Re: [FRIAM] online privacy (again)

2012-04-04 Thread Sarbajit Roy
PM To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group Subject: Re: [FRIAM] online privacy (again) Option 1, use the network more (throw out chaff), won't work, unless you are very sophisticated about the chaff you produce. Normal unecrypted communications are easy to filter and sort

Re: [FRIAM] online privacy (again)

2012-04-04 Thread Nicholas Thompson
knew I was a Good Man. Nick -Original Message- From: friam-boun...@redfish.com [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf Of glen Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 11:54 AM To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group Subject: Re: [FRIAM] online privacy (again

Re: [FRIAM] online privacy (again)

2012-04-04 Thread Arlo Barnes
I actually have not turned off such a switch. This is not because I am lazy or because I do not care about matters of privacy - on the contrary, I care a great deal that people have the law-guaranteed right to create, reveal, own, and trade/barter/buy/sell as much or as little data about or by

Re: [FRIAM] online privacy (again)

2012-04-03 Thread glen
ERIC P. CHARLES wrote at 04/02/2012 12:08 PM: What is there to resist? What would such resistance accomplish? Your options are to not care and go about your business as before, to learn to talk in some sophisticated code, or to stop using the square. What else is there? There are at least 2

Re: [FRIAM] online privacy (again)

2012-04-03 Thread James Steiner
Whoops, sorry glen, I didn't read to the end of your post, missed the *. I said what you already said. Sorry. ~~James On Apr 3, 2012 10:06 PM, James Steiner gregortr...@gmail.com wrote: Option 1, use the network more (throw out chaff), won't work, unless you are very sophisticated about the

[FRIAM] online privacy (again)

2012-04-02 Thread Nicholas Thompson
Hi, everybody, Did you see this odd, avuncular op-ed from the Federal Trade Commission? I don't know whether it reassured me more than it scared the living bejeesus out of me. Big-Brother's Big Brother is looking out for you. I take it back about contempt: If one of you would

Re: [FRIAM] online privacy (again)

2012-04-02 Thread Douglas Roberts
:* friam-boun...@redfish.com [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] *On Behalf Of *Douglas Roberts *Sent:* Monday, April 02, 2012 10:02 AM *To:* The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group *Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] online privacy (again) ** ** Some forms of ignorance and/or stupidity

Re: [FRIAM] online privacy (again)

2012-04-02 Thread Robert Lancaster
-boun...@redfish.com [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf Of Douglas Roberts Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 10:02 AM To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group Subject: Re: [FRIAM] online privacy (again) Some forms of ignorance and/or stupidity are worthy, nay, richly

Re: [FRIAM] online privacy (again)

2012-04-02 Thread ERIC P. CHARLES
Roberts Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 10:02 AM To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group Subject: Re: [FRIAM] online privacy (again) Some forms of ignorance and/or stupidity are worthy, nay, richly deserving of contempt. And disparagement. We have, IMO, a societal