Steve:
Thanks for your insights, especially your characterization the Tea Party
are demanding
entitlements for themselves while demanding cutting them for others.
I have considered
their motto to be We got ours, devil take the hindmost. More pointed
I consider them
to be dogs-in-the-manger
Steve:
Also more insights, thanks. I consider the 11 Nations as a model. With
all models there
are abstractions in order to make it manageable to gain insights of the
domain. Mr. Woodard's
model is very rich as models go - certainly more so than the binary
scales you point out have
become
StephT -
Thanks for more insight into your perspective, including your politics
and demographic embedding. I appreciate your thoughts about models in
this context.
What I think I appreciated most about Woodard's model was it's richness
as you call it, but that it seemed to have *little* if
I'd forgotten, but
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/10/public-editor/sullivan-lessons-in-a-surveillance-drama-redux.html?src=recg
the
NYTimes had evidence of warrantless wiretapping by the first Dubya
administration and was persuaded to sit on the story until after Bush was
reelected. Which is why
Steve:
Ouch. Its uncomfortable when you hold up a description of Americaby
making us look in the mirror.
Ol' Pogo was right. (We have met the enemy and he is ...). Rant away,
my good man.
You have thought deeper on this than I have. My attraction to the 11
Nations Model is its
ST -
Ouch. Its uncomfortable when you hold up a description of
Americaby making us look in the mirror.
Ol' Pogo was right. (We have met the enemy and he is ...). Rant away,
my good man.
You are welcome ;^)!
You have thought deeper on this than I have. My attraction to the 11
*Old email:*
What a great cascade here... I'm not sure anyone but you and I are
properly enjoying it however grin.
The delete key suffices. And, in the spirit of hiding in plain sight, we
have to populate caches like Arlo's with _something_ to lower the SNR.
Personally, I feel successful
