Re: [Freesurfer] Freesurfer 1mm Isotropic standard and the Future

2012-10-16 Thread Joshua Lee
Hi Everyone, Back in May I was very excited to learn that there was some movement toward allowing Freesurfer to utilize the higher than 1mm iso. resolutions of some of our structural images, which could be fantastic help in subcortical segmentations. Is this something that is still in the works

Re: [Freesurfer] Freesurfer 1mm Isotropic standard and the Future

2012-05-16 Thread Michael Waskom
Oops i just realized I only sent this to Bruce: Thanks! It looks like this involves some manual intervention. Matt., I assume you're not manually making control points on 1000s of subjects (I imagine this is for the human connectcome project). Is your code public somewhere? Cheers, Michael

Re: [Freesurfer] Freesurfer 1mm Isotropic standard and the Future

2012-05-16 Thread Bruce Fischl
Only because I was lazy! You can use surfaces for normalization too. I think the script I gave Matt probably had that in it On May 16, 2012, at 9:21 PM, Michael Waskom mwas...@stanford.edu wrote: Oops i just realized I only sent this to Bruce: Thanks! It looks like this involves some

Re: [Freesurfer] Freesurfer 1mm Isotropic standard and the Future

2012-05-15 Thread Bruce Fischl
you need to call mris_make_surfaces directly. It's a bit complicated as you need to intensity normalize and register the hires volume to the surfaces first. I have an example script if anyone is interested, but no one has used it yet but me I don't think (unless Matt Glasser has gotten his

Re: [Freesurfer] Freesurfer 1mm Isotropic standard and the Future

2012-05-15 Thread Matt Glasser
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Freesurfer 1mm Isotropic standard and the Future you need to call mris_make_surfaces directly. It's a bit complicated as you need to intensity normalize and register the hires volume to the surfaces first. I have an example script if anyone is interested, but no one has

Re: [Freesurfer] Freesurfer 1mm Isotropic standard and the Future

2012-05-15 Thread Joshua Lee
: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 7:29 AM To: Michael Waskom Cc: FreeSurfer Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Freesurfer 1mm Isotropic standard and the Future you need to call mris_make_surfaces directly. It's a bit complicated as you need to intensity normalize and register the hires volume to the surfaces first

[Freesurfer] Freesurfer 1mm Isotropic standard and the Future

2012-05-14 Thread Joshua Lee
Dear Freesurfers, Over the last years, MR imaging technology hasimproved such that sub 1-mm isotropic scans can be obtained with good signal to noise characteristics. For example, our lab uses 0.7mm isotropic structural MR images. I understand that the Freesurfer pipeline will up-sample these to

Re: [Freesurfer] Freesurfer 1mm Isotropic standard and the Future

2012-05-14 Thread Bruce Fischl
Hi Joshua yes, we already have upgraded mris_make_surfaces to take higher res data and refine the surfaces with it. Haven't tried it on the aseg yet, but if you upload a sample dataset I could see how hard it is. cheers Bruce On Mon, 14 May 2012, Joshua Lee wrote: Dear Freesurfers, Over

Re: [Freesurfer] Freesurfer 1mm Isotropic standard and the Future

2012-05-14 Thread Matt Glasser
] Freesurfer 1mm Isotropic standard and the Future Hi Joshua yes, we already have upgraded mris_make_surfaces to take higher res data and refine the surfaces with it. Haven't tried it on the aseg yet, but if you upload a sample dataset I could see how hard it is. cheers Bruce On Mon, 14 May 2012

Re: [Freesurfer] Freesurfer 1mm Isotropic standard and the Future

2012-05-14 Thread Michael Waskom
Hi Bruce, Is there a flag for this on recon-all? Or do you need to use mri_make_surfaces directly? Best, Michael On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduwrote: Hi Joshua yes, we already have upgraded mris_make_surfaces to take higher res data and refine the