so you combined wireshark and ettercap. nice job.
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 11:22 PM, inter inter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[0x4553-Intercepter] offers the following features:
+ Sniffing passwords\hashes of the types:
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 9:27 AM, Gadi Evron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.ciaonet.org/journals/gjia/v9i1/699.pdfIt is not
technical, I hope you find it useful.
Gadi Evron.
Have you ever posted anything technical? Are you capable of doing anything
useful?
Hope you the best in
why don't you code it yourself instead of being a script kiddie faggot. and
don't use ;-) to look cool when you beg for warez.
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 10:13 AM, bob harley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone have a copy of
rsa.2048.tar.bzip2http://www.deadbeef.de/rsa.2048.tar.bzip2?
The web
Could you never write perl again please? Perl underground should take a shot
at your stuff but you are not worth it.
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 1:35 AM, Markus Müller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi full-disclosure,
the debian openssl issue leads that there are only 65.536 possible ssh
keys
why are companies like this allowed to exist? Their employee ( Bob McGuire,
Director ) openly admits ( see previously emails with Robert, DonB, and I )
that his company participates in FUD and scare tactics. They have no
apparent talent and use 'vulnerability scanners' and 'security tools' and
Where is secreview when you actually need them? After the useless thread
about gmail blah blah I decided to check out http://www.secnap.com/ and all
I can say is WHAT THE FUCK.
The first lines of their website:
The Internet comes with built in threats from hackers, industrial
Espionage, spyware
.1961
http://www.spammertrap.com/
SpammerTrap – Everything Channel Hot Product of 2008
SECNAP Voted Hot Company of 2008 at Technosium Summit
www.technosium.com/hotcompanies/
-Original Message-
From: reepex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sat 5/10/2008 3:13 PM
To: Michael Scheidell
I scratched my reply to this mail because don's reply was much better
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 10:33 PM, Robert McGuire [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I don't believe remaining anonymous invalidates comments, just seems
unnecessary, much like FUD.
Can't argue with reepex, FUD is unnecessary
comments, just seems
unnecessary, much like FUD.
|
| Can't argue with reepex, FUD is unnecessary and utterly transparent so
you have to wonder why every company in the industry perpetuates it.
It's counterproductive in fact, makes my job more difficult so were it
up to me it wouldn't be a part
and what do you do outside of FD? apply windows updates and push norton AV
updates to clients?
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 11:19 AM, Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--On May 9, 2008 9:37:12 PM -0700 Professor Micheal Chatner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You probably don't even have a CISSP.
Once again zf0 shows they cannot hack anyone worthwhile. cDc, robert lemos,
and anonymous? Could you have picked any bigger script kiddies?
and no one gives a fuck about your pwnie awards.
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 7:11 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I, Robert Lemos (see robertlemos.com, I need
no one cares what a CISSP has to say
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 9:44 PM, John C. A. Bambenek, GCIH, CISSP
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored
you are a retard.
its for live memory analysis on a running machine. not anything like a
bootable Live Cd.
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 8:41 PM, Peter Besenbruch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 29 April 2008 14:31:18 Ivan . wrote:
you reply to everyone else but skip my email about your botnet? I guess that
means its up and running well?
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 6:49 PM, I)ruid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 14:40 -0700, Andrew A wrote:
Stop lying to everyone. Caughq.org got owned and rm'd. Looks like
at least you wouldn't have to remove trojans and tracking cookies off your
customer's machines then
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 11:39 PM, Micheal Cottingham
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Indeed. There is no such thing as secure. Security is a process, one
that never ends. If it did, many of us would
how is the botnet linked with services.caughq.org doing? Still spamming aim
clients?
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:29 AM, I)ruid . [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow, that didn't take long...
I released a draft of the Cirque du 0day CFP to a few closed channels a
week or so ago, to float the idea
so IRMPLC goes from xss in cisco products to sql injection in a small user
base webapp?
I think you may need to fire your current 'research' team and start over
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Mark Crowther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
RedDot CMS SQL injection vulnerability (CVE Number:
Micheal Cottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
techie.michael .. enough said, go back to geek squad and stay off the list
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia
FTP PASSWORDS ARE STORED IN PLAINTEXT?!?!?!?!
HOLY FUCK
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 2:09 PM, carl hardwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
A security issue in Filezilla 3.0.9.2 (and previous versions) allows
local users to retrieve all saved passwords because they're stored in
a plain text
I find it funny you are the one to complain about too many advisories when
you spam the list with sprintf and strcpy bugs you grepped for in random
applications everyday
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 9:20 AM, Luigi Auriemma [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Autonomy Keyview Folio Flat File Parsing Buffer
thats right pdp - go run to your protected lists and blogs where you don't
have to hear anything negative and where you can flame people without
contest who talk against you.
you are another Bill O Reilly and everyone thinks of you as such. enjoy your
sheep.
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 9:52 AM,
For those who do not know, perl underground has released the 5th edition of
their e-zine and it can be found here: http://milw0rm.com/papers/194
I would like to thank the perl underground editors for taking my suggestion
[1]
how long did it take you to write all 40 lines of your 'labs' code? I
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 1:35 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
% ps ax | grep '[x]yzzy' | wc -l
you could also teach people the -c parameter to grep but I am just a troll
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 6:08 AM, Petko D. Petkov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you are the only one backing up troth, read on all comments..
You are very dense. All the people posting bad about thoth have not seen
his work either. They are mindless sheep following your bad example. Have
you
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 8:49 AM, nnp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Man, you're wasting your breath with these people.
There's no point in arguing with someone who's willing to title something
as 'The best book ever'. Common sense says that unless you're going to
get experts from every
I think this post sums up best the problem with the hacking exposed series
and the direction pdp's book is going. Hacking exposed does not explain
anything it only teaches tools and results. I much prefer books like
'hacking the art of exploitation', 'the art of software security
assessment',
Just because you call me troll doesn't mean you should ignore my questions.
Who is your book aimed towards? You said this will be the ' best hacking
reference/manual/book ever made' . Doesn't that mean it should contain lots
of low level/kernel level exploitation of which you are incapable?
I see thoth responded negatively to your project and again you assume that
if someone bashes you that he/she has no skill and is just trolling. This
means you obviously were not as his kiwicon talk or read the slides ( not
that you would understand them ) but it shows how arrogant you are.
you
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 10:36 PM, Nate McFeters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I don't consider myself a 'kiddie' and I've considered contributing to
it. I feel like the old adage of blowing out someone elses flame to make
yours burn brighter applies here. Reepex, I didn't get a chance to see your
While I am sure MS is now trembling at the disclosure of such a high impact
bug, I am wondering why you chose core-security.net as your domain when
core security (.com) is already known as a leading security company with a
good name?
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 2:49 PM, SkyOut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
can you please stop sending this retarded crap... we all know how much
talent it takes to write thousands of As to a file and then open it with
every application on cnet download.com and sourceforge but we do not care
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:07 PM, lorenzo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 11:43 AM, worried security
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gadi evron is a born leader
is this a joke?
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by
...
]
Let's do the same with ftp servers , finding a CWD AA crash
is pretty dummy to doh.
Bugs are now rated by originality, not the impact , thanks for the
notification reepex .
2008/2/15, reepex [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
can you please stop sending this retarded crap... we all know how much
someone tells reepex to shutup,
he/she acts as if he/she has a personal or business relationship
with them, and that somehow he/she is important to this person.
What transparent bollocks.
Are you referring to Simon Smith? I assume you are. It is just strange that
he would tell me so many times
the default OS 1gb ram limit is very lame, and has made everyone I know
install another OS
On Feb 8, 2008 2:21 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
It is a remote root exploit on a very popular piece of hardware, you
don't
think that is a big deal?
from what I've read, most people are
So you ran metasploit and then made a blog post. Is this what 'security
research' is considered now? And why did you write this is such a media
hyped way? Trying to get some spotlight?
On Feb 8, 2008 10:47 AM, RISE Security [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
threats then manually create an exploit then report the issue after
verified.
-Original Message-
From: reepex [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 8, 2008 2:38pm
To: RISE Security [EMAIL PROTECTED],
full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] ASUS Eee PC
On Feb 8, 2008 3:15 PM, Erik Harrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I appreciate knowing that I can visit my friends homes and root their
boxes while they order pizza
wirelessly on their couch.
So you can 'root' your friends with a public vulnerability and exploit you
didn't write? Isn't this
hey simon,
Are you still looking to replace your security team because of their
inadequacies? You seemed pretty desperate for skilled workers last time we
talked.
On Feb 8, 2008 3:28 PM, Simon Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You would know. ;]
reepex wrote:
On Feb 8, 2008 3:15 PM, Erik
your 'disclosure' is lame and so is your site. Could you please never email
here again
On Feb 6, 2008 1:06 PM, SkyOut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know its basic, but I am a supporter of FD and therefore
planetluc.com has to be
blamed now! I checked their script MyNews in version 1.6.4 today
I am not sure the intended point of the exploit since you have @roguehost
and not a proper POC, but I believe all you have triggered is normal
behavior for auto logging into .htaccess protected folders in the form
username:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://forum.sambarserver.info/viewtopic.php?p=288
lol best troll ever
On 1/28/08, Donald Republic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Full Disclosure,
We are writing to you in behalf of Bart Cilfone. He has asked us to
contact you and see if you will consider removing the content about him at:
so mr prdelka - how can you act so blackhat when releasing exploits?
Did you write these exploits yourself or did you pawn these off ilja as
usual?
On 1/21/08, Micheal Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
old junk from 2007. roll on 2008! cb payload busted in
rshd exploit. enjoy.
...
if base64 was challenging for you then maybe you should switch fields of
work
On Jan 21, 2008 9:04 PM, Maxim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that was fun ... :-)
stuff like that should be on people's job interviews.
On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 21:59 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Remember that
PROTECTED] wrote:
where did I use the word challenging?
On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 21:25 -0600, reepex wrote:
...
if base64 was challenging for you then maybe you should switch fields
of work
On Jan 21, 2008 9:04 PM, Maxim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that was fun
On Jan 21, 2008 8:39 PM, Harry Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this anything more then a base64 encoded password hash?
base64 encoded password hash - lol - what security for dumbies book did
you get this phrase from? also after identifying it as base64 could you
really not decode it to get
3BcIiB3aGlsZSBwZW9wbGUgdGhhdCB0aG91Z2h0IHRoZXkgd2VyZSBiZXR0ZXIgdGhhbiB5b3UgZGlzY3Vzc2VkIHRoaW5ncyBpbiBsYW5ndWFnZXMgdGhhdCB5b3UgZGlkblwndCB1bmRlcnN0YW5kLg0KDQpTb3J0YSBsaWtlIHJlLXdyaXRpbmcgYWxsIHRoaXMgaW4gR2VybWFuIC4uLg==
On 22/01/2008, reepex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 21, 2008 8:39 PM, Harry Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote
On Jan 21, 2008 10:50 PM, Nick FitzGerald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Think pre-MIME/Base64 and U should be able to suss it out...
nice aol speak noob ;)
it shar would be a pity if people didnt get this
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter:
follower)
reepex wrote:
On Jan 21, 2008 10:50 PM, Nick FitzGerald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Think pre-MIME/Base64 and U should be able to suss it out...
nice aol speak noob ;)
it shar would be a pity if people didnt get
LOL you are an idiot
could you please google format string 101, read the printf man page, and
leave security forever
On Jan 18, 2008 1:45 AM, Tonnerre Lombard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Salut, Fredrick,
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 12:05:13 -0600 Fredrick Diggle
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The
and what exactly does gadi evron know and what .. original research ... has
he ever done?
and your second paragraph makes no sense, and is not related to the topic -
you sound like paul at utdallas
On 1/16/08, scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not to mention that Gadi Evron knows more than all of
so gadi can use ethereal and uninstall malware? congrats?
On 1/17/08, Richard Golodner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been friends with Gadi through email for many years now and
he needs to have someone represent for him. He is a good guy, signs his
own
email instead of the hushmail
On Jan 14, 2008 3:46 PM, Gadi Evron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did not look at the malware, but it is pretty obvious you have been
compromised.
Because you do not have the skill necesary to do so.
Linking also to my original article here:
http://blogs.securiteam.com/index.php/archives/815
:
--On January 16, 2008 8:19:52 PM -0600 reepex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 14, 2008 3:46 PM, Gadi Evron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did not look at the malware, but it is pretty obvious you have been
compromised.
Because you do not have the skill necesary to do so.
Yeah, right
On 1/13/08, pdp (architect) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The most malicious of all malicious things to do when a device is
compromised via the attack described in the link pointed at the top of this
email, is to change the primary DNS server. That will effectively turn the
router and the network
this was a very rude off list reply to my question
and notice - you still have not answered why you released this code a year
later
could you please answer this?
On Jan 10, 2008 6:13 PM, eliteb0y [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shut the fuck up.
--
*From:* reepex
anyone on (or off) the list?
On Jan 10, 2008 6:17 PM, reepex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this was a very rude off list reply to my question
and notice - you still have not answered why you released this
code a year
later
could you please answer this?
On Jan 10, 2008 6:13 PM, eliteb0y
he is a 'point and click' hacker .. do not confuse him
On Jan 8, 2008 3:00 AM, Tonnerre Lombard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Salut,
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 04:21:33 +0200 Markus Jansson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about a nice GUI? Or atleast some kind of GUI?
I dont know what OS are you
everyone hears you.I think you just like to see your own posts.
I'm filtering your posts from now on as they are nothing but from a
wanna-be trying to play kids games in a mans world.
I shouldn't waste my time responding to a teeny- bopper,anyway.
Scott
reepex wrote:
So you included me
himself by putting any worth into what secreview says and replying to their
review.
On Jan 2, 2008 12:02 AM, Andre Gironda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 1, 2008 9:51 PM, reepex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok so they are nothing alike because ptp/hts actually teach you stuff
while
UPT
, if you do
not know C, you will end up understanding at a very very high level what
message passing is and thats about it.
On Jan 2, 2008 12:39 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 01 Jan 2008 12:33:36 CST, reepex said:
Is this list up to date? It makes it seem as if you are learning basic
linux
its funny how you always talk about other people ( like a few days ago when
you were amazed that people exploited an off by one ), and talk about the
old times... sure signs of someone washed up as evident by your
non-productiveness in the last few years ( and no - spamming mailing lists
does not
to the craft:
Secreview (review of products/services you have never bought, are
you the goatse.cz receiver?)
Reepex (Isn't a reepex a bit of farm machinery?)
Gobbles (A nickname for a gay male prostitute)
Morning Wood (The holy grail of the viagra-abuser)
Gmaggro (high value target selection, are you
On Jan 1, 2008 9:04 AM, Adam Muntner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hsve been pentesting since 98 and nearly nonstop since 2000.
You cannot spell either and you have been a 'pentester' ... does this mean
you ran nessus and other automated testing tools and call yourself a hacker?
Sent from my
You are worthless.
http://www.tssci-security.com/bookshelf/
Is this list up to date? It makes it seem as if you are learning basic
linux commands, sed, and basic perl. Also why are you reading operating
system design and implementation when you do not know C? ( Seeing as C books
are in your
.
On Jan 1, 2008 1:33 PM, reepex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are worthless.
http://www.tssci-security.com/bookshelf/
Is this list up to date? It makes it seem as if you are learning basic
linux commands, sed, and basic perl. Also why are you reading operating
system design
.
I will stand by my words. I sign my name to them. Though, based on the
content and quality of your posts, I see why you won't.
Adam Muntner
Managing Partner
QuietMove, Inc.
http://www.quietmove.com
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 1, 2008, at 1:12 PM, reepex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan
On Dec 31, 2007 9:36 PM, Andre Gironda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sites such as PullThePlug, HackThisSite, etc all borrowed ideas from
UPT,
what exactly was borrowed? because I am pretty sure none of the hackthissite
founders were around when this magazine was.
There are few PCI ASV's or
On Jan 1, 2008 9:53 PM, Andre Gironda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wouldn't do a direct comparison, but I thought UPT was more about being
funny than being seriously
challenging.
ok so they are nothing alike because ptp/hts actually teach you stuff while
UPT was for jokes... so your post was
On Jan 1, 2008 9:35 PM, SecReview [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
QuietMove has not provided us with any information that contradicts
anything that we've written in our origional post. We're still
waiting for answers back from them.
It is probably because they, like everyone else, do not care about
seh overwrites are the new scriptalert(document.cookie)/script ?
On Dec 31, 2007 8:55 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This one is the same offset as dwa7w and the same class id as
inotes6. Basically inotes6 and inotes6w share the same class id,
except that inotes6w is unicode. dwa7w is unicode
your profanity is not appreciated. If you are going to troll at least think
of something original and/or clever.
On Dec 28, 2007 6:37 PM, damncon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SHUT THE FUCK UP VALDIS
On Dec 28, 2007 7:51 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 16:09:23 CST, Ifriends
In case you missed it before
-- Forwarded message --
From: reepex [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Dec 23, 2007 8:22 PM
Subject: beyond security sucks at coding
To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk, Gadi Evron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.milw0rm.com/exploits/4773
Gadi and Noam Rathaus
to apologize for the hasty post. SecurityFocus,
please update bid 27026 to reflect the fact that at most, this can just
crash the browser.
Elazar
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Dec 26, 2007 1:28 AM
To: reepex [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Elazar Broad [EMAIL PROTECTED],
full
On Dec 25, 2007 5:29 PM, Elazar Broad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The AOL YGP Picture Editor Control(AIM PicEditor Control) version
9.5.1.8suffers from multiple exploitable buffer overflows in various
properties.
This object is marked safe for scripting. I have not tested other versions.
PoC
http://www.milw0rm.com/exploits/4773
Gadi and Noam Rathaus and the crew suck at coding once again.
From the exploit:
my $ciphers = ;
my $ciphers_length = pack('n', length($ciphers));
my $certificate = ;
my $certificate_length = pack('n', length($certificate));
I think the italian Phd
when should we expect more ground breaking 0day from you and your company?
We wouldn't want to keep Cisco complacent for too long
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored
if this happened all FD members would go broke because they are kiddies who
rely on automated tools for everything
On Dec 19, 2007 3:59 PM, gmaggro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
..it would be a nice touch if everyone sent a few dollars to the
projects or authors of the security tools they use. I
nothing don ever does is useful or funny
On Dec 20, 2007 2:14 PM, SecReview [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don, the origional poster is anonymous so its not actually that
funny.
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 14:59:01 -0500 don bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SecReview wrote:
Awesome,
... would you be
lulz ... nice find
maybe Gadi Evron can publish his first exploit now
On Dec 18, 2007 12:25 PM, iDefense Labs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
iDefense Security Advisory 12.17.07
http://labs.idefense.com/intelligence/vulnerabilities/
Dec 17, 2007
I. BACKGROUND
The mount_smbfs utility is used to
So a kid posts his first found exploit to every mailing list and you are
going to bash him? If you scare him off or discourage him then we wont get
code and screenshots from his future high-risk 0day.
On Dec 15, 2007 7:29 AM, fabio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wtf? remote exploit? you need an
this kid spent many hard hours reading man pages looking for 0day, gives it
to us along with hello world python networking code ( that is incapable of
parsing replies so any unintended behaviour causes exit), and you are going
to bash it? You are probably just jealous you do not have the
I have been following your blog alot and think the idea is really awesome
but this one line...
On Dec 13, 2007 2:23 PM, secreview [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
true Ethical Hacker talent.
Was this meant to be humorous? You realize that 'ethical hacker' ( as in the
certification) is a bunch of X
so are you now admitting your vulnerability was worthless?
On Dec 13, 2007 12:02 PM, Morning Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
im so hurt now... you make me feel so small compared to your great worx
MrReepass
stfu kthnx
- Original Message -
From: reepex [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Morning
automatic updates with notification? Silent patching? Microsoft tactics?
I also knew websense was a joke but now you have come to this?
On Dec 13, 2007 8:49 AM, Hubbard, Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An added note on this...
Customers do not need to download nor install any new patch for
/EXPLOITS?MODE=SELECTMODULE=%6e%65%74%74%65%72%6d%5f%6e%65%74%66%74%70%64%5f%75%73%65%72%5f%6f%76%65%72%66%6c%6f%77
*hugz*
- Original Message -
From: reepex [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Morning Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED];
full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 1:58 PM
are you serious?
http://www.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/securityfocus/bugtraq/2003-07/0259.html
I guess you are a 'brain dead india wannabe sec researcher' also?
On Dec 11, 2007 6:22 AM, Morning Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
advisories like this are typical of brain dead India wannabe sec
is this a serious report or just troll bait?
buzz words, charts and graphs, and nothing technical
is that you gadi?
On Dec 11, 2007 3:48 PM, Sowhat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's the last month of 2007 and the time is right to look back at the year
and predict the
vulnerability trends for
turned down? should i forward the list the emails were you and that random
from netragard were begging me to work for you?
On Dec 9, 2007 12:17 PM, Simon Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Awww, reepex feels bad because he got turned down... ;]
reepex wrote:
only simon from snosoft and people
the first email from simon asking about where i work following a succesful
troll of some random kiddie
On Oct 31, 2007 4:37 PM, Simon Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Reepex,
What company are you with? I'm actually interested in finding
my response about a fictional company to keep the game along
On Oct 31, 2007 10:03 PM, reepex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I work at a less known security company that bans use of any automated
tools unless under extreme circumstances. These include times such as
when have 1000s of ip addresses
to partner with because we have a lot of overflow
work. Or at least, I think we are, you haven't told me what company yet.
reepex wrote:
I work at a less known security company that bans use of any automated
tools unless under extreme circumstances. These include times such as
when have 1000s
: 617-934-0269
Mobile : 617-633-3821
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/1/118/a45
---
Netragard, LLC - http://www.netragard.com - We make IT Safe
Penetration Testing, Vulnerability Assessments, Website Security
reepex wrote:
I
with
companies and hire employees based on troll posts from FD
On Nov 5, 2007 10:59 AM, Simon Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thought you were interested in contract work?
reepex wrote:
you see you are arguing how useful xss can be for an attacker, but the
point of this argument is
1) how hard
the emails are sent
your move
On Dec 9, 2007 2:02 PM, Simon Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Forward what ever you want, just make sure to edit it first so that you
don't look like a liar ;)
dripping wrote:
I like how he still hasn't responded.
reepex wrote:
im going to wait for simon
lol I R cant code computer programs to parse simple formats so i beg on
mailing lists to make old cissps feel elite lolololol
On Dec 6, 2007 1:35 AM, Ivan . [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ethereal/wireshark is a no go, as it won't process the file due to size,
tcpflow is OK, but a little untidy.
holy shit batman!
~$ grep -i grsec draft-ietf-tsvwg-port-randomization-00.txt
~$
as stated by the last person its very strange you do not mention grsecurity
in your
Survey of the algorithms in use by some popular implementations
Are you a developer of selinux or a close friend/relative/lover?
I tried responding to your mail but it seems you did not get it so maybe you
will on the list
yes I would LOVE to your join your crew - could you please email me your
silc server and bbs board details?
On Dec 3, 2007 8:00 AM, Gobbles is back [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Would you wish to join our
and advertise like we're not actually
advertising for ourselves.
reepex wrote:
I tried responding to your mail but it seems you did not get it so maybe
you
will on the list
yes I would LOVE to your join your crew - could you please email me your
silc server and bbs board details
So almighty Phd what is your thesis exactly?
To me it seems to be 'how to run a fuzzer then write crappy perl scripts
to exploit DoS conditions'
does this properly summarize your phd credentials?
I guess you could tack on 'after writing the crappy scripts, flood mailing
lists with our crap,
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
