Ruopeng > > On Apr 15, 2022, at 10:23 AM, Anderson M. Winkler > wrote: > > External Email - Use Caution > > Hi all, > > Is there a way to configure the camera in the 3D viewpor

[Freesurfer] Orthographic camera in FreeView

2022-04-15 Thread Anderson M. Winkler
External Email - Use Caution Hi all, Is there a way to configure the camera in the 3D viewport in FreeView to use an orthographic projection instead of perspective (which currently is the default)? Orthographic used to be the default in tksurfer. A nice feature about it is that

[Freesurfer] Sources Sought: Octave/MATLAB programmer {Disarmed}

2020-11-30 Thread Anderson M. Winkler
External Email - Use Caution Dear all, The NIMH/NIH is looking for a skilled Octave/MATLAB programmer, with knowledge of multivariate statistics, to implement inference for canonical correlation analysis (CCA) using permutations, as described in the recent paper

Re: [Freesurfer] Running FSL randomise on FS cortical thickness data {Disarmed}

2019-07-31 Thread Anderson M. Winkler
External Email - Use Caution Hi, It's possible to analyse longitudinal designs with PALM. Some mild assumptions must hold, and those assumptions are different than those of an LME model. PALM doesn't assume normality, doesn't require a specified form for the dependence structure,

[Freesurfer] Postdoctoral position at the NIH/NIMH

2018-04-17 Thread Anderson M. Winkler
We are seeking enthusiastic applicants for a Post-Doctoral Fellowship position to help with the collection and analysis of large brain-imaging datasets. The successful candidate will use state-of-the-art artificial intelligence methods, with the aim of better understanding psychiatric disorders in

Re: [Freesurfer] Error viewing corrected results

2017-03-08 Thread Anderson M. Winkler
Hi all, That's exactly as Antonin says -- I have very little to add :-) Only a few suggestions: - With surfaces, both cluster and TFCE statistics tend to be slow. Consider using the tail approximation ("-approx tail -n 500 -nouncorrected") - Include -logp, so that the p-values are in log-10

Re: [Freesurfer] Multiple comparison question

2017-02-02 Thread Anderson M. Winkler
e are several other measures such as volume, > thickness, FA, can I then put them in a single csv file and run the > command or I have to create 3 csv files, one each for volume, thickness,and > FA and also invoke -corrmod? > > Thanks > > Regards > VM > > On Feb 2, 2017 1:01

Re: [Freesurfer] Multiple comparison question

2017-02-02 Thread Anderson M. Winkler
Hi VM, Please see below: On 1 February 2017 at 02:38, neuroimage analyst < neuroimage.anal...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > We extracted volume measures from 7 ROIs in 2 groups and compared > a) Mean of each ROI volume between group, and compared independently such > as > i) whether mean of ROI

Re: [Freesurfer] Display FSL PALM(permutation) stats in freeview

2016-09-20 Thread Anderson M. Winkler
Hi Ajay, Make sure you have to run palm_hemisplit on the outputs first, i.e.: palm_hemisplit bh.thickness_* Note that the "-o bh.thickness" was a somewhat poor choice of outputs as now it's necessary to use the underscore ("_") to avoid overwriting original inputs; for future runs, consider

Re: [Freesurfer] Display FSL PALM(permutation) stats in freeview

2016-09-19 Thread Anderson M. Winkler
Hi Ajay, The mask is a file of the "curvature" type, that is, it contains vertexwise data, and should mask out the "unknown" region (that region in the medial aspect that is not cortex and is there to ensure the topology is the same as that of a sphere). The mask can alternatively be a .mgz file

Re: [Freesurfer] area and smoothing

2016-09-17 Thread Anderson M. Winkler
Hi Seung-Gul, Please see below: On 16 September 2016 at 00:52, Seung Gul Kang wrote: > Dear Freesurfer experts, > > 1. I want to compare the area and/or areapial between two groups in qdec > menu. > I think that the eTIV or total surface area should be used as a

Re: [Freesurfer] Display FSL PALM(permutation) stats in freeview

2016-09-16 Thread Anderson M. Winkler
Hi Ajay, To open the .mgz files produced by PALM you would first load the surface in FreeView (at the top of the left panel, click on "Surface" then on the button with a "+" sign), then after the surface has been loaded, in the menu "Overlay" in the left panel, select "Load generic..." and load

Re: [Freesurfer] design matrix palm

2016-09-08 Thread Anderson M. Winkler
Hi Maaike, I know palm! :) Please see below: On 7 September 2016 at 09:34, maaike rive wrote: > Hi all, > > I was adviced to use PALM for permutation of non-orthogonal surface data. > However, I have some questions regarding the design matrix en contrast > files to be

Re: [Freesurfer] Cluster Forming Threshold

2016-09-07 Thread Anderson M. Winkler
Hi Tim, There is no established criterion and a recent, useful guideline is perhaps use the threshold that would correspond to a p=0.001, that is, about 3.1 in a z-map (see Woo et al., Neuroimage, 2014 ). All the best, Anderson On 1

Re: [Freesurfer] 3 fixed factors and matrix design

2016-09-01 Thread Anderson M. Winkler
Hi Shady, Try assembling the design as this: EV1: Group 1 (coded as 0/1) EV2: Group 2 (coded as 0/1) EV3: Group 3 (coded as 0/1) EV4: Sex (coded as +1/-1) EV5: Site (coded as +1/-1) The contrasts to compare the three groups are then: C1: [1 -1 0 0 0] C2: [1 0 -1 0 0] C3: [0 1 -1 0 0] C4: [-1 1

Re: [Freesurfer] mri_glmfit-sim permutation testing running after 3 days!

2016-08-30 Thread Anderson M. Winkler
Hi all, In the presence of nuisance (orthogonal or not) the permutation test is only approximate, whatever is the method used. Regressing out the nuisance introduces dependencies between the residuals that render them strictly not exchangeable. However, in practice this is not an issue, and the

Re: [Freesurfer] volume, surface area, and thickness

2016-08-30 Thread Anderson M. Winkler
Hi Woo-Suk Just adding to Bruce's reply: area isn't a "technically more noisy and usually thus less sensitive" as the reviewer suggests. Area isn't noisier on its own right, and it's measured from the very same surfaces from which thickness is measured. However, there is a much larger variability

Re: [Freesurfer] Multiple comparisons to confirm atrophy

2015-11-26 Thread Anderson M. Winkler
Hi Clare, This is something that PALM can do. It seems we're in the same Dept. Please send me an email off-list and we can try to have this sorted out. All the best, Anderson On 19 November 2015 at 08:37, Clare Loane

Re: [Freesurfer] regional surface area differences

2015-02-28 Thread Anderson M. Winkler
) 3) Which --surfreg file should I use? sphere.reg vs sphere. Or do I not need the --surfreg? Thanks, Abid -- Forwarded message -- From: Anderson M. Winkler wink...@fmrib.ox.ac.uk Date: Tue, May 14, 2013 at 1:19 AM Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Usage of --area option

Re: [Freesurfer] cortical surface area measurement and vertex-wise analysis

2014-10-14 Thread Anderson M. Winkler
this helps! All the best, Anderson On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Anderson M. Winkler wink...@fmrib.ox.ac.uk wrote: Hi Donna, In that same paper we also comment on the differences between expansion/contraction and absolute areal measurements assessed at each face of the surface (i.e

Re: [Freesurfer] cortical surface area measurement and vertex-wise analysis

2014-10-12 Thread Anderson M. Winkler
Hi Emma, Could you clarify what would be the disadvantages that you've heard about? I ask because we've studied and tried to clarify many aspects of the analysis of surface area in this paper http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811912002996. Maybe if there's something not

Re: [Freesurfer] cortical surface area measurement and vertex-wise analysis

2014-10-12 Thread Anderson M. Winkler
Hi Donna, In that same paper we also comment on the differences between expansion/contraction and absolute areal measurements assessed at each face of the surface (i.e., facewise), which can, after interpolation, be converted to vertexwise to facilitate analysis using current tools (e.g.,

Re: [Freesurfer] problems with cortical surface area maps

2014-06-01 Thread Anderson M. Winkler
Hi Lars, I guess you are working with vertexwise rather than facewise data, is this right? You'd need to compute then the area-per-vertex of the same sphere used as the target for the interpolation, i.e., the ico7 (surf/?h.sphere.reg in fsaverage I think). Attached is a Matlab function that

Re: [Freesurfer] problems with cortical surface area maps

2014-05-31 Thread Anderson M. Winkler
Hi Lars, This pattern is because the faces in a geodesic sphere don't have all identical sizes, even if the original icosahedron was perfectly regular, i.e., a Platonic polyhedron. We describe this phenomenon here http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.026, and give a simple formula that

[Freesurfer] Download FS not working?

2014-01-09 Thread Anderson M. Winkler
Hi guys, I've been trying in the last days to download FS but it doesn't seem to work: winkler@volans:~ $ wget ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pub/dist/freesurfer/5.3.0/freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-stable-pub-v5.3.0.tar.gz --2014-01-09 20:47:12--

Re: [Freesurfer] problem with surface area regression

2013-06-25 Thread Anderson M. Winkler
Hi Wen, Brain volume has a good relationship with the overall surface area measured in native space (so, irrespective to any kind of interpolation). We found an R^2 of 0.856, which is higher even than the correlation of brain volume with gray matter volume as measured via VBM-like methods.

Re: [Freesurfer] Usage of --area option in estimating the vertex-wise maps of surface area

2013-05-13 Thread Anderson M. Winkler
Hi Xi-Nian, As Doug said, they don't do the same thing. The method in the paper uses a different kind of interpolation to allows the preservation of the amount of area, whereas mris_preproc achieves the same globally using a Jacobian correction. The results aren't expected to be identical at the

Re: [Freesurfer] mean thickness covariate, mean area covariate, mri_anatomical_stats for multiple subjects

2013-03-09 Thread Anderson M. Winkler
Hi Laura, 1. Is there a paper that I could cite that recommends using mean cortical thickness rather than ICV? If it helps, we used cortical thickness and area as covariate for the respective analysis of regional thickness and area. Brain volume, which is more closely related to ICV,

Re: [Freesurfer] mean thickness covariate, mean area covariate, mri_anatomical_stats for multiple subjects

2013-03-09 Thread Anderson M. Winkler
surface area is more sensitive to atrophy but I don't know if that is born out in the data... Laura. On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Anderson M. Winkler wink...@fmrib.ox.ac.uk wrote: Hi Laura, 1. Is there a paper that I could cite that recommends using mean cortical thickness

Re: [Freesurfer] download freesurfer

2013-02-18 Thread Anderson M. Winkler
Hi Merlin, Have you tried wget -c to resume an interrupted download? You can put the command inside an infinite loop that will keep retrying even if the connection is interrupted when you are not watching (say, overnight). The following should work: while (true) ; do wget -c -T 60

Re: [Freesurfer] Surface area computation

2013-02-16 Thread Anderson M. Winkler
Dear Shantanu, An implementation that runs in Matlab or Octave is available here: http://brainder.org/download/areal I was planning to write a compiled version that could be integrated more easily in FS. However, just by the time as the paper was published, I moved to another country and started

Re: [Freesurfer] Antw: Re: thickness and area in aparc.stats and mri_glmfit

2013-02-11 Thread Anderson M. Winkler
Anderson M. Winkler wink...@fmrib.ox.ac.uk 11.02.2013 14:22 Dear Wolff, There is nothing wrong with your results. Your finding is one more confirmation that thickness and area are indeed different traits, which are influenced differently by different genetic and/or environmental factors

Re: [Freesurfer] Freesurfer vertex wise area reference

2013-01-17 Thread Anderson M. Winkler
Dear Mahinda, For the mris_preproc, I think Doug posted already explaining how it works - it uses a jacobian correction in a way that makes it mass-conservative. You may want to search the archives. For the ROIs, the standard method is to add up the areas of their constituent vertices, so it

Re: [Freesurfer] winkler surf data with qdec ?

2012-12-07 Thread Anderson M. Winkler
Hi Greg, It's ok to smooth using FS tools, as long as the different sizes of the faces of the ico7 are taken into account. This means that, after running rpncalc, the smoothdpx command can be skipped, and the data can be converted to vertexwise and imported into qdec, which will then smooth it