Now... Here is the question...
Which is worse... Sitting on IRC and making those comments... Or browsing
bash.org to view them.
*sigh*
~
IRC is still around because it does one thing.
It proves that Einstein was right about stupidity: it
is infinite.
[frank] can you help me install GTA3?
Todd Towles wrote:
Windows doesn't tell you about the Admin account and makes the default
user a Admin. That isn't best method as you know.
RunAs is great..but that is only good once you create a normal user -
and then delete your new default user. Or you log in in Administrator
and take away
if shooting people is evil, OBVIOUSLY guns are flawed, but only
insofar as people are capable of abusing them, willing to abuse them,
and effective in their attempts at doing so. so to burn the candle at
both ends you have to fight the spread of trojans and virii by fixing
the holes they
/me shakes her head at Andrew Farmer.
Okay, now it's just ridiculous to suggest that you wouldn't be able to
implement a time limitation on something encrypted simply because
clocks can be changed.
What 'clocks' are talking about -- which are you basing it off of?
What if you decided to code
Did u just realize what u posted ?
xploitable _ at _ gmail.com wants to close hacking sites.
Dude, what are you on ? I want some
n3td3v wrote:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:26:12 -0600, Todd Towles
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I sent this to n3td3v yesterday. Why look into the news..just go to the
Well Done. I did myself start to spend more time explaining what i
before thought users couldn't comprehend and i have achieved surprising
results.
No, they won't suddenly change, but at least it has saved me from re
doing the same thing over and over again. They do listen. They do not
want
joe wrote:
Anyway, the base cause is a simple one, Windows is consumer based and *nix
wasn't and really still isn't. Look at the market penetrations. *nix tends
to have people already knowledgeable with its workings or people who WANT to
learn the details using it,
Well, Mac OSX is a fully
One. Its tolerance.
Two. I am glad you are not in charge of this world, or freedom will have
ceased.
n3td3v wrote:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 17:53:44 +, n3td3v [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 11:41:20 -0600, Todd Towles
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, it is given that posting
Since we're sharing information:
Sometimes ago I have examined the products of many software company's to see if
it's possible to exploit vulnerabilities remotely. I have found a number of
vulnerabilities in a number of software products. Vendors have (or will be)
informed of my successful
IRC is a tool/channel to exchange messages, just like mailing lists,
web forums, instant messengers and etc. If there's no IRC, hackers or
who has the same ideas would also find other channels to found groups,
as you joined the Full-Disclosure mailing list. :P
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:40:26 -0500,
Very well said. And kindly too.
Talk or shut up is faster, somehow not as kind.
Michael Rutledge wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong (which I know the list members will take me up
on that), the FD mailing list is about *discussing* vulnerabilities
and revealing important information to the community.
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 05:00:27 + (GMT), Steve R
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First you say that *you* would even close IRC channels
and then you state that this idea would never work.
Yes, there is a difference between closing IRC channels and banning
IRC from the internet, as the previous author
Credits:
d.w., ms, [...]
and billy bilano perhaps?
--
robert hogan
dublin
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 19:23:55 -0600, Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I disagree. Until the research is credible and vetted, investigating is
premature. Many people don't seem to understand, investigating supposed
discrepancies in the vote costs millions of dollars. The recount in Ohio
1. XP would be more suitable to run as a user if the runas service and
windows installers were developed to add more complete and easy to use
privilege elevation techniques outside of active directory and the
default group policy that gets applied.
2. Due to the above, the power users group is
Ooh! A boast thread, goody!
There are many vulnerabilities in many .gov websites, i think the fact
that you might get arrested and/or labelled a terrorist deters
most people.
--
zxy_rbt2
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
jax == Jacqueline Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
jax /me shakes her head at Andrew Farmer. Okay, now it's just
jax ridiculous to suggest that you wouldn't be able to implement
jax a time limitation on something encrypted simply because
Hi,
working on a spamdexing paper, as i think it could become one day a serious
problem like the spam is nowadays, i've experienced a tried way to generate
web traffic and trick the hit counters.
As an example you can take a look at:
http://www.spreadfirefox.com/?q=affiliates/top250
If you want to
LOL, ok you have me on that one. It is something, but very little. :oD
Joe
--
Pro-Choice
Let me choose if I even want a browser loaded thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Frank Knobbe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2004 11:54 AM
To: joe
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What would IT be like today without IRC (or the like)? Am I narrow
minded to say that it would be a much safer place?
I can easily show you the flaw in this thinking. Take it to the extreme and
ban everything except http and pop/smtp since that's all 95% of the users on
the net use anyway. If
OSX is an interesting case but at the moment it is still an infant. I look
forward to seeing what happens with it as you are correct, it is very
consumer oriented. To put it another way, it is a chance for *nix to show
off its normal user wings if it has any. People who would get off Windows
Ok, its been a couple days now why are people still responding to this
saying the same thing over and over. Do you people even read the emails? You
should have noticed everything you keep saying was said already by 20 other
people
___
Full-Disclosure -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of RandallM The question above is answered IMHO as yes. Any one
who admins
or is a PC support person would have to agree. Come'on, if you
change their monitor they freak out that there folders are now
gone!
Absolutely. One bank
On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 04:19:49PM -0600, Paul Schmehl wrote:
Windows has several groups. By default users are in the USERS
group, *not* the ADMINISTRATORS group.
On every XP install that I've seen from every major OEM (Dell,
Compaq, Gateway, etc) fast user switching is on by default
I seemed to have struck a nerve here Maurizio. I have to say, nothing you
have written here has particularly enhanced my concept of the the MCSE
program.
There are specific MVPs who certainly are cheerleaders but that has nothing
to do with them being MVPs nor the general state of the MVP
This has got to be close to the most stupid thread ever on full-disclosure.
I'm not sure if it gets that because the original email was so
incredibly naieve or just narrow minded or just a result of very
shallow thinking.
It's almost dumb enough that you could suggest its premise to some
vord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if shooting people is evil, OBVIOUSLY guns are flawed, but only
insofar as people are capable of abusing them, willing to abuse them,
and effective in their attempts at doing so. so to burn the candle at
both ends you have to fight the spread of trojans and virii
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Anders Langworthy wrote:
If a certain deterministic computation (e.g. decryption) can be made in
time T, then it can be made in any time T' T.
This is true for breaking a cipher by brute force, but it doesn't
account for (stop looking at me) somehow incorporating a
On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 06:06:10PM -0500, Micheal Espinola Jr wrote:
Your accusations again joe's expertise and knowledge in this area are
completely unsubstantiated.
i have not seen any proofs of joe's expertise or knowledge - can you give
some proofs?
for me joe is just a chatterbox in bed
Al Qaeda is to Iraq what electronic voting is to the bush election win.
--vord
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 08:06:13 -0600, Stef [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 19:23:55 -0600, Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I disagree. Until the research is credible and vetted, investigating is
Anyone know how many cents of MSFT valuation are a direct result of and
attributable to MVPs?
I was lucky... I escaped before anyone threatened to make me into an MVP.
-Original Message-
From: Georgi Guninski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 22:01:12
To:Micheal Espinola Jr
Full disclosure by an Anonymous
MCA Records isn't told about this vuln,this
is a fulldisclosure, highly critical.
More infos: http://www.hat-squad.com/weblog/archives/98.html
greetz to str0ke and milw0rm.com for the good
lookup :)
That sentiment is particularly humorous coming from you...
-ASB
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 22:01:12 +0200, Georgi Guninski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 06:06:10PM -0500, Micheal Espinola Jr wrote:
Your accusations again joe's expertise and knowledge in this area are
completely
Ah, nostalgia...
I have appropriately suppressed many of my memories in this regard.
-ASB
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 12:22:24 -0500, joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of RandallM The question above is answered IMHO as yes. Any one
who
On 21 Nov 2004, at 00:14, Jacqueline Singh wrote:
Gautam R. Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was just wondering is there any encrytpion alogortim which expires
with time.
For example an email message maybe decrypted withing 48 hours of its
delivery otherwise it become usless or cant be decrypted
On 19 Nov 2004, at 17:22, Simon Lorentsen wrote:
In the following scenario; you are a business, is IRC logs of
conversations and lists of hosts be help up in a court of law if a
client you spoke to refused to pay or hold up the end of a bargain or
agreement, and is faxing a document (no hard
Gautam R. Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was just wondering is there any encrytpion alogortim which expires
with time.
For example an email message maybe decrypted withing 48 hours of its
delivery otherwise it become usless or cant be decrypted with the
orignal key
Scenario:
Lets imagine
Georgi,
The may sound harsh, but the day I worry about proving my anything to you is
the day after I decide to get the MCSE certification.
Further, if I ever get to the point about worrying what you think, I will
have to hang my 0 and 1 bits on the rack.
joe
-Original Message-
(with a nod to Esmond Kane)
At 17:50 2004-11-19, Paul Schmehl thusly scribed:
--On Thursday, November 18, 2004 09:32:27 AM -0600 Paul Schmehl [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
--On Wednesday, November 17, 2004 12:41:44 PM -0500 Lachniet, Mark
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could also be RF
http://www.securitytracker.com/alerts/2004/Nov/1012289.html
___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
On 21 Nov 2004, at 18:11, n3td3v wrote:
http://www.securitytracker.com/alerts/2004/Nov/1012289.html
Appears to have been fixed.
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On 21 Nov 2004, at 17:18, Tiago Halm wrote:
Gautam R. Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was just wondering is there any encrytpion alogortim which expires
with time.
For example an email message maybe decrypted withing 48 hours of its
delivery otherwise it become usless or cant be decrypted with
Hey Guys this is reallly getting on to ur egoes. loyality pays
royality at times.after all we all play with what pays. its high time
we realise most of the vendor certifications are over rated and dnt
guarantee the depth of knowledge. The HR people are a real piece of
morons all over if atall
43 matches
Mail list logo
