On Sun, 2007-02-04 at 21:54 +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> > In this new context, I understand that you would want a single license.
> > I'm ok with re-licensing this code under the LGPL,
>
> Me too.
Great, thanks. To make sure, I'm looking for making it LGPL+FTL. Not
LGPL alone. The FTL licen
On Sun, 2007-02-04 at 19:14 +0100, David Turner wrote:
> > The problem is in Pango actually. "Pango has no problem using it" as in
> > no one ever complained about, except recently in Fedora lists. The
> > complaint is that Pango is not LGPLed, because it uses code that is GPL
> > +FTL.
> >
> Ah
> In this new context, I understand that you would want a single license.
> I'm ok with re-licensing this code under the LGPL,
Me too.
Werner
___
Freetype-devel mailing list
Freetype-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/free
> The problem is in Pango actually. "Pango has no problem using it" as in
> no one ever complained about, except recently in Fedora lists. The
> complaint is that Pango is not LGPLed, because it uses code that is GPL
> +FTL.
>
Ah sorry, I imagined that harfbuzz was going to be distributed as a se
On Sun, 2007-02-04 at 18:52 +0100, David Turner wrote:
> Hi Behdad,
>
> On Sat, 03 Feb 2007 11:03:56 -0500, "Behdad Esfahbod" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> > Hi FreeType developers,
> >
> > We have a bit of a problem with the old OpenType Layout code ripped out
> > of FreeType and called HarfBuz
Hi Behdad,
On Sat, 03 Feb 2007 11:03:56 -0500, "Behdad Esfahbod" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hi FreeType developers,
>
> We have a bit of a problem with the old OpenType Layout code ripped out
> of FreeType and called HarfBuzz these days. The problem is that Pango
> is LGPL'ed, while HarfBuzz is
Hi FreeType developers,
We have a bit of a problem with the old OpenType Layout code ripped out
of FreeType and called HarfBuzz these days. The problem is that Pango
is LGPL'ed, while HarfBuzz is GPL+FTL. The two do not quite match. Are
the FreeType developers willing to do one of the following
