Dan Sully wrote:
> * Jason Tackaberry shaped the electrons to say...
>
>> On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 08:23 -0700, Dan Sully wrote:
>>> And after investigation, trac requires being installed on the svn server.
>> I did notice that Duncan's demo install of trac seemed to have svn
>> integration but it's
Jason Tackaberry wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 08:30 +0100, Duncan Webb wrote:
>> The tracker at python.org looks good and this is
>> http://roundup.sourceforge.net/
>
> I'll take a look, thanks.
>
> I agree bugzilla is messy, but it can be slimmed down, and it has the
> benefit that it's quite
* Jason Tackaberry shaped the electrons to say...
>On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 08:23 -0700, Dan Sully wrote:
>> And after investigation, trac requires being installed on the svn server.
>
>I did notice that Duncan's demo install of trac seemed to have svn
>integration but it's clearly not on the svn ser
On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 08:23 -0700, Dan Sully wrote:
> And after investigation, trac requires being installed on the svn server.
I did notice that Duncan's demo install of trac seemed to have svn
integration but it's clearly not on the svn server. So I wondered if a
local checkout (that synced eve
* Dirk Meyer shaped the electrons to say...
>>> worth using and I think it is. I like the milestones and timeline and
>>> the tracker looks not bad. If you have time take and have a play ;-)
>>
>> What I don't like about trac is how it looks like it tries to takeover
>> the project website. How w
Jason Tackaberry wrote:
>> worth using and I think it is. I like the milestones and timeline and
>> the tracker looks not bad. If you have time take and have a play ;-)
>
> What I don't like about trac is how it looks like it tries to takeover
> the project website. How well can it be integrated?
On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 08:30 +0100, Duncan Webb wrote:
> The tracker at python.org looks good and this is
> http://roundup.sourceforge.net/
I'll take a look, thanks.
I agree bugzilla is messy, but it can be slimmed down, and it has the
benefit that it's quite common in the opensource world, so man
Jason Tackaberry said the following, on 09.03.2008 16:32:
> On Sun, 2008-03-09 at 15:29 +0100, Duncan Webb wrote:
>> And I prefer the tracker for Freevo-1 related bugs and features.
>
> If we setup a bugzilla instance on freevo.org, would you be interested
> in using it? It might be nice to have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Duncan Webb wrote:
> Andrew Jeffery wrote:
>> I submitted this patchset to the feature request tracker about a week
>> ago (
>> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1907065&group_id=46652&atid=446898
>> ) but still haven't heard any
On Sun, 2008-03-09 at 15:29 +0100, Duncan Webb wrote:
> And I prefer the tracker for Freevo-1 related bugs and features.
If we setup a bugzilla instance on freevo.org, would you be interested
in using it? It might be nice to have a unified source.
--
Jason Tackaberry wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-03-09 at 14:40 +1030, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
>> [...] but still haven't heard anything about it, so here it is again in
>> case it got missed
>
> Yes, I don't follow the sourceforge tracker,
This one went across boundaries a bit, but you should look at the
On Sun, 2008-03-09 at 14:40 +1030, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> [...] but still haven't heard anything about it, so here it is again in
> case it got missed
Yes, I don't follow the sourceforge tracker, so submitting patches as
you did here is preferred (at least by me).
I have merged your kaa.metadata
Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> I submitted this patchset to the feature request tracker about a week
> ago (
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1907065&group_id=46652&atid=446898
> ) but still haven't heard anything about it, so here it is again in
> case it got missed
No it didn'
13 matches
Mail list logo
