I run FreeSWITCH on a Windows Server 2008 R2 (x64) box with several analog
lines and it works very well.
mercutioviz wrote:
And we shouldn't be using 1.0.4 anyway, should we? ;)
-MC
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Moises Silva
moises.si...@gmail.comwrote:
I've been using
-users] [Windows] Stable enough for production use?
Hello
Since Freeswitch is also available for Windows (and Mac, but I don't
anything about Macintosh), I'd like some feedback from users who routinely
run Freeswitch on that OS.
Is it stable enough to be used in production to handle a single
-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Fred-145
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 12:39 AM
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: [Freeswitch-users] [Windows] Stable enough for production use?
Hello
Since Freeswitch is also available for Windows (and Mac, but I don't
: freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:
freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Fred-145
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 12:39 AM
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: [Freeswitch-users] [Windows] Stable enough for production use?
Hello
Since
And we shouldn't be using 1.0.4 anyway, should we? ;)
-MC
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Moises Silva moises.si...@gmail.comwrote:
I've been using FreeSWITCH on Windows lately and seems to work pretty well.
Sangoma has been testing more and more lately the Windows drivers with
FreeSWITCH,
Hello
Since Freeswitch is also available for Windows (and Mac, but I don't
anything about Macintosh), I'd like some feedback from users who routinely
run Freeswitch on that OS.
Is it stable enough to be used in production to handle a single analog line
(ie. SOHO use), or should I warn customers
