The ball is in Apple's court. Do they have the moxie to come up with a
creative reply?
http://www.tcgeeks.com/this-is-a-real-war-samsung-pays-apple-1-billion-sendi
ng-30-trucks-full-of-5-cent-coins/
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2012/aug/29/apple-samsung-trucks-nickels-fake
Cody Smith
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Jack Stafurik jstafu...@earthlink.netwrote:
The ball is in Apple's court. Do they have the moxie to come up with a
creative reply?
Yes the answer is that news story needs to be clarified as: attempted to do
so.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2012/aug/29/apple-samsung-trucks-nickels-fake
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Jack Stafurik jstafu...@earthlink.netwrote:
The ball is in Apple's court. Do they have the
I liked this:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2012/aug/28/apple-samsung-foreman-explains
.. in the blog roll to the right of the article.
Explains in detail how the jury worked and made the decision.
Patents are tough. I got a couple for software, mainly relating to the
fine old NeWS
I had a feeling the topic of samsung would come up again. To my untrained
eyes how Android looks on my Samsung Glaxy S4-when held next to a iphone-
on the look and feel front don't (to me) look so simmiler that I'd pick up
my samsung and mistake it for a iphone. So it comes down to fair and
The killer with software patents is that to contest a patent infringement suit
is at least a $1 million. That means that trolls can sue anyone as long as
their case looks remotely plausible to an non-techie judge, and as long as the
back-royalties are less than a million, the sued party has to
This is worth watching again:
http://www.ted.com/talks/drew_curtis_how_i_beat_a_patent_troll.html
Thanks
Robert C
On 7/9/13 12:34 PM, Barry MacKichan wrote:
The killer with software patents is that to contest a patent
infringement suit is at least a $1 million. That means that trolls can
sue
