Adrian… interesting.. thanks for tip… will look into that for DATV
www.slatsatn.net <http://www.slatsatn.net>
Mel
K0PFX
From: Adrian Musceac
Sent: Monday, October 26, 2020 9:48 AM
To: freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Freetel-codec2] Comments on the M17 p
>
>From: Adrian Musceac
>Sent: Monday, October 26, 2020 6:42 AM
>To: freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net
>Subject: Re: [Freetel-codec2] Comments on the M17 project
>
>
>
>Al,
>
>That's exactly what my FreeDV application does except
>1. It uses a general purpose vo
Subject: Re: [Freetel-codec2] Comments on the M17 project
Al,
That's exactly what my FreeDV application does except
1. It uses a general purpose voip protocol (Mumble) which can be extended with
arbitrary codecs including Codec2
2. It doesn't use the cloud. It uses a simple TCP server which
incorporate routing data to
>indicate what to repeat/rebroadcast and where.
>>
>> Just a thought for what [UTF-8?]itâs worth.
>>
>> Comments anyone?
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>> Dave [UTF-8?]â VK2DWG
>>
>>
>
ct: Re: [Freetel-codec2] Comments on the M17 project
Hi David VK2DWG,
Consider a HF "hot spot". Can receive say mode 700D which uses the mode 700C
codec.
adds the hot-spot callsign and sends to the cloud talk group HF1 and listeners
treat it like any other
talk group except, in his
for what [UTF-8?]itâs worth.
>
> Comments anyone?
>
>
> Regards
>
>
> Dave [UTF-8?]â VK2DWG
>
>
> From: walt...@k5wh.net
> Sent: Monday, 26 October 2020 12:47
> To: freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Freetel-codec2] Comments on
;
>
> From: Al Beard via Freetel-codec2
> Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2020 3:27 PM
> To: freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc: Al Beard
> Subject: Re: [Freetel-codec2] Comments on the M17 project
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> What about the "connection"
;mailto:freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Freetel-codec2] Comments on the M17 project
Thanks Walter
Unfortunately, as published, M17 is double the bandwidth that would be feasible
on Amateur HF using commonly available equipment.
However, imagine the possibilities i
guys for adding your ideas into the model,
and something might happen.
All the best..
Walter/K5WH
From: David Grove
Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2020 9:43 PM
To: freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Freetel-codec2] Comments on the M17 project
Thanks Walter
Sent: Monday, 26 October 2020 12:47
To: freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Freetel-codec2] Comments on the M17 project
Here ya go Alan. See if this can answer some if your questions on that.
https://m17-protocol-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
all the best
: Al Beard
Subject: Re: [Freetel-codec2] Comments on the M17 project
Hi all,
What about the "connection" to HF?
HF where we have bandwidth restrictions hence low bit-rate codecs.
That's why I asked the question:
In the M17 protocol, is there a "codec specifier&q
using it last night and it sounded great.
>
>
> Lots of great work happening in just the past week.
>
> Walter/K5WH
>
>
> From: gerh...@oe3gbb.eu
> Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2020 2:33 AM
> To: freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Freetel-cod
work happening in just the past week.
Walter/K5WH
From: gerh...@oe3gbb.eu
Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2020 2:33 AM
To: freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Freetel-codec2] Comments on the M17 project
Hello Walter and all others,
Very interesting project.
I think a step
, as their components are still
coming in from vendors.
Walter/K5WH
-Original Message-
From: David Rowe
Sent: Saturday, October 24, 2020 7:28 PM
To: freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Freetel-codec2] Comments on the M17 project
Thanks Walter. I was wondering about
If
>> > things move on with M17 then I will create a proper M17 Gateway program
>> > with echo functionality to allow for dynamic control of the reflector,
>> > but that is far off at the moment.
>> >
>> > I have tested my code against itself, and most of it seems to
far off at the moment.
> >
> > I have tested my code against itself, and most of it seems to work, some
> > corners have not been tested yet, but they will be in due course.
> >
> > If anyone has an M17 transceiver and wishes to play with the code, I'd
> > be inte
between reflectors to try that also.
Walter/K5WH
-Original Message-
From: Al Beard via Freetel-codec2
Sent: Saturday, October 24, 2020 8:09 PM
To: freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Al Beard
Subject: Re: [Freetel-codec2] Comments on the M17 project
Hi all
, October 24, 2020 7:28 PM
To: freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Freetel-codec2] Comments on the M17 project
Thanks Walter. I was wondering about this statement on the M17 page:
"M17 uses Codec2, written and developed by David Rowe. Codec2 outperforms
existing propri
Hi all,
Somewhere in the M17 protocol is there a Codec2 mode number?
As, my Freebeacon here could put the Codec2 data into a M17 reflector
but I'd like to stick to mode 700C data.
Alan VK2ZIW
On Sun, 25 Oct 2020 10:58:10 +1030, David Rowe wrote
> Thanks Walter. I was wondering about this
o it is early in the development stages, but things are indeed moving
> fast, as of just the ast few weeks.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Walter/K5WH
>
>
>
> *From:* Adrian Musceac
> *Sent:* Saturday, October 24, 2020 3:27 PM
> *To:* freetel-codec2@lists.so
@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Freetel-codec2] Comments on the M17 project
Hi Walter,
Is there like a mailing list of the project or something?
Adrian
On October 24, 2020 4:13:56 PM UTC, walt...@k5wh.net <mailto:walt...@k5wh.net>
wrote:
Several of us have been working wi
en Source World!
>
>
>
>Walter/K5WH
>
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Al Beard
>Sent: Saturday, October 24, 2020 12:52 AM
>To: freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net
>Subject: [Freetel-codec2] Comments on the M17 project
>
>
>
>Hi all,
>
>
>
>
> M17 is another great victory for the Open Source World!
>
>
>
> Walter/K5WH
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Al Beard
> Sent: Saturday, October 24, 2020 12:52 AM
> To: freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Fre
great victory for the Open Source World!
Walter/K5WH
-Original Message-
From: Al Beard
Sent: Saturday, October 24, 2020 12:52 AM
To: freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Freetel-codec2] Comments on the M17 project
Hi all,
I was looking at the M17 project
It is also possible to use one of the existing low-bandwidth text formats
on the upper or lower edge of the voice signal. The advantage being that
more people could read it.
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020, 10:54 PM Al Beard wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was looking at the M17 project and noticing their
Hi all,
I was looking at the M17 project and noticing their discussion
on callsign sending. Suggesting in 48 bits for Src and Dest, packing
the characters as RT11 filenames used to do. (Digital PDP-11 of 1975)
What I notice in our HF mode 700D, it has quite poor data reliability
particularly in
26 matches
Mail list logo
