Re: [Freesurfer] recon-all at native resolution
External Email - Use Caution Thanx Doug. Tried the patch and got similar results to -hires. Must be the data and tissue contrast in that region where WM is difficult to discern. These are 2yo subjects. We also tried baby freesurfer with poorer results. Jim From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu On Behalf Of Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. Sent: Monday, October 28, 2019 9:22 AM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] recon-all at native resolution Yes, this is the issue we have with the high res stream in v6. As I said, you can use the patch that I pointed to below to get better surfaces. On 10/25/19 12:30 PM, Alexopoulos, Dimitrios wrote: External Email - Use Caution Opps, here are the snapshots. The aseg subcortical look good using either the -hires or -conf2hires flags. The cortical parcellation is not including some ctx in several regions including the region below. [cid:image001.png@01D58D7A.58A802F0] [cid:image002.png@01D58D7A.58A802F0] -Original Message- From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> <mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> On Behalf Of Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. Sent: Friday, October 25, 2019 11:17 AM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] recon-all at native resolution There was no snapshot. Can you resend? On 10/24/2019 7:06 PM, Alexopoulos, Dimitrios wrote: > External Email - Use Caution > > I apologize for the confusion. Whether I use the -hires or -conf2hires flag > the subcortical segmentations look good. > > The cortical segmentations have some issues in the ventral medial area (see > snapshot below), which is likely caused by difficulty in FS delineating WM > superior to the gyrus rectus. I'm not sure how to correct this so I was > thinking the higher resolution data may lead to a better WM segmentation? > > Is my thinking correct? If so, which flag is best? > > Jim > > > -Original Message- > From: > freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> > > mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>> > On Behalf Of Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2019 5:37 PM > To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> > Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] recon-all at native resolution > > You mean the surfaces using -hires look fine? If so, then continue to > use -hires > > On 10/24/19 6:32 PM, Alexopoulos, Dimitrios wrote: >> External Email - Use Caution >> >> The cortical parcellations in the aseg and aparc+seg have some issues in the >> orbital prefrontal regions and we're were hoping that the higher resolution >> images would help. The surfaces look fine. >> >> We should use the -hires flag instead in this scenario? >> >> Thx. >> >> -Original Message- >> From: >> freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> >> >> mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>> >> On Behalf Of Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. >> Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2019 5:06 PM >> To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> >> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] recon-all at native resolution >> >> oh, sorry, yes it is. The surfaces are placed on the high res >> volumes, but the aseg will be at 1mm. If you need the aseg at >> highres, then you will need to use the -hires flag (but the surfaces >> will suffer) >> >> On 10/24/19 2:55 PM, Alexopoulos, Dimitrios wrote: >>>External Email - Use Caution >>> >>> Doug, >>> >>> I copied over files and ran using the -conf2hires flag, however, the >>> orig.mgz/brainmask.mgz are resampled to 1mm isotropic not the native 0.8mm. >>> >>> Using the -hires flag maintains the orig.mgz/brainmask.mgz at native 0.8mm >>> resolution. >>> >>> Is this expected when running -conf2hires? >>> >>> Jim >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: >>> freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> >>> >>> mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>> >>> On Behalf Of Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. >>> Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2019 11:54 AM >>> To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> >>> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] recon-all at native resolution >>> >
Re: [Freesurfer] recon-all at native resolution
Yes, this is the issue we have with the high res stream in v6. As I said, you can use the patch that I pointed to below to get better surfaces. On 10/25/19 12:30 PM, Alexopoulos, Dimitrios wrote: External Email - Use Caution Opps, here are the snapshots. The aseg subcortical look good using either the –hires or –conf2hires flags. The cortical parcellation is not including some ctx in several regions including the region below. [cid:part1.6B18B5A1.452BD44E@mgh.harvard.edu] [cid:part2.86F8F402.1E6C2D82@mgh.harvard.edu] -Original Message- From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> <mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> On Behalf Of Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. Sent: Friday, October 25, 2019 11:17 AM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] recon-all at native resolution There was no snapshot. Can you resend? On 10/24/2019 7:06 PM, Alexopoulos, Dimitrios wrote: > External Email - Use Caution > > I apologize for the confusion. Whether I use the -hires or -conf2hires flag > the subcortical segmentations look good. > > The cortical segmentations have some issues in the ventral medial area (see > snapshot below), which is likely caused by difficulty in FS delineating WM > superior to the gyrus rectus. I'm not sure how to correct this so I was > thinking the higher resolution data may lead to a better WM segmentation? > > Is my thinking correct? If so, which flag is best? > > Jim > > > -Original Message- > From: > freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> > > mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>> > On Behalf Of Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2019 5:37 PM > To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> > Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] recon-all at native resolution > > You mean the surfaces using -hires look fine? If so, then continue to > use -hires > > On 10/24/19 6:32 PM, Alexopoulos, Dimitrios wrote: >> External Email - Use Caution >> >> The cortical parcellations in the aseg and aparc+seg have some issues in the >> orbital prefrontal regions and we're were hoping that the higher resolution >> images would help. The surfaces look fine. >> >> We should use the -hires flag instead in this scenario? >> >> Thx. >> >> -Original Message- >> From: >> freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> >> >> mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>> >> On Behalf Of Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. >> Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2019 5:06 PM >> To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> >> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] recon-all at native resolution >> >> oh, sorry, yes it is. The surfaces are placed on the high res >> volumes, but the aseg will be at 1mm. If you need the aseg at >> highres, then you will need to use the -hires flag (but the surfaces >> will suffer) >> >> On 10/24/19 2:55 PM, Alexopoulos, Dimitrios wrote: >>>External Email - Use Caution >>> >>> Doug, >>> >>> I copied over files and ran using the -conf2hires flag, however, the >>> orig.mgz/brainmask.mgz are resampled to 1mm isotropic not the native 0.8mm. >>> >>> Using the -hires flag maintains the orig.mgz/brainmask.mgz at native 0.8mm >>> resolution. >>> >>> Is this expected when running -conf2hires? >>> >>> Jim >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: >>> freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> >>> >>> mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>> >>> On Behalf Of Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. >>> Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2019 11:54 AM >>> To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> >>> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] recon-all at native resolution >>> >>> better to use a patch I created for the HCP, see >>> https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pub/dist/freesurfer/6.0.0-patch/h >>> c >>> p >>> /readme >>> >>> >>> On 10/15/19 12:13 PM, Alexopoulos, Dimitrios wrote: >>>>External Email - Use Caution >>>> >>>> We have data acquired at 0.8mm isotropic and would like to maintain >&g
Re: [Freesurfer] recon-all at native resolution
External Email - Use Caution Opps, here are the snapshots. The aseg subcortical look good using either the -hires or -conf2hires flags. The cortical parcellation is not including some ctx in several regions including the region below. [cid:image001.png@01D58B27.A63D2C70] [cid:image002.png@01D58B27.A63D2C70] -Original Message- From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu On Behalf Of Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. Sent: Friday, October 25, 2019 11:17 AM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] recon-all at native resolution There was no snapshot. Can you resend? On 10/24/2019 7:06 PM, Alexopoulos, Dimitrios wrote: > External Email - Use Caution > > I apologize for the confusion. Whether I use the -hires or -conf2hires flag > the subcortical segmentations look good. > > The cortical segmentations have some issues in the ventral medial area (see > snapshot below), which is likely caused by difficulty in FS delineating WM > superior to the gyrus rectus. I'm not sure how to correct this so I was > thinking the higher resolution data may lead to a better WM segmentation? > > Is my thinking correct? If so, which flag is best? > > Jim > > > -Original Message- > From: > freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> > > mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>> > On Behalf Of Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2019 5:37 PM > To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> > Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] recon-all at native resolution > > You mean the surfaces using -hires look fine? If so, then continue to > use -hires > > On 10/24/19 6:32 PM, Alexopoulos, Dimitrios wrote: >> External Email - Use Caution >> >> The cortical parcellations in the aseg and aparc+seg have some issues in the >> orbital prefrontal regions and we're were hoping that the higher resolution >> images would help. The surfaces look fine. >> >> We should use the -hires flag instead in this scenario? >> >> Thx. >> >> -Original Message- >> From: >> freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> >> >> mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>> >> On Behalf Of Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. >> Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2019 5:06 PM >> To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> >> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] recon-all at native resolution >> >> oh, sorry, yes it is. The surfaces are placed on the high res >> volumes, but the aseg will be at 1mm. If you need the aseg at >> highres, then you will need to use the -hires flag (but the surfaces >> will suffer) >> >> On 10/24/19 2:55 PM, Alexopoulos, Dimitrios wrote: >>>External Email - Use Caution >>> >>> Doug, >>> >>> I copied over files and ran using the -conf2hires flag, however, the >>> orig.mgz/brainmask.mgz are resampled to 1mm isotropic not the native 0.8mm. >>> >>> Using the -hires flag maintains the orig.mgz/brainmask.mgz at native 0.8mm >>> resolution. >>> >>> Is this expected when running -conf2hires? >>> >>> Jim >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: >>> freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> >>> >>> mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>> >>> On Behalf Of Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. >>> Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2019 11:54 AM >>> To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> >>> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] recon-all at native resolution >>> >>> better to use a patch I created for the HCP, see >>> https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pub/dist/freesurfer/6.0.0-patch/h >>> c >>> p >>> /readme >>> >>> >>> On 10/15/19 12:13 PM, Alexopoulos, Dimitrios wrote: >>>>External Email - Use Caution >>>> >>>> We have data acquired at 0.8mm isotropic and would like to maintain >>>> this resolution in the processing stream rather than FS resampling to 1mm. >>>> >>>> Is the command to do this 'recon-all -hires -all'? >>>> >>>> Are there any drawback to doing this? >>>> >>>> Jim >>>> >>>>
Re: [Freesurfer] recon-all at native resolution
There was no snapshot. Can you resend? On 10/24/2019 7:06 PM, Alexopoulos, Dimitrios wrote: > External Email - Use Caution > > I apologize for the confusion. Whether I use the -hires or -conf2hires flag > the subcortical segmentations look good. > > The cortical segmentations have some issues in the ventral medial area (see > snapshot below), which is likely caused by difficulty in FS delineating WM > superior to the gyrus rectus. I'm not sure how to correct this so I was > thinking the higher resolution data may lead to a better WM segmentation? > > Is my thinking correct? If so, which flag is best? > > Jim > > > -Original Message- > From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > On Behalf Of Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2019 5:37 PM > To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] recon-all at native resolution > > You mean the surfaces using -hires look fine? If so, then continue to use > -hires > > On 10/24/19 6:32 PM, Alexopoulos, Dimitrios wrote: >> External Email - Use Caution >> >> The cortical parcellations in the aseg and aparc+seg have some issues in the >> orbital prefrontal regions and we're were hoping that the higher resolution >> images would help. The surfaces look fine. >> >> We should use the -hires flag instead in this scenario? >> >> Thx. >> >> -Original Message- >> From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu >> On Behalf Of Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. >> Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2019 5:06 PM >> To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu >> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] recon-all at native resolution >> >> oh, sorry, yes it is. The surfaces are placed on the high res volumes, >> but the aseg will be at 1mm. If you need the aseg at highres, then you >> will need to use the -hires flag (but the surfaces will suffer) >> >> On 10/24/19 2:55 PM, Alexopoulos, Dimitrios wrote: >>>External Email - Use Caution >>> >>> Doug, >>> >>> I copied over files and ran using the -conf2hires flag, however, the >>> orig.mgz/brainmask.mgz are resampled to 1mm isotropic not the native 0.8mm. >>> >>> Using the -hires flag maintains the orig.mgz/brainmask.mgz at native 0.8mm >>> resolution. >>> >>> Is this expected when running -conf2hires? >>> >>> Jim >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu >>> On Behalf Of Greve, Douglas >>> N.,Ph.D. >>> Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2019 11:54 AM >>> To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu >>> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] recon-all at native resolution >>> >>> better to use a patch I created for the HCP, see >>> https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pub/dist/freesurfer/6.0.0-patch/hc >>> p >>> /readme >>> >>> >>> On 10/15/19 12:13 PM, Alexopoulos, Dimitrios wrote: >>>>External Email - Use Caution >>>> >>>> We have data acquired at 0.8mm isotropic and would like to maintain >>>> this resolution in the processing stream rather than FS resampling to 1mm. >>>> >>>> Is the command to do this 'recon-all -hires -all'? >>>> >>>> Are there any drawback to doing this? >>>> >>>> Jim >>>> >>>> >>>> - >>>> - >>>> -- >>>> >>>> The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected >>>> Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. >>>> If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any >>>> unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in >>>> reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. >>>> If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify >>>> the sender via telephone or return mail. >>>> >>>> >>>> ___ >>>> Freesurfer mailing list >>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu >>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer >>> ___ >>> Freesurfer mailing list >>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu >>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer >>> >>> >>> The materials in th
Re: [Freesurfer] recon-all at native resolution
External Email - Use Caution I apologize for the confusion. Whether I use the -hires or -conf2hires flag the subcortical segmentations look good. The cortical segmentations have some issues in the ventral medial area (see snapshot below), which is likely caused by difficulty in FS delineating WM superior to the gyrus rectus. I'm not sure how to correct this so I was thinking the higher resolution data may lead to a better WM segmentation? Is my thinking correct? If so, which flag is best? Jim -Original Message- From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu On Behalf Of Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2019 5:37 PM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] recon-all at native resolution You mean the surfaces using -hires look fine? If so, then continue to use -hires On 10/24/19 6:32 PM, Alexopoulos, Dimitrios wrote: > External Email - Use Caution > > The cortical parcellations in the aseg and aparc+seg have some issues in the > orbital prefrontal regions and we're were hoping that the higher resolution > images would help. The surfaces look fine. > > We should use the -hires flag instead in this scenario? > > Thx. > > -Original Message- > From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > On Behalf Of Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2019 5:06 PM > To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] recon-all at native resolution > > oh, sorry, yes it is. The surfaces are placed on the high res volumes, > but the aseg will be at 1mm. If you need the aseg at highres, then you > will need to use the -hires flag (but the surfaces will suffer) > > On 10/24/19 2:55 PM, Alexopoulos, Dimitrios wrote: >> External Email - Use Caution >> >> Doug, >> >> I copied over files and ran using the -conf2hires flag, however, the >> orig.mgz/brainmask.mgz are resampled to 1mm isotropic not the native 0.8mm. >> >> Using the -hires flag maintains the orig.mgz/brainmask.mgz at native 0.8mm >> resolution. >> >> Is this expected when running -conf2hires? >> >> Jim >> >> -Original Message- >> From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu >> On Behalf Of Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. >> Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2019 11:54 AM >> To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu >> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] recon-all at native resolution >> >> better to use a patch I created for the HCP, see >> https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pub/dist/freesurfer/6.0.0-patch/hc >> p >> /readme >> >> >> On 10/15/19 12:13 PM, Alexopoulos, Dimitrios wrote: >>> External Email - Use Caution >>> >>> We have data acquired at 0.8mm isotropic and would like to maintain >>> this resolution in the processing stream rather than FS resampling to 1mm. >>> >>> Is the command to do this 'recon-all -hires -all'? >>> >>> Are there any drawback to doing this? >>> >>> Jim >>> >>> >>> - >>> - >>> -- >>> >>> The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected >>> Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. >>> If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any >>> unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in >>> reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. >>> If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify >>> the sender via telephone or return mail. >>> >>> >>> ___ >>> Freesurfer mailing list >>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu >>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer >> ___ >> Freesurfer mailing list >> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu >> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer >> >> >> The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected >> Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you >> are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, >> disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents >> of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email >> in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail. >> >> >> ___ >> Freesurfer m
Re: [Freesurfer] recon-all at native resolution
You mean the surfaces using -hires look fine? If so, then continue to use -hires On 10/24/19 6:32 PM, Alexopoulos, Dimitrios wrote: > External Email - Use Caution > > The cortical parcellations in the aseg and aparc+seg have some issues in the > orbital prefrontal regions and we're were hoping that the higher resolution > images would help. The surfaces look fine. > > We should use the -hires flag instead in this scenario? > > Thx. > > -Original Message- > From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > On Behalf Of Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2019 5:06 PM > To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] recon-all at native resolution > > oh, sorry, yes it is. The surfaces are placed on the high res volumes, but > the aseg will be at 1mm. If you need the aseg at highres, then you will need > to use the -hires flag (but the surfaces will suffer) > > On 10/24/19 2:55 PM, Alexopoulos, Dimitrios wrote: >> External Email - Use Caution >> >> Doug, >> >> I copied over files and ran using the -conf2hires flag, however, the >> orig.mgz/brainmask.mgz are resampled to 1mm isotropic not the native 0.8mm. >> >> Using the -hires flag maintains the orig.mgz/brainmask.mgz at native 0.8mm >> resolution. >> >> Is this expected when running -conf2hires? >> >> Jim >> >> -Original Message- >> From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu >> On Behalf Of Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. >> Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2019 11:54 AM >> To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu >> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] recon-all at native resolution >> >> better to use a patch I created for the HCP, see >> https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pub/dist/freesurfer/6.0.0-patch/hcp >> /readme >> >> >> On 10/15/19 12:13 PM, Alexopoulos, Dimitrios wrote: >>> External Email - Use Caution >>> >>> We have data acquired at 0.8mm isotropic and would like to maintain >>> this resolution in the processing stream rather than FS resampling to 1mm. >>> >>> Is the command to do this 'recon-all -hires -all'? >>> >>> Are there any drawback to doing this? >>> >>> Jim >>> >>> - >>> - >>> -- >>> >>> The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected >>> Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If >>> you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized >>> use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on >>> the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have >>> received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender >>> via telephone or return mail. >>> >>> >>> ___ >>> Freesurfer mailing list >>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu >>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer >> ___ >> Freesurfer mailing list >> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu >> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer >> >> >> The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected >> Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you >> are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, >> disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents >> of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email >> in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail. >> >> >> ___ >> Freesurfer mailing list >> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu >> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer > > ___ > Freesurfer mailing list > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer > > > The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected > Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are > not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, > copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this > information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, > please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail. > > > ___ > Freesurfer mailing list > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Re: [Freesurfer] recon-all at native resolution
External Email - Use Caution The cortical parcellations in the aseg and aparc+seg have some issues in the orbital prefrontal regions and we're were hoping that the higher resolution images would help. The surfaces look fine. We should use the -hires flag instead in this scenario? Thx. -Original Message- From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu On Behalf Of Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2019 5:06 PM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] recon-all at native resolution oh, sorry, yes it is. The surfaces are placed on the high res volumes, but the aseg will be at 1mm. If you need the aseg at highres, then you will need to use the -hires flag (but the surfaces will suffer) On 10/24/19 2:55 PM, Alexopoulos, Dimitrios wrote: > External Email - Use Caution > > Doug, > > I copied over files and ran using the -conf2hires flag, however, the > orig.mgz/brainmask.mgz are resampled to 1mm isotropic not the native 0.8mm. > > Using the -hires flag maintains the orig.mgz/brainmask.mgz at native 0.8mm > resolution. > > Is this expected when running -conf2hires? > > Jim > > -Original Message- > From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > On Behalf Of Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. > Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2019 11:54 AM > To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] recon-all at native resolution > > better to use a patch I created for the HCP, see > https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pub/dist/freesurfer/6.0.0-patch/hcp > /readme > > > On 10/15/19 12:13 PM, Alexopoulos, Dimitrios wrote: >> External Email - Use Caution >> >> We have data acquired at 0.8mm isotropic and would like to maintain >> this resolution in the processing stream rather than FS resampling to 1mm. >> >> Is the command to do this 'recon-all -hires -all'? >> >> Are there any drawback to doing this? >> >> Jim >> >> - >> - >> -- >> >> The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected >> Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If >> you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized >> use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on >> the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have >> received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender >> via telephone or return mail. >> >> >> ___ >> Freesurfer mailing list >> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu >> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer > > ___ > Freesurfer mailing list > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer > > > The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected > Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are > not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, > copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this > information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, > please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail. > > > ___ > Freesurfer mailing list > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail. ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Re: [Freesurfer] recon-all at native resolution
oh, sorry, yes it is. The surfaces are placed on the high res volumes, but the aseg will be at 1mm. If you need the aseg at highres, then you will need to use the -hires flag (but the surfaces will suffer) On 10/24/19 2:55 PM, Alexopoulos, Dimitrios wrote: > External Email - Use Caution > > Doug, > > I copied over files and ran using the -conf2hires flag, however, the > orig.mgz/brainmask.mgz are resampled to 1mm isotropic not the native 0.8mm. > > Using the -hires flag maintains the orig.mgz/brainmask.mgz at native 0.8mm > resolution. > > Is this expected when running -conf2hires? > > Jim > > -Original Message- > From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > On Behalf Of Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. > Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2019 11:54 AM > To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] recon-all at native resolution > > better to use a patch I created for the HCP, see > https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pub/dist/freesurfer/6.0.0-patch/hcp/readme > > > On 10/15/19 12:13 PM, Alexopoulos, Dimitrios wrote: >> External Email - Use Caution >> >> We have data acquired at 0.8mm isotropic and would like to maintain >> this resolution in the processing stream rather than FS resampling to 1mm. >> >> Is the command to do this 'recon-all -hires -all'? >> >> Are there any drawback to doing this? >> >> Jim >> >> -- >> -- >> >> The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected >> Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If >> you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized >> use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on >> the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have >> received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via >> telephone or return mail. >> >> >> ___ >> Freesurfer mailing list >> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu >> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer > > ___ > Freesurfer mailing list > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer > > > The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected > Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are > not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, > copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this > information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, > please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail. > > > ___ > Freesurfer mailing list > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Re: [Freesurfer] recon-all at native resolution
External Email - Use Caution Doug, I copied over files and ran using the -conf2hires flag, however, the orig.mgz/brainmask.mgz are resampled to 1mm isotropic not the native 0.8mm. Using the -hires flag maintains the orig.mgz/brainmask.mgz at native 0.8mm resolution. Is this expected when running -conf2hires? Jim -Original Message- From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu On Behalf Of Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2019 11:54 AM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] recon-all at native resolution better to use a patch I created for the HCP, see https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pub/dist/freesurfer/6.0.0-patch/hcp/readme On 10/15/19 12:13 PM, Alexopoulos, Dimitrios wrote: > > External Email - Use Caution > > We have data acquired at 0.8mm isotropic and would like to maintain > this resolution in the processing stream rather than FS resampling to 1mm. > > Is the command to do this 'recon-all -hires -all'? > > Are there any drawback to doing this? > > Jim > > -- > -- > > The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected > Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If > you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized > use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on > the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have > received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via > telephone or return mail. > > > ___ > Freesurfer mailing list > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail. ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Re: [Freesurfer] recon-all at native resolution
External Email - Use Caution Thanks. Will give it a try. -Original Message- From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu On Behalf Of Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2019 11:54 AM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] recon-all at native resolution better to use a patch I created for the HCP, see https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pub/dist/freesurfer/6.0.0-patch/hcp/readme On 10/15/19 12:13 PM, Alexopoulos, Dimitrios wrote: > > External Email - Use Caution > > We have data acquired at 0.8mm isotropic and would like to maintain > this resolution in the processing stream rather than FS resampling to 1mm. > > Is the command to do this 'recon-all -hires -all'? > > Are there any drawback to doing this? > > Jim > > -- > -- > > The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected > Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If > you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized > use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on > the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have > received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via > telephone or return mail. > > > ___ > Freesurfer mailing list > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail. ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Re: [Freesurfer] recon-all at native resolution
better to use a patch I created for the HCP, see https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pub/dist/freesurfer/6.0.0-patch/hcp/readme On 10/15/19 12:13 PM, Alexopoulos, Dimitrios wrote: > > External Email - Use Caution > > We have data acquired at 0.8mm isotropic and would like to maintain > this resolution in the processing stream rather than FS resampling to 1mm. > > Is the command to do this ‘recon-all -hires -all’? > > Are there any drawback to doing this? > > Jim > > > > The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected > Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If > you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized > use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on > the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have > received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via > telephone or return mail. > > > ___ > Freesurfer mailing list > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
