7 4:55 PM
> To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] ROI labeling?
>
> what do you mean by an average of the mask? Such an average would not be
> binary.
>
>
> On 08/03/2017 04:30 PM, Sadie Marvel wrote:
>> And what if I wanted to compute just one ROI
l ROI masks?
>
> From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> on behalf of Douglas N Greve
>
> Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2017 4:15 PM
> To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] ROI labeling?
>
> If you are just going to use them
masks?
>
> From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> on behalf of Douglas N Greve
>
> Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2017 4:15 PM
> To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] ROI labeling?
>
> If you are just going to use them as a mask for mri
: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] ROI labeling?
If you are just going to use them as a mask for mri_glmfit, then you can
just pass it as --mask or --label, no need to map it back to the
individual (which you could do with mri_surf2surf)
On 08/03/2017 04:08 PM, Sadie Marvel wrote
If you are just going to use them as a mask for mri_glmfit, then you can
just pass it as --mask or --label, no need to map it back to the
individual (which you could do with mri_surf2surf)
On 08/03/2017 04:08 PM, Sadie Marvel wrote:
> Hi again Freesurfers,
>
> I am doing a surface based ROI ana