Re: [FRIAM] Object-Oriented Ontology

2018-11-15 Thread Nick Thompson
Glen, Good luck with this. I fear I have failed you. Even though I have bought two copies of the book and read it once, I cannot seem to free up the time (or the priorities) to make it a focus of attention. I don't sense that the Local Church has much interest in it, although I am not sure

Re: [FRIAM] Object Oriented Ontology

2018-07-05 Thread Frank Wimberly
e you “in country” or did we lose you to Europe? > Have you become a Eurokid? Are you reading Lacan and sipping espresso in > the shade of the plane trees *en la Place de la Sorbonne.* > > > > Great to be in touch! > > > > Nick > > > > *Who am I to cast the first

Re: [FRIAM] Object Oriented Ontology

2018-07-05 Thread Prof David West
> > *Who am I to cast the first stone, Owen? > > > Nicholas S. Thompson > Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Biology > Clark University > http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/ > > *From:* Friam [mailto:friam-boun...@

Re: [FRIAM] Object Oriented Ontology

2018-07-05 Thread Patrick Reilly
gt; Reilly > *Sent:* Thursday, July 05, 2018 1:37 PM > *To:* The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group < > friam@redfish.com> > *Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] Object Oriented Ontology > > > > I bought a copy. For real. > > On Thursday, July 5, 2018, uǝlƃ ☣ wrote:

Re: [FRIAM] Object Oriented Ontology

2018-07-05 Thread Nick Thompson
net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/> http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/ From: Friam [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf Of Patrick Reilly Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2018 1:37 PM To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Object Or

Re: [FRIAM] Object Oriented Ontology

2018-07-05 Thread Patrick Reilly
I bought a copy. For real. On Thursday, July 5, 2018, uǝlƃ ☣ wrote: > I realize I'm that tool who always invites himself to these parties. But > I'm intrigued enough to read along with you. At first I was skeptical > because of this: > > https://philpapers.org/archive/BLAMSR.pdf > > Harman's

Re: [FRIAM] Object Oriented Ontology

2018-07-05 Thread uǝlƃ ☣
I realize I'm that tool who always invites himself to these parties. But I'm intrigued enough to read along with you. At first I was skeptical because of this: https://philpapers.org/archive/BLAMSR.pdf > Harman's objectal reduction is an apodictic posit, invulnerable to empirical > testing.

Re: [FRIAM] Object Oriented Ontology

2018-07-05 Thread Nick Thompson
ursday, July 05, 2018 2:59 AM To: friam@redfish.com Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Object Oriented Ontology Nick Twas I that brought the book to your attention and I have read it twice and am using it as a foundation for writing a chapter in my Natural Systems Design book. Happy to discuss and p

Re: [FRIAM] Object Oriented Ontology

2018-07-05 Thread Prof David West
Nick Twas I that brought the book to your attention and I have read it twice and am using it as a foundation for writing a chapter in my Natural Systems Design book. Happy to discuss and perhaps answer some of your questions and help you find the path through the forest. davew On Wed, Jul 4,