, March 27, 2010 2:54 PM
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Sperm pelotons; article in Nature
Hugh,
Very interesting model! One of my doctoral adviser's, Jeffrey Schank has
demonstrated repeatedly that scientists are very bad at predicting what
'chance' looks like when trying to do experiments involving
@redfish.com
*Sent:* Saturday, March 27, 2010 2:54 PM
*Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] Sperm pelotons; article in Nature
Hugh,
Very interesting model! One of my doctoral adviser's, Jeffrey Schank has
demonstrated repeatedly that scientists are very bad at predicting what
'chance' looks like when trying
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Sperm pelotons; article in Nature
Thanks Eric for taking the time to look through my post. For Nick's last post,
I am not entirely sure what a genefur is, although it sounds like it is a
reference to an inherent genetic trait, as you also discuss.
Yes, I agree it will help
://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/
http://www.cusf.org [City University of Santa Fe]
- Original Message -
From: Douglas Roberts
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Sent: 3/29/2010 9:48:32 AM
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Sperm pelotons; article in Nature
Does
, March 27, 2010 2:54 PM
*Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] Sperm pelotons; article in Nature
Hugh,
Very interesting model! One of my doctoral adviser's, Jeffrey Schank has
demonstrated repeatedly that scientists are very bad at predicting what
'chance' looks like when trying to do experiments involving
-
*From:* ERIC P. CHARLES e...@psu.edu
*To:* Nicholas Thompson nickthomp...@earthlink.net
*Cc:* Hugh Trenchard htrench...@shaw.ca ; friam@redfish.com
*Sent:* Saturday, March 27, 2010 2:54 PM
*Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] Sperm pelotons; article in Nature
Hugh,
Very interesting model! One of my
= href=#Nicholas
Thompson/a
Cc: a title= href=#friam@redfish.com/a
Sent: 3/29/2010 9:42:09 AM
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Sperm pelotons; article in Nature
Thanks Eric for taking the time to look through my post. For Nick's last
post, I am not entirely sure what a genefur is, although it sounds
Nick -
Doug,
Clearly you have never looked closely
at Sperm under a microscope.
That is not what his middle school science teacher told me!
- Steve
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays
This man is a treasure. Yeah, you, Doug.
On Mar 29, 2010, at 2:30 PM, Douglas Roberts wrote:
Gentlemen,
It was certainly not my intention to hijack this thread...
--Doug
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Steve Smith sasm...@swcp.com
wrote:
Nick -
Doug,
Clearly you have never looked
-Original Message-
From: friam-boun...@redfish.com [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf
Of Hugh Trenchard
Sent: March 29, 2010 10:42 AM
To: ERIC P. CHARLES; Nicholas Thompson
Cc: friam@redfish.com
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Sperm pelotons; article in Nature
Thanks Eric for taking the time
P. CHARLES
To: Nicholas Thompson
Cc: Hugh Trenchard; Friam@redfish.com
Sent: 3/29/2010 11:13:31 AM
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Sperm pelotons; article in Nature
But Nick,
Hugh's point is that we DO NOT need trait-group selection to explain the
clustering sperm. We merely need sperm to swim
, March 29, 2010 10:13 AM
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Sperm pelotons; article in Nature
But Nick,
Hugh's point is that we DO NOT need trait-group selection to explain the
clustering sperm. We merely need sperm to swim in the same direction, AND have
a variety of abilities. Given that alone, Hugh
://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/
http://www.cusf.org [City University of Santa Fe]
- Original Message -
From: Hugh Trenchard
To: ERIC P. CHARLES;Nicholas Thompson
Cc: Friam@redfish.com
Sent: 3/29/2010 4:58:42 PM
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Sperm pelotons; article in Nature
Practically my philosophy of life.
No coincidence that Wally (Dilbert comic strip) is my main hero.
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Vladimyr Ivan Burachynsky
vbur...@shaw.cawrote:
The cunning riders peel off very quickly and work themselves back into
the pack and try and hang in but out of
- Original Message -
From: Nicholas Thompson nickthomp...@earthlink.net
To: friam@redfish.com
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 8:04 PM
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Sperm pelotons; article in Nature
This is fun to think about. Hopefully, REC will help me:
Is there a paradox here. let
...@shaw.ca
To: nickthomp...@earthlink.net; The Friday Morning Applied Complexity
Coffee Group friam@redfish.com
Date: 3/27/2010 10:54:41 AM
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Sperm pelotons; article in Nature
Thanks for taking a peek at my post. Great questions, and they help me to
see how/where my
To: nickthomp...@earthlink.net; The Friday Morning Applied
Complexity
Coffee Group friam@redfish.com
Date: 3/27/2010 10:54:41 AM
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Sperm pelotons; article in Nature
Thanks for taking a peek at my post. Great questions, and they help me to
see how/where my descriptions can
/27/2010 3:54:23 PM
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Sperm pelotons; article in Nature
Hugh,
Very interesting model! One of my doctoral adviser's, Jeffrey Schank has
demonstrated repeatedly that scientists are very bad at predicting what
'chance' looks like when trying to do experiments involving
On February 12, Roger Critchlow posted a reference to sperm pelotons,
which inspired me to read the Nature article and to think a bit about how
principles of peloton interactions could be applied to sperm aggregations.
I've outlined some thoughts below.
://www.cusf.org [City University of Santa Fe]
[Original Message]
From: Hugh Trenchard htrench...@shaw.ca
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group friam@redfish.com
Date: 3/26/2010 8:38:22 PM
Subject: [FRIAM] Sperm pelotons; article in Nature
On February 12, Roger Critchlow
20 matches
Mail list logo
