Do you want to contribute to top quality medical research? We are looking for a
postdoctoral fellow for studies of brain degeneration in Lewy Body dementia
(DLB) using advanced brain imaging methods.
ki.varbi.com
All the best
Dani
--
Daniel Ferreira, PhD, Docent (Associate Professor)
Director of Center f
nput data to make sure that
> something is not really wrong. Eg, a large artifact or unusual anatomy.
>
> On 1/17/19 5:35 AM, Daniel Ferreira wrote:
> >
> > External Email - Use Caution
> >
> > Thanks Greve. Yes, I mean that the moveable is completely
f view
>
> On 1/16/19 11:30 AM, Daniel Ferreira wrote:
> >
> > External Email - Use Caution
> >
> > Hi Greve,
> >
> > Thanks for your quick reply.
> >
> > I mean that tkregister2 loads the target volume (I think the original
>
at do you mean that the tal volume does not load as a mov volume? Can
> you send the terminal output from tkregister2?
>
> On 1/16/19 10:01 AM, Daniel Ferreira wrote:
>
> External Email - Use Caution
>
> Dear Bruce, Martin, and experts,
>
>
> I posted an issue a
?
Thank you very much in advance
Dani
Daniel Ferreira
<https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu=from:%22Daniel+Ferreira%22>
Wed, 09 Jan 2019 10:22:05 -0800
<https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu=date:20190109>
Ex
s wondering if you would know about any way to fix this?
Thank you in advance,
Dani
--
*Daniel Ferreira, PhD, Assistant Professor*
Division of Clinical Geriatrics; Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences
and Society
Karolinska Institutet (Sweden)
*Address: **Blickagången 16, 141 52 Hudding
nd back again produces interpolation artefacts that are
> significant and at orders comparable with 1 year of neurodegenerative
> disease.
>
> Best, Martin
>
>
>
>
>
> On 30. Aug 2018, at 18:22, Daniel Ferreira wrote:
>
>
>
> Dear colleagues,
>
> I was
be performed by any way) that minimizes these
differences in somehow.
Thank you very much
Dani
--
*Daniel Ferreira, PhD, Assistant Professor*
Division of Clinical Geriatrics; Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences
and Society
Karolinska Institutet (Sweden)
*Address: **Blickagången 16, 141 52
any opinion on
which sequence to use?
Thank you very much,
Best regards
Dani
--
Daniel Ferreira, PhD.
Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Clinical
Geriatrics (Karolinska Institute, Sweden)
danif...@gmail.com | daniel.ferreira.padi...@ki.se
2016-09-28 10:15 GMT
have
always produced nice results with the MPRAGE sequence and the MPRAGE flag
seems to work well. Do you think this flag will work as well on MP2RAGE? Of
course it is difficult to say but we wonder if you have any opinion on
which sequence to use?
Thank you very much,
Best regards
--
Daniel
Dear experts,
Can I do -qcache with FS 5.3.0 or FS 5.1.0 on images that have been
recon-all -all with FS 5.0.0?
Thanks
Dani
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The
Dear experts,
Can I do -qcache with FS 5.3.0 or FS 5.1.0 on images that have been
recon-all -all with FS 5.0.0?
Thanks
Dani
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The
Dear experts,
Could you please help me with my previous comment (see below)?
Thanks so much
Daniel Ferreira
Dear experts,
We are processing a dataset that gives us this error quite often:
ERROR! FOV=300.000 256
Include the flag -cw256 with recon-all!
Inspect orig.mgz to ensure the head
Dear experts,
We are processing a dataset that gives us this error quite often:
ERROR! FOV=300.000 256
Include the flag -cw256 with recon-all!
Inspect orig.mgz to ensure the head is fully visible.
Is it ok if I use -cw256 by default to all my scans even for those with
FOV=256 that do not need
it to the -base
and -long runs, just to be safe.
best, Martin
On 01/29/2014 09:08 AM, Daniel Ferreira wrote:
Dear experts,
I have two questions regarding the longitudinal stream:
- I am including Baseline and 12 months follow-up in my study. However, I
also have 6 months follow-up. I wonder
registration.
- I am applying the -mprage flag in the crossectional first step. Should I
use it in the -base and -longs steps too?
Thanks very much
Daniel Ferreira
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
be affected by
this issues.
Thanks a lot.
Daniel Ferreira
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom
in
the same email. I go through way too many emails to keep track of who's
doing what. thanks!
doug
On 10/23/13 4:13 AM, Daniel Ferreira wrote:
Dear Douglas,
Please, find attached aseg.stats files for subj1 and subj2.
Thanks
Daniel
Message: 4
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 11:39:11 -0400
From
Dear Douglas,
Please, find attached aseg.stats files for subj1 and subj2.
Thanks
Daniel
aseg.stats_subj2
Description: Binary data
aseg.stats_suj1
Description: Binary data
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Dear Douglas,
I generated my table with version 5.3.
Attached is an example for two subjects (in .txt and .xls formats).
Best regards
Dani
Measure:volume Left-Lateral-Ventricle Left-Inf-Lat-Vent
Left-Cerebellum-White-MatterLeft-Cerebellum-Cortex Left-Thalamus-Proper
Dear Douglas and Martin,
Thanks for your replies.
So far I have always been able to get eTIV when running asegstats2table
(last column on the spreadsheet). But my current FreeSurfer version (5.3.0)
is not grabbing it.
I can found eTIV in the header and extract it for all the subjects with
a lot
Dani
Message: 7
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 10:32:51 -0300
From: Marcos Martins da Silva marc...@hucff.ufrj.br
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] missing eTIV in asegstats2table
To: Daniel Ferreira dani...@ull.es
Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Message-ID: 1380720771.1845.9.camel@alien
Content-Type: text
, eg the line now looks like
# Measure EstimatedTotalIntraCranialVol, eTIV, Estimated Total
Intracranial Volume, 1509814.835086, mm^3
On 10/01/2013 10:50 AM, Daniel Ferreira wrote:
Hi,
I just run my first asegstats2table in version 5.3 of FS. Is not eTIV
included in the generated file anymore
Hi,
I just run my first asegstats2table in version 5.3 of FS. Is not eTIV
included in the generated file anymore?
I know that I can get eTIV with mri_segstats --subject subjid --etiv-only but,
is it any way to get the values for all my subjects in a text file as
asegstas2table does?
Thanks a
with the -m thickness
option. This gives you a measure of mean thickness for the hemisphere as
well.
do8ug
2012/10/30 Daniel Ferreira dani...@ull.es
Please, is there any automatic way to extract this Mean Thickness values
for lh and rh for a big group of subjects? As for example aparcstats2table
. Nothing will work on this
sorry
Bruce
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012, Daniel Ferreira wrote:
Hi Nick,
Here comes attached the tkmedit orig.mgz
thanks
Daniel
2012/10/22 Nick Schmansky ni...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
what does orig.mgz look like in tkmedit?
n.
On Thu, 2012
sampling it into the
volume (or just using the aparc+aseg.mgz that is distributed with fsaverage)
cheers
Bruce
On Wed, 17 Oct 2012, Daniel Ferreira wrote:
Hello again,
Thanks for all the information Bruce.
Is it not possible to back-project the regions defined in the 2D
surface-based
Hi,
I was wondering what should I use as an average of cortical thickness for
the whole cortex.
The aparc.stats output gives a value of Mean Thickness for each
hemisphere. But this value does not coincide with the one I get if I
average the 34 variables from aparc.stats. Do you know why?
thanks
Well, in the PACs looks fine. When converting to nii it is already wrapped.
I will go to the machine again and see.
Thanks!
2012/10/30 Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
really? In what viewer? Does it happen in the rawavg.mgz?
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012, Daniel Ferreira wrote:
Hi,
I
over the cortex.
cheers
Bruce
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012, Daniel Ferreira wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering what should I use as an average of cortical thickness for
the whole cortex.
The aparc.stats output gives a value of Mean Thickness for each
hemisphere. But this value does not coincide
Please, is there any automatic way to extract this Mean Thickness values
for lh and rh for a big group of subjects? As for example aparcstats2table?
thank you very much
Daniel
2012/10/30 Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
yes, I think so
Bruce
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012, Daniel Ferreira
Hi,
I did recon-all -i dicoms -s id
and then what Nick posted.
2012/10/18 Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Hi Daniel
what was your original data format? Did you start with dicoms?
Bruce
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012, Daniel Ferreira wrote:
Thanks Nick very much for your suggestion
volume(s) and transformed (inflated) to
the 2D spherical surface?
Daniel
-- Forwarded message --
From: Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Date: 2012/10/11
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] cortical parcellation question
To: Daniel Ferreira danif...@gmail.com
Cc: freesurfer
. are the neuroanatomical boundaries the same; does
the left inferior temporal cortex in the Freesurfer cortical parcellation =
the left inferior temporal cortex in the Harvard-Oxford atlas downloaded
with FSL)
Many thanks
Daniel Ferreira
___
Freesurfer
. in the
same format as the Harvard-Oxford atlas that is downloaded with FSL).
Thanks a lot.
Daniel Ferreira
2012/10/3 Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Hi Daniel,
1. Do you mean the atlas or the parcellation of your subjects? We cannot
distribute the individual subjects in the atlas
will have a big effect on dura (darkening it), but will also reduce
gray/white contrast.
cheers
Bruce
On Fri, 17 Aug 2012, Daniel Ferreira wrote:
Dear all,
We are designing a study based on clinical data. We want to work with a
MPRAGE sequence but subjects have been given 4 different sets
: 9
- TR: 1900; TE: 3,39; TI: 900; flip angle: 15
I wonder how these differences could affect the images and thus the
results. Can I combine all of them or at least some of them? Are they so
different that I should just study them by separate?
thank you very much on advance
Daniel Ferreira
results are justified or at least
permitted instead of FWE? Any paper or information about this specific FWE
disadvantages in aid of p0,001 uncorrected results?
Thank you very much in advance
Daniel Ferreira
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer
Hello Khoa,
Thank you very much for your suggestion. I checked both brainmask.mgz and
wm.mgz and it saw ok for me. I have already sent my two scans to Bruce. Hope
something can be done.
Cheers!
Daniel Ferreira
2011/9/13 Khoa Nguyen k...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Hi Daniel
your scans to Bruce?
Thanks,
Fatima
From: mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu [mailto:
mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu]On Behalf Of Daniel Ferreira Padilla
Sent: 14 September 2011 09:19
Dear Bruce and experts,
I would really appreciate if you can help me with my scans.
I have successfully processed all my sample but got this same FindFacePath
error with 2 subjects.
I checked the brainmask and wm files and for me they look ok. So I do not
know how can I fix this
have the permissions, prefix your ln command with a
sudo and it'll ask for your password, and that should work successfully.
If you don't have permissions, you need to ask your system administrator to
do so.
-Krish
On Jun 20, 2011, at 5:44 AM, Daniel Ferreira Padilla wrote:
Dear all,
I'm
permission?
Thank you very much for your help.
Daniel Ferreira
#
#@# Cortical ribbon mask Sat Jun 18 17:57:36 WEST 2011
/home/neuroimagen/DANI/subjects/uu0148_36_1/mri
mris_volmask --label_left_white 2 --label_left_ribbon 3 --label_right_white
41
separately? Can I do it at the same
time? And if I could, what command do I have to use?
I hope these are not too much questions.
Thank you very much in advance.
Daniel Ferreira
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https
...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu]
Enviado el: miércoles, 10 de febrero de 2010 15:49
Para: Daniel Ferreira Padilla
CC: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Asunto: Re: [Freesurfer] tksurfer error
have you tried clicking the redraw button?
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, Daniel
Ferreira Padilla wrote:
Dear Freesurfer users,
I
45 matches
Mail list logo