On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 9:51 PM, Bill Page bill.p...@newsynthesis.orgwrote:
Are there other systems similar in some way to FriCAS that already use
LLVM?
I have no knowledge about any CAS using LLVM. However there're some serious
players in industry and open source that use LLVM. They're
Hi Krystian,
On 11/03/14 09:36, Krystian Bacławski wrote: Anything you can do to limit
FriCAS library dependencies on BOOT and
Lisp code would be a win in long term. If we eventually decide to move
away from Common Lisp as runtime environment, every function we use from
CL library will
On 11 March 2014 05:46, Krystian Bacławski krystian.baclaw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 9:51 PM, Bill Page bill.p...@newsynthesis.org
wrote:
Are there other systems similar in some way to FriCAS that already use
LLVM?
I have no knowledge about any CAS using LLVM. However
On 11/03/14 13:55, Bill Page wrote:
I'm not in the position to drive the changes in type system of SPAD /
Aldor.
I consider myself to be only a beginner. However - having experience with
couple other languages like C++, Python, Ocaml, Haskell I see what could
be
added to the type system to
Martin Baker wrote:
I have come across (and occasionally used myself) Lisp calls such as:
sayTeX$Lisp hello
mathObject2String$Lisp
ATOM(expr)$Lisp break down an expression into atoms
trapNumericErrors myTrap1(ff:DF- DF, f:DF):DF ==
s := trapNumericErrors(ff(f))$Lisp ::
I have noticed that FriCAS nopile mode currently has different
behaviour with respect to braces than most other languages
using braces: nopile mode requires semicolon after closing
brace and effectively disallows semicolon just before
closing brace. I am thinking about changing this.
ATM I do not
