Re: [ft-devel] Relevance of new API FT_Get_Module_Flags ?

2006-02-22 Thread David Turner
Hi everyone, I just removed FT_Get_Module_Flags, it is now replaced by a new API named FT_Get_TrueType_Engine_Type. documentation is below. I guess It will be part of the next release candidate Regards, - David Turner - The FreeType Project  (www.freetype.org) -- cu

Re: [ft-devel] Relevance of new API FT_Get_Module_Flags ?

2006-02-22 Thread George Williams
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 13:24, Owen Taylor wrote: > On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 21:39 +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > > Could someone tell me the relevance of the new public API named > > > FT_Get_Module_Flags that > > > was introduced in the current CVS ? > > This is OK with me. Owen? > > Wasn't me..

Re: [ft-devel] Relevance of new API FT_Get_Module_Flags ?

2006-02-22 Thread George Williams
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 01:56, david turner wrote: > If this function's purpose is to determine wether the bytecode > interpreter is activated in a given > FreeType build, I'd rather like to see a specific API that returns a > boolean, or an enum, instead Can't you avoid even that by using dlopen(N

[ft-devel] Re: [ft-cvs] freetype2 ./ChangeLog src/sfnt/ttmtx.c

2006-02-22 Thread mpsuzuki
Hi, On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 17:06:35 + David Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >CVSROOT: /cvsroot/freetype >Module name: freetype2 >Branch: >Changes by:David Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>06/02/21 17:06:35 > >Modified files: > . : ChangeLog > src/s

Re: [ft-devel] Outline dumper for windows

2006-02-22 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> This small program can dump the outlines, hinted or unhinted, of > glyphs under windows. It is helpful for identifying whether certain > rendering differences result from the bytecode interpreter or from > the monochrone raster. Very good that you've written that! I've asked for such a progra

Re: [ft-devel] Outline dumper for windows

2006-02-22 Thread Chia-I Wu
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 08:46:12AM +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > Very good that you've written that! I've asked for such a program > years ago. BTW, perhaps you find a better name for this smal > program... On my box, I name it `a.c' :-) > Using FontForge to single-step through the bytecode ins