Re: [Freesurfer] Cortical Thickness Zero Values

2016-10-21 Thread Douglas Greve
For #1, do the parcellations look ok? Do the surfaces look ok in the volume? On 10/20/16 4:09 PM, Taha Abdullah wrote: Hi Dr. Fischl and Dr. Greve, #1 So moving the mouse over the medial wall seems to have all vertices within that to have a zero mm thickness as expected. The yellow outline i

Re: [Freesurfer] Cortical Thickness Zero Values

2016-10-20 Thread Bruce Fischl
I guess you could compute the intersection of the cortex labels. Easy enough to do in matlab once you map them all to a common space. Not sure if we have anything that will do it, but we might. Perhaps someone else knows? cheers Bruce cheers Bruce On Thu, 20 Oct 2016, Taha Abdullah wrote:

Re: [Freesurfer] Cortical Thickness Zero Values

2016-10-20 Thread Taha Abdullah
Hi Dr. Fischl and Dr. Greve, So moving the mouse over the medial wall seems to have all vertices within that to have a zero mm thickness as expected. The yellow outline is the lh.cortex.label and it seems to look good to me i.e. majority of the medial wall is properly masked. To be noted, this was

Re: [Freesurfer] Cortical Thickness Zero Values

2016-10-18 Thread Bruce Fischl
Hi Taha none that I can think of. The medial wall is pretty substantial region though - I am more concerned about your subject with only 53 vertices in it. You can visualize it by loading the ?h.cortex.label onto the inflated surface. Everything not in the label should be set to 0 cheers Bru

Re: [Freesurfer] Cortical Thickness Zero Values

2016-10-18 Thread Taha Abdullah
I see now, thanks for the answer. If I may, is there any particular reason why such a disparity between two subjects, is this due to anatomical variability between individuals? I was surprised by the 9,000 values that was missing. On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Douglas Greve wrote: > The enti

Re: [Freesurfer] Cortical Thickness Zero Values

2016-10-14 Thread Douglas Greve
The entire medial wall has thickness values of 0 because there is no cortex there. There needs to be a surface in that area because we need a closed surface. On 10/12/16 8:10 PM, Taha Abdullah wrote: Hello All, Quick question, I ran recon-all with the qcache option and after converting the

[Freesurfer] Cortical Thickness Zero Values

2016-10-12 Thread Taha Abdullah
Hello All, Quick question, I ran recon-all with the qcache option and after converting the ?.thickness.fsaverage.mgh to an ascii text file via mri_convert I am noticing some vertices have 0mm thickness and it varies, for example, one subject had 53 vertices labeled as zeros while another had over