> At first glance I can not see if it is wrong or not: it depends
> on intent of original writer. I suspect that the intention was
> to use this code only for sparse sets.
See the patch that changes Rep of BinaryTree in the other
thread, I think the intention here was for this BinaryTree case,
oldk1331 wrote:
> https://github.com/oldk1331/fricas/commit/391150ca162af518b8adce509997757fbaacba54.patch
>
> this patch fixes code related to BasicType:
>
> = (equality operator) and functions that only relies on = requires
> S has BasicType, not SetCategory.
Actually, we can compute equality
https://github.com/oldk1331/fricas/commit/391150ca162af518b8adce509997757fbaacba54.patch
this patch fixes code related to BasicType:
= (equality operator) and functions that only relies on = requires
S has BasicType, not SetCategory.
In BinaryRecursiveAggregate, "has SetAggregate(S)" is totally
