> <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2017 4:55 PM
> To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] ROI labeling?
>
> what do you mean by an average of the mask? Such an average would not be
> binary.
>
>
> On 08/03/2017 04:30 PM,
3, 2017 4:55 PM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] ROI labeling?
what do you mean by an average of the mask? Such an average would not be
binary.
On 08/03/2017 04:30 PM, Sadie Marvel wrote:
> And what if I wanted to compute just one ROI mask (for each region) that i
masks?
>
> From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> <freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> on behalf of Douglas N Greve
> <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2017 4:15 PM
> To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> Subject: Re: [Freesu
e
<gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2017 4:15 PM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] ROI labeling?
If you are just going to use them as a mask for mri_glmfit, then you can
just pass it as --mask or --label, no need to map it back to the
individual (whi
If you are just going to use them as a mask for mri_glmfit, then you can
just pass it as --mask or --label, no need to map it back to the
individual (which you could do with mri_surf2surf)
On 08/03/2017 04:08 PM, Sadie Marvel wrote:
> Hi again Freesurfers,
>
> I am doing a surface based ROI
Hi again Freesurfers,
I am doing a surface based ROI analysis where for each subject, isomorphic ROIs
of 300 vertices (centered around peak functional activations) were found on the
fsaverage surface space. I was wondering if I should register these masks that
I have created back to each
