[Full-Disclosure] Re: New whitepaper: Writing IA32 Restricted Instruction Set Shellcode Decoder Loops

2004-11-18 Thread Michael Vergoz
Hi,
Nice paper.
Some code examples should be great (i think).
A question : what about false-disassembly into shellcode ?
like :
mov eax, eax
[...]
jmp false
db 0xAA
[...]
false:
mov eax, 1
int 0x80
[...]
mv
On 17 nov. 04, at 23:00, Peter Willis wrote:
Hey, cool paper. Speaking of phrack, if in the future you have an 
article you think is print-worthy but is rejected by most zines, try 
sending it to Binary Revolution [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Although 
they're newer and have had some delays in getting new issues out, 
they're starting to re-focus on the magazine and the number of their 
supporters is growing. Sorry if this comes off a little advertisey, 
but hopefully if more people write in then BinRev can publish more 
original articles about vulnerabilities which can then make it back 
onto the web as sample articles.

Berend-Jan Wever wrote:
Hi all,
This one got rejected by phrack and I couldn't be arsed to rewrite it 
so it would make the next edition:
Writing IA32 Restricted Instruction Set Shellcode Decoder Loops by 
SkyLined
( http://www.edup.tudelft.nl/~bjwever/whitepaper_shellcode.html )

The article addresses the requirements for writing a shellcode 
decoder loop using a limited number of characters that limits our 
instruction set. Most of it is based on my experience with 
alphanumeric decoders but the principles apply to any piece of code 
that is written to work with a limited instruction set. (It's a 
continuation on rix's and obscou's work for phrack).

Comments and questions welcome, but I can not guarantee an answer to 
n00b questions.

Cheers,
SkyLined
http://www.edup.tudelft.nl/~bjwever
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: New whitepaper: Writing IA32 Restricted Instruction Set Shellcode Decoder Loops

2004-11-18 Thread Berend-Jan Wever
Code examples ?
Check out the Shellcode encoders source codes on my webpage.

Cheers,
SkyLined

PS. please send any discussions on the paper in pm to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or 
#SkyLined on EFNet

- Original Message - 
From: Michael Vergoz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Peter Willis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Berend-Jan Wever 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004 09:04
Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Re: New whitepaper: Writing IA32 Restricted 
Instruction Set Shellcode Decoder Loops


 Hi,
 
 Nice paper.
 Some code examples should be great (i think).
 A question : what about false-disassembly into shellcode ?
 
 like :
 mov eax, eax
 [...]
 jmp false
 db 0xAA
 [...]
 false:
 mov eax, 1
 int 0x80
 [...]
 
 mv
 
 On 17 nov. 04, at 23:00, Peter Willis wrote:
 
  Hey, cool paper. Speaking of phrack, if in the future you have an 
  article you think is print-worthy but is rejected by most zines, try 
  sending it to Binary Revolution [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Although 
  they're newer and have had some delays in getting new issues out, 
  they're starting to re-focus on the magazine and the number of their 
  supporters is growing. Sorry if this comes off a little advertisey, 
  but hopefully if more people write in then BinRev can publish more 
  original articles about vulnerabilities which can then make it back 
  onto the web as sample articles.
 
  Berend-Jan Wever wrote:
 
  Hi all,
 
  This one got rejected by phrack and I couldn't be arsed to rewrite it 
  so it would make the next edition:
  Writing IA32 Restricted Instruction Set Shellcode Decoder Loops by 
  SkyLined
  ( http://www.edup.tudelft.nl/~bjwever/whitepaper_shellcode.html )
 
  The article addresses the requirements for writing a shellcode 
  decoder loop using a limited number of characters that limits our 
  instruction set. Most of it is based on my experience with 
  alphanumeric decoders but the principles apply to any piece of code 
  that is written to work with a limited instruction set. (It's a 
  continuation on rix's and obscou's work for phrack).
 
  Comments and questions welcome, but I can not guarantee an answer to 
  n00b questions.
 
  Cheers,
  SkyLined
 
  http://www.edup.tudelft.nl/~bjwever
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
 Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
 
 


___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


[Full-Disclosure] Re: New whitepaper: Writing IA32 Restricted Instruction Set Shellcode Decoder Loops

2004-11-17 Thread Peter Willis
Hey, cool paper. Speaking of phrack, if in the future you have an 
article you think is print-worthy but is rejected by most zines, try 
sending it to Binary Revolution [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Although they're 
newer and have had some delays in getting new issues out, they're 
starting to re-focus on the magazine and the number of their supporters 
is growing. Sorry if this comes off a little advertisey, but hopefully 
if more people write in then BinRev can publish more original articles 
about vulnerabilities which can then make it back onto the web as sample 
articles.

Berend-Jan Wever wrote:
Hi all,
This one got rejected by phrack and I couldn't be arsed to rewrite it so it 
would make the next edition:
Writing IA32 Restricted Instruction Set Shellcode Decoder Loops by SkyLined
( http://www.edup.tudelft.nl/~bjwever/whitepaper_shellcode.html )
The article addresses the requirements for writing a shellcode decoder loop 
using a limited number of characters that limits our instruction set. Most of 
it is based on my experience with alphanumeric decoders but the principles 
apply to any piece of code that is written to work with a limited instruction 
set. (It's a continuation on rix's and obscou's work for phrack).
Comments and questions welcome, but I can not guarantee an answer to n00b 
questions.
Cheers,
SkyLined
http://www.edup.tudelft.nl/~bjwever
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

___
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html