Re: [Freesurfer] registrations

2020-03-06 Thread Douglas N. Greve
why not just use the aseg? it has been cleaned up with the surfaces, so it should represent everything inside the pial surface pretty well. On 3/2/2020 4:52 PM, Octavian Lie wrote: > External Email - Use Caution > > Dear Bruce & All, > > Sure, I wanted some advice from the greats before

Re: [Freesurfer] registrations

2020-03-02 Thread Octavian Lie
External Email - Use Caution Dear Bruce & All, Sure, I wanted some advice from the greats before registering pre and posteresection (intrasubject) scans. I tried both registrations on several patient data, bbregister clearly superior to mri_robust_register (used with orig/mgz)

Re: [Freesurfer] registrations

2020-02-29 Thread Bruce Fischl
I think most of these questions are for Doug and Martin, but why don't you try them both and see if either works out of the box? I would not use the brain.mgz or T1.mgz as they are aggressively normalized, unless you have run both the preop and postop scans through recon-all. You'll want the

Re: [Freesurfer] registrations

2020-02-29 Thread Octavian Lie
External Email - Use Caution Dear Bruce, thank you for your replies. I planned using this line for intrasubject pre to postop (postresection) MRI T1 registration 1. with mri_robust_register: mri_robust_register --mov postop.mgz --dst preop.mgz --lta posttopre.lta --mapmov

Re: [Freesurfer] registrations

2020-02-23 Thread Bruce Fischl
Hi Octavian 1. Not sure - you should try them. If you have reasonable surfaces I think bbreg lets you specify masks to ignore, which should be giant help in this scenario. On the other hand, mri_robust_register does this automatically. They are both relatively fast so why not try and see? 2.