Re: [Freesurfer] Fw: question on GLM

2019-09-10 Thread Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.
Yes, I think so

On 9/6/19 12:56 PM, Barletta, Valeria wrote:
> I did a correction for multiple comparison for every analysis... The 
> interaction survived.
> The interaction voxels do not overlap, apparently. So can I use doss 
> and consider my results ok?
> 
> *From:* freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
>  on behalf of Greve, Douglas 
> N.,Ph.D. 
> *Sent:* Friday, September 6, 2019 12:46 PM
> *To:* freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
> *Subject:* Re: [Freesurfer] Fw: question on GLM
> See whether the interaction survives correction for multiple 
> comparisons. If it does not, then proceed with doss. If it does not, 
> see whether the interaction voxels overlap with your contrast of 
> interest; if not, then proceed with doss.
>
> On 9/6/2019 11:28 AM, Barletta, Valeria wrote:
>> So when I use doss   (and the contrast  -1 +1 0), I have very similar 
>> results to those that I got when I completely remove age:
>>
>>
>> 
>> *From:* freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
>> <mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> 
>>  
>> <mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> on behalf of Greve, 
>> Douglas N.,Ph.D.  <mailto:dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu>
>> *Sent:* Friday, September 6, 2019 10:38 AM
>> *To:* freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
>> <mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> 
>>  <mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>> *Subject:* Re: [Freesurfer] Fw: question on GLM
>> Did you try using DOSS?
>>
>> On 9/6/2019 9:51 AM, Barletta, Valeria wrote:
>>> Dear Doug,
>>> As you suggested yesterday, I launched the GLM to check for 
>>> interactions group-age with the contrast:
>>> 0 0 +1 -1
>>> And I obtained this image:
>>>
>>> Then I re-launched my model including age as a covariate and I 
>>> obtained very similar results:
>>>
>>>
>>> Finally, I re-launched the model excluding age and I obtained a very 
>>> different thing, which is actually more consistent with my data:
>>>
>>>
>>> How shall I interpret this? Shall I exclude age from my analysis? (I 
>>> do not really expect it to have an influence on my variable y)
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> Vale
>>> 
>>> *From:* freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
>>> <mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> 
>>>  
>>> <mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> on behalf of Greve, 
>>> Douglas N.,Ph.D.  
>>> <mailto:dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu>
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 28, 2019 6:03 PM
>>> *To:* freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
>>> <mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> 
>>>  <mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>>> *Subject:* Re: [Freesurfer] Fw: question on GLM
>>> It is showing
>>> b = g2 - g1
>>> so negative means that g1 > g2
>>>
>>>
>>> On 8/28/19 1:59 PM, Barletta, Valeria wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Forgot to report my contrast matrix:
>>> >
>>> > -1 1 0 0
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > Valeria
>>> > 
>>> 
>>> > *From:* Barletta, Valeria
>>> > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 28, 2019 1:02 PM
>>> > *To:* Freesurfer support list  
>>> <mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>>> > *Subject:* question on GLM
>>> > Good afternoon!
>>> > I have a question on the Freesurfer GLM.
>>> > The command:
>>> >
>>> > mri_glmfit-sim --glmdir
>>> > ${glm_dir}/${hemi}_contrast-${contrast}_${surfname_cme} --cache 
>>> 1.3 neg
>>> >
>>> > is giving me blue clusters (see attached picture). Do blue clusters
>>> > mean that my variable y is LOWER in the FIRST or the SECOND group
>>> > listed in the FSGD file?
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > Valeria
>>> >
>>> > ___
>>> > Freesurfer mailing list
>>> > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>>> > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Freesurfer mailing list
>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Freesurfer mailing list
>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu  <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Freesurfer mailing list
>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu  <mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


Re: [Freesurfer] Fw: question on GLM

2019-08-28 Thread Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.
It is showing
b = g2 - g1
so negative means that g1 > g2


On 8/28/19 1:59 PM, Barletta, Valeria wrote:
>
> Forgot to report my contrast matrix:
>
> -1 1 0 0
>
>
> Thanks,
> Valeria
> 
> *From:* Barletta, Valeria
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 28, 2019 1:02 PM
> *To:* Freesurfer support list 
> *Subject:* question on GLM
> Good afternoon!
> I have a question on the Freesurfer GLM.
> The command:
>
> mri_glmfit-sim --glmdir 
> ${glm_dir}/${hemi}_contrast-${contrast}_${surfname_cme} --cache 1.3 neg
>
> is giving me blue clusters (see attached picture). Do blue clusters 
> mean that my variable y is LOWER in the FIRST or the SECOND group 
> listed in the FSGD file?
>
> Thanks,
> Valeria
>
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer