On 03/26/2014 03:05 AM, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
outputTran contains something like this...
VECP x = outputTran ['BRACKET,['AGGLST,:[x.i for i in 0..MAXINDEX
x]]]
In order to translate that into spad I need to be able to deal
with arrays in OutputForm.
I would
I find
[op,:l]:= flattenOps x
--needed since op is string in some spad code
if STRINGP op then (op := INTERN op; x:= [op,:l])
and a bit later
op is [$elt,targ,fun] or not $InteractiveMode and op is
[elt,targ,fun] =
and
x is [-,a,b] =
How can the last expression ever become true if
While in the definition of outputTran I can understand something like this:
x is ['construct,:l] =
['BRACKET,['AGGLST,:[outputTran y for y in l]]]
I don't understand why
x is ['LIST,:l] = outputTran ['BRACKET,['AGGLST,:l]]
is doing any useful recursive application of
Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
On 03/26/2014 03:05 AM, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
outputTran contains something like this...
VECP x = outputTran ['BRACKET,['AGGLST,:[x.i for i in 0..MAXINDEX
x]]]
In order to translate that into spad I need to be able to deal
with
Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
While in the definition of outputTran I can understand something like this:
x is ['construct,:l] =
['BRACKET,['AGGLST,:[outputTran y for y in l]]]
I don't understand why
x is ['LIST,:l] = outputTran ['BRACKET,['AGGLST,:l]]
is doing any
Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
I find
[op,:l]:= flattenOps x
--needed since op is string in some spad code
if STRINGP op then (op := INTERN op; x:= [op,:l])
and a bit later
op is [$elt,targ,fun] or not $InteractiveMode and op is
[elt,targ,fun] =
and
x is [-,a,b] =
How can
More info about this:
On 03/26/2014 03:05 AM, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
outputTran contains something like this...
VECP x = outputTran ['BRACKET,['AGGLST,:[x.i for i in 0..MAXINDEX
x]]]
In order to translate that into spad I need to be able to deal
with
I wrote:
One more thing releated to this: outputTran has special case
for handling Lisp representationof matrices in 'outputTranMatrix'.
But this code can not work, because we use different representation
of matrices (true 2D arrays instead of vectors of vectors).
Actually, I was wrong:
On 03/26/2014 05:13 PM, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
I wrote:
One more thing releated to this: outputTran has special case
for handling Lisp representationof matrices in 'outputTranMatrix'.
But this code can not work, because we use different representation
of matrices (true 2D arrays instead of
I see
NUMBERP x =
MINUSP x = [-,MINUS x]
I would actually want to replace that with
sex == x pretend SExpression
integer? sex = - ((integer x)::OutputForm)
float? sex = - ((float x)::OutputForm)
but the Lisp NUMBERP is more general.
Can I assume that we only have integers and
Hi Waldek,
sorry for bothering you so much with this i-output stuff, but
I am a bit concerned with type dependencies.
If I replace certain boot/lisp functions with SPAD equivalents, how
high in the type hierarchy am I supposed to go?
I don't want to introduce unnecessary type dependencies, and
On 03/26/2014 05:13 PM, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
I wrote:
One more thing releated to this: outputTran has special case
for handling Lisp representationof matrices in 'outputTranMatrix'.
But this code can not work, because we use different representation
of matrices (true 2D arrays
Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
I see
NUMBERP x =
MINUSP x = [-,MINUS x]
I would actually want to replace that with
sex == x pretend SExpression
integer? sex = - ((integer x)::OutputForm)
float? sex = - ((float x)::OutputForm)
but the Lisp NUMBERP is more general.
Can I
On 26 March 2014 06:08, François Poulain fpoul...@metrodore.fr wrote:
Hi Bill,
Le Mon, 24 Mar 2014 11:40:06 -0400,
Bill Page bill.p...@newsynthesis.org a écrit :
The following patch is based on similar coding in mupad-input.scm It
encodes all TeXmacs symbols as FriCAS identifiers by
14 matches
Mail list logo
