Bill Page wrote:
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
?In unlikely case that your changes have no bugs the next person
changing this code is likely to break it: it is really tricky to get
operators correct without simple scheme which is correct by
design.
Clearly I
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
Bill Page wrote:
Martin Rubey wrote:
I would also like to see the rudimentary test file I sent to go with
this patch. ?One remark: as you probably know, I'm strongly in favour of
having InputForm keep all type information. ?I tried
Bill Page wrote:
Martin Rubey wrote:
I would also like to see the rudimentary test file I sent to go with
this patch. ?One remark: as you probably know, I'm strongly in favour of
having InputForm keep all type information. ?I tried to prepare such a
patch, but there is a small problem
Martin Rubey wrote:
I would also like to see the rudimentary test file I sent to go with
this patch. One remark: as you probably know, I'm strongly in favour of
having InputForm keep all type information. I tried to prepare such a
patch, but there is a small problem in the way the
Martin Rubey wrote:
I would also like to see the rudimentary test file I sent to go with
this patch. One remark: as you probably know, I'm strongly in favour of
having InputForm keep all type information. I tried to prepare such a
patch, but there is a small problem in the way the
Bill Page bill.p...@newsynthesis.org writes:
The next patch shown in 'svn status' above contains the changes to
InputForm and unparse I have discussed with Martin Rubey for product
and summation.
+if F has ConvertibleTo(I) then
+ indprod l ==
+
Waldek,
Thank you for your testing and comments about 'algebra-comparable-1.patch'
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
The algebra-comparable-1.patch mostly looks OK. However I have
doubts about the followig hunk:
Index: src/algebra/variable.spad.pamphlet
Bill Page wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
The algebra-comparable-1.patch mostly looks OK. ?However I have
doubts about the followig hunk:
Index: src/algebra/variable.spad.pamphlet
===
Waldek,
Thanks for the example of where the ordering of an OrderedVariableList
is important in the library.
As I said, I will commit the code for comparable without this change.
But I will be traveling for the next few days and may not be able to
do the commit until some time next week.
On Thu,
Bill Page wrote:
Waldek,
Attached and below is the patch rebased to revision 730 that adds
Comparable to the XPOLY and Tensor domains (and others that depend on
FreeModuleCategory). Among other things this change permits these
domains to participate with domains like Expression again,
Waldek,
Attached and below is the patch rebased to revision 730 that adds
Comparable to the XPOLY and Tensor domains (and others that depend on
FreeModuleCategory). Among other things this change permits these
domains to participate with domains like Expression again, although
there are some
11 matches
Mail list logo
