Re: Proposing a new Idea for Freetype

2021-04-03 Thread Sagnik Mitra
Hello Alexei, We are sorry to propose our "pile of nonsense" idea. Won't do it again. Both of us liked the website, so thought of some improvement ideas. Good to hear such words from you. Also, we haven't mentioned our stacks or idea in detail regarding the "Full Stack Community Platform with

Re: Proposing a new Idea for Freetype

2021-04-03 Thread Alexei Podtelezhnikov
Hi Sagnik, Ok. In that case, you have to be specific about your ideas. What is that you find messy and what to improve? General "Full Stack" won't fly with us. You can submit your proposal to GSoC, but we do not give any guarantees up front. We have limited number of slots and our priorities are

Re: GSoC

2021-04-03 Thread sarthak bhardwaj
Alright! thanks for clearing that up :) On Sat, Apr 3, 2021 at 5:05 PM Alexei Podtelezhnikov wrote: > Dear applicants, > > GSoC is a competition. > > We'll select the best and the most realistic proposal for 6 weeks of > work. Do not try to boil the ocean or start from scratch! I guess you >

Re: Proposing a new Idea for Freetype

2021-04-03 Thread Alexei Podtelezhnikov
Our peers: https://skia.org/ is nice https://www.mesa3d.org/ is good https://www.openjpeg.org/ is good https://www.libpng.org/ is down In comparison, we stack pretty good. I do not see much need in improvement here. In other words, it's better be justified. Alexei

Re: Proposing a new Idea for Freetype

2021-04-03 Thread Nikhil Ramakrishnan
> > Maybe that could be used as a starting point? > > Starting point for what? > This was in reference to Werner's suggestion to improve the website. When we migrated the documentation to markdown, I had done a markdown version for the contents of freetype.org as well (should still be live at

Re: Proposing a new Idea for Freetype

2021-04-03 Thread Alexei Podtelezhnikov
> Maybe that could be used as a starting point? Starting point for what? The initial email is a pile of nonsense: Backend to Frontend, Full Stack Community Platform with ***Zero*** ***Intelligent*** ***Ideas*** hehind it. Our documentation website is much better than our peers' ones. We did

Re: Proposing a new Idea for Freetype

2021-04-03 Thread Nikhil Ramakrishnan
Quick note: We do have a markdown version of the website from a few years ago that we never actually transitioned to. Maybe that could be used as a starting point? Nikhil

Re: GSoC

2021-04-03 Thread Alexei Podtelezhnikov
Dear applicants, GSoC is a competition. We'll select the best and the most realistic proposal for 6 weeks of work. Do not try to boil the ocean or start from scratch! I guess you are allowed to coordinate right now to make sure that your proposals do not overlap, but you do not have to. The

Re: GSoC

2021-04-03 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Do share your remark over this or can I proceed according to what he > have suggested or what, accordingly i will see the things, and the > most ambiguous thing in current is - whether i have to make proposal > for the entire thing, or just for the subproject he suggested me to > do so.? As

Re: GSoC

2021-04-03 Thread sarthak bhardwaj
Hello mentors, Do share your remark over this or can I proceed according to what he have suggested or what, accordingly i will see the things, and the most ambiguous thing in current is - whether i have to make proposal for the entire thing, or just for the subproject he suggested me to do so.?

Re: GSoC

2021-04-03 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> If he is ok with that we can do this type of thing it will be like > doing different different subproject under same projects name, and > no collaboration to be done like this as you have mentioned earlier. I think the best solution is that you don't use the term 'subproject' at all.

Re: Proposing a new Idea for Freetype

2021-04-03 Thread Werner LEMBERG
Hello Manish, > Through Community Platform, I meant a Full Stack Forum for the > upcoming contributors or the Developers within where they can > interact with each other. Thanks for your offer, but no. The 'official' communication channels for FreeType are intentionally e-mail only. Having