Re: [FRIAM] ChatGPT and William James

I watched the developer video on GPT-4 that came out today. Now it can incorporate feedback after training. They showed an example of code it wrote based on training from 2021 and then gave it feedback from the Python error messages and new APIs and documentation and it self-corrected to

Re: [FRIAM] ChatGPT and William James

It's in their interest to invest in explainable AI (a.k.a. "ethical" AI), if only to hone their engineering skills and improve the product. If they play their cards right, they could really do some damage to Google. -Original Message- From: Friam On Behalf Of glen Sent: Tuesday, March

Re: [FRIAM] ChatGPT and William James

We had a conversation with some MS guy the other day who claimed secret "front end" buildouts for GPT backends that cover more and refine existing APIs. I suspect some of his secrecy was driven by the fact that he's a bit old and prolly doesn't really understand what those crazy kids are

Re: [FRIAM] ChatGPT and William James

Yeah, well I’m buying more Microsoft stock. From: Friam On Behalf Of Roger Critchlow Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2023 11:11 AM To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group Subject: Re: [FRIAM] ChatGPT and William James This was good, too:

Re: [FRIAM] ChatGPT and William James

This was good, too: https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/ai-artificial-intelligence-chatbots-emily-m-bender.html And microsoft laid off its responsible AI team: https://www.platformer.news/p/microsoft-just-laid-off-one-of-its And your Ring doorbell has just been taken hostage for ransom

Re: [FRIAM] ChatGPT and William James

[switching to keyboard] “Posit hypothesis” is just a fancy way of saying “Predicting what happens under some circumstances.” And that’s exactly what GPT does.Look at the GPT-4 Cinderella example. Clearly it can chain together fragments. From: Friam On Behalf Of Marcus Daniels Sent:

Re: [FRIAM] ChatGPT and William James

Not buying it. On Mar 14, 2023, at 10:58 AM, Barry MacKichan wrote:  I haven’t followed the discussions here carefully, but the question “And we humans are different?” brings up Noam Chomsky’s view in the NYT, gifted here:

Re: [FRIAM] ChatGPT and William James

I haven’t followed the discussions here carefully, but the question “And we humans are different?” brings up Noam Chomsky’s view in the NYT, gifted here:

[FRIAM] looks pretty awesome to me

[GPT-4-cover.png] GPT-4 openai.com Sent from my iPhone -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns