Re: [fricas-devel] "title" and "frame" in PostScript output

2024-04-16 Thread Waldek Hebisch
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 07:34:24AM +0800, Qian Yun wrote: > It is definitely possible to control the inclusion, but that means > adding another global variable. Because it also affects the size of > BoundingBox. I would not worry to much about global variable. I mean, there are several of them

Re: [fricas-devel] "title" and "frame" in PostScript output

2024-04-15 Thread Qian Yun
It is definitely possible to control the inclusion, but that means adding another global variable. Because it also affects the size of BoundingBox. Since this "title and frame" is not there for the past decades, I think we can start freshly by choosing "title inside viewWindow and no frame"? -

Re: [fricas-devel] "title" and "frame" in PostScript output

2024-04-15 Thread Waldek Hebisch
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 10:45:57PM +0800, Qian Yun wrote: > By default, there's no "title" in PostScript output. > > Simply enable "Gdraws_drawFrame" in src/graph/Gdraws/Gfun.c > will give you "title" back, along with "frame" (thin lines) > around titleWindow and viewWindow. > > That's a

Re: [fricas-devel] "title" and "frame" in PostScript output

2024-04-15 Thread Ralf Hemmecke
My point is, should we try to make the PS format and xpm format look the same? In general, I would say yes. On the other hand what part of FriCAS is using the xpm format? If it is only HyperDoc, then I donĀ“t care as I do not care much about HyperDoc at all. It is good as it is, but otherwise

[fricas-devel] "title" and "frame" in PostScript output

2024-04-15 Thread Qian Yun
By default, there's no "title" in PostScript output. Simply enable "Gdraws_drawFrame" in src/graph/Gdraws/Gfun.c will give you "title" back, along with "frame" (thin lines) around titleWindow and viewWindow. That's a discrepancy with the xpm format. Also the position of "title" in PS format is