On 01/12/2010 10:06, Adam Charrett wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Maciej Urbaniak wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> What is the final release date for 1.x final? From what I remember it was
>> supposed to be on 28.11. Reason I
>> ask is that I opened a bug for imdb plugin not working. I have a fix but
>> will
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, Maciej Urbaniak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What is the final release date for 1.x final? From what I remember it was
> supposed to be on 28.11. Reason I
> ask is that I opened a bug for imdb plugin not working. I have a fix but will
> not be ready for at least
> couple of days. Code
Hi,
What is the final release date for 1.x final? From what I remember it was
supposed to be on 28.11. Reason I
ask is that I opened a bug for imdb plugin not working. I have a fix but will
not be ready for at least
couple of days. Code is pretty much 100% but I still need to update the docs,
m
I imagine that it means screen shot showing your plugin in action.
James Trietsch wrote:
>- Original Message
>
>> From: John Molohan
>> To: freevo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Sent: Sun, November 7, 2010 4:33:00 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Freevo-devel] Fr
On 08/11/2010 05:39, James Trietsch wrote:
- Original Message
From: John Molohan
To: freevo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Sun, November 7, 2010 4:33:00 AM
Subject: Re: [Freevo-devel] Freevo 1.x final feature release schedule
And a plugin image if appropriate.
Uh oh.
Nothing to
- Original Message
> From: John Molohan
> To: freevo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Sent: Sun, November 7, 2010 4:33:00 AM
> Subject: Re: [Freevo-devel] Freevo 1.x final feature release schedule
>
> And a plugin image if appropriate.
Uh oh. I do have two 'new&
On 07/11/2010 08:29, Adam Charrett wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 16:32 -0700, James Trietsch wrote:
>> Thanks Dischi and Evan for the advice. I'm gonna start packing up the 'easy'
>> things that don't interfere with each other. I'm not sure any of my code
>> patches-on-patches, but I've seen at le
On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 16:32 -0700, James Trietsch wrote:
> Thanks Dischi and Evan for the advice. I'm gonna start packing up the 'easy'
> things that don't interfere with each other. I'm not sure any of my code
> patches-on-patches, but I've seen at least one instance where two patches add
> on
Thanks Dischi and Evan for the advice. I'm gonna start packing up the 'easy'
things that don't interfere with each other. I'm not sure any of my code
patches-on-patches, but I've seen at least one instance where two patches add
on
code to the same file in succession. That is, the code looks lik
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 3:01 AM, Dirk Meyer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 05.11.2010 20:21, James Trietsch wrote:
>> I'm afraid that if I delete part of a diff file, it will throw off the line
>> number references in other parts and the patch will fail. And if the
>> patching is
>> dependent on line number
Hi,
On 05.11.2010 20:21, James Trietsch wrote:
> I'm afraid that if I delete part of a diff file, it will throw off the line
> number references in other parts and the patch will fail. And if the patching
> is
> dependent on line numbers, would that mean even if I could break them up,
> they'
- Original Message
> From: Adam Charrett
> To: freevo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Sent: Wed, October 27, 2010 4:41:46 AM
> Subject: [Freevo-devel] Freevo 1.x final feature release schedule
>
> With this in mind the closing date for enhancement is Sunday 14th
>
Hey Adam,
On 27.10.2010 13:41, Adam Charrett wrote:
> I'm planning to make a final feature release candidate of Freevo 1.x on
> the 28th November 2010.
Can we do anything to get the OSD changes we made as default? :)
Henne
--
Henne Vogelsang, http://hennevogel.de
"To die. In the rain. Al
On 28/10/2010 16:36, Stephen Rowles wrote:
> On 27/10/2010 21:35, John Molohan wrote:
>> I did want to redesign the web remote to make it look a bit more native
>> when used on a phone which is the most likely use case. I'll just have
>> to try find a few precious free minutes :). I think it's wort
On 27/10/2010 21:35, John Molohan wrote:
> I did want to redesign the web remote to make it look a bit more native
> when used on a phone which is the most likely use case. I'll just have
> to try find a few precious free minutes :). I think it's worth it unless
> someone can whip up a native andro
On 27/10/2010 12:41, Adam Charrett wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm planning to make a final feature release candidate of Freevo 1.x on
> the 28th November 2010.
>
> It's been almost a year and a half since the last release and lots of new
> features and bug fixes have gone in to this release. But, in orde
Hi All,
I'm planning to make a final feature release candidate of Freevo 1.x on
the 28th November 2010.
It's been almost a year and a half since the last release and lots of new
features and bug fixes have gone in to this release. But, in order to move
development effort on to Freevo 2, this will
17 matches
Mail list logo