I run FreeSWITCH on a Windows Server 2008 R2 (x64) box with several analog
lines and it works very well.
mercutioviz wrote:
>
> And we shouldn't be using 1.0.4 anyway, should we? ;)
> -MC
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Moises Silva
> wrote:
>
>> I've been using FreeSWITCH on Windows
And we shouldn't be using 1.0.4 anyway, should we? ;)
-MC
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Moises Silva wrote:
> I've been using FreeSWITCH on Windows lately and seems to work pretty well.
> Sangoma has been testing more and more lately the Windows drivers with
> FreeSWITCH, and I think you shou
essage-
> From: freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:
> freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Fred-145
> Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 12:39 AM
> To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
> Subject: [Freeswitch-users] [Windows] Stab
freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Fred-145
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 12:39 AM
To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Subject: [Freeswitch-users] [Windows] Stable enough for production use?
Hello
Since Freeswitch is also available for Windows (and Mac, b
-users@lists.freeswitch.org
Ämne: [Freeswitch-users] [Windows] Stable enough for production use?
Hello
Since Freeswitch is also available for Windows (and Mac, but I don't
anything about Macintosh), I'd like some feedback from users who routinely
run Freeswitch on that OS.
Is it st
Hello
Since Freeswitch is also available for Windows (and Mac, but I don't
anything about Macintosh), I'd like some feedback from users who routinely
run Freeswitch on that OS.
Is it stable enough to be used in production to handle a single analog line
(ie. SOHO use), or should I warn customers